A chart review process aided by natural language processing and multi-wave adaptive sampling to expedite validation of code-based algorithms for large database studies

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.22943v1
• Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 17:11:22 GMT
• Title: A chart review process aided by natural language processing and multi-wave adaptive sampling to expedite validation of code-based algorithms for large database studies
• Authors: Shirley V Wang, Georg Hahn, Sushama Kattinakere Sreedhara, Mufaddal Mahesri, Haritha S. Pillai, Rajendra Aldis, Joyce Lii, Sarah K. Dutcher, Rhoda Eniafe, Jamal T. Jones, Keewan Kim, Jiwei He, Hana Lee, Sengwee Toh, Rishi J Desai, Jie Yang,
• Abstract summary: We describe an expedited process that reduces time spent by human reviewers to review each chart.<n>We illustrate this process in a case study that validates the performance of a claims-based outcome algorithm for intentional self-harm.
• Score: 3.452275310496547
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Background: One of the ways to enhance analyses conducted with large claims databases is by validating the measurement characteristics of code-based algorithms used to identify health outcomes or other key study parameters of interest. These metrics can be used in quantitative bias analyses to assess the robustness of results for an inferential study given potential bias from outcome misclassification. However, extensive time and resource allocation are typically re-quired to create reference-standard labels through manual chart review of free-text notes from linked electronic health records. Methods: We describe an expedited process that introduces efficiency in a validation study us-ing two distinct mechanisms: 1) use of natural language processing (NLP) to reduce time spent by human reviewers to review each chart, and 2) a multi-wave adaptive sampling approach with pre-defined criteria to stop the validation study once performance characteristics are identified with sufficient precision. We illustrate this process in a case study that validates the performance of a claims-based outcome algorithm for intentional self-harm in patients with obesity. Results: We empirically demonstrate that the NLP-assisted annotation process reduced the time spent on review per chart by 40% and use of the pre-defined stopping rule with multi-wave samples would have prevented review of 77% of patient charts with limited compromise to precision in derived measurement characteristics. Conclusion: This approach could facilitate more routine validation of code-based algorithms used to define key study parameters, ultimately enhancing understanding of the reliability of find-ings derived from database studies.

Related papers

• On the Interconnections of Calibration, Quantification, and Classifier Accuracy Prediction under Dataset Shift [58.91436551466064]
  This paper investigates the interconnections among three fundamental problems, calibration, and quantification, under dataset shift conditions.<n>We show that access to an oracle for any one of these tasks enables the resolution of the other two.<n>We propose new methods for each problem based on direct adaptations of well-established methods borrowed from the other disciplines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T15:42:55Z)
• An extensive simulation study evaluating the interaction of resampling techniques across multiple causal discovery contexts [2.0946534289186842]
  We present theoretical results proving that certain resampling methods emulate the assignment of specific values to algorithm tuning parameters.<n>We also report the results of extensive simulation experiments, which verify the theoretical result and provide substantial data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T17:18:18Z)
• Improving Bias Correction Standards by Quantifying its Effects on Treatment Outcomes [54.18828236350544]
  Propensity score matching (PSM) addresses selection biases by selecting comparable populations for analysis. Different matching methods can produce significantly different Average Treatment Effects (ATE) for the same task, even when meeting all validation criteria. To address this issue, we introduce a novel metric, A2A, to reduce the number of valid matches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-20T12:42:24Z)
• A New Benchmark and Reverse Validation Method for Passage-level Hallucination Detection [63.56136319976554]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) generate hallucinations, which can cause significant damage when deployed for mission-critical tasks. We propose a self-check approach based on reverse validation to detect factual errors automatically in a zero-resource fashion. We empirically evaluate our method and existing zero-resource detection methods on two datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T10:14:59Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)
• Validation Diagnostics for SBI algorithms based on Normalizing Flows [55.41644538483948]
  This work proposes easy to interpret validation diagnostics for multi-dimensional conditional (posterior) density estimators based on NF. It also offers theoretical guarantees based on results of local consistency. This work should help the design of better specified models or drive the development of novel SBI-algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-17T15:48:06Z)
• Generalization bounds and algorithms for estimating conditional average treatment effect of dosage [13.867315751451494]
  We investigate the task of estimating the conditional average causal effect of treatment-dosage pairs from a combination of observational data and assumptions on the causal relationships in the underlying system. This has been a longstanding challenge for fields of study such as epidemiology or economics that require a treatment-dosage pair to make decisions. We show empirically new state-of-the-art performance results across several benchmark datasets for this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-29T15:26:59Z)
• Information-Theoretic Bias Reduction via Causal View of Spurious Correlation [71.9123886505321]
  We propose an information-theoretic bias measurement technique through a causal interpretation of spurious correlation. We present a novel debiasing framework against the algorithmic bias, which incorporates a bias regularization loss. The proposed bias measurement and debiasing approaches are validated in diverse realistic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-10T01:19:31Z)
• Efficient Estimation and Evaluation of Prediction Rules in Semi-Supervised Settings under Stratified Sampling [6.930951733450623]
  We propose a two-step semi-supervised learning (SSL) procedure for evaluating a prediction rule derived from a working binary regression model. In step I, we impute the missing labels via weighted regression with nonlinear basis functions to account for nonrandom sampling. In step II, we augment the initial imputations to ensure the consistency of the resulting estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T12:54:45Z)
• Probabilistic Diagnostic Tests for Degradation Problems in Supervised Learning [0.0]
  Problems such as class imbalance, overlapping, small-disjuncts, noisy labels, and sparseness limit accuracy in classification algorithms. Probability diagnostic model based on identifying signs and symptoms of each problem is presented. Behavior and performance of several supervised algorithms are studied when training sets have such problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T20:32:35Z)
• Overly Optimistic Prediction Results on Imbalanced Data: a Case Study of Flaws and Benefits when Applying Over-sampling [13.463035357173045]
  We focus on one specific type of methodological flaw: applying over-sampling before partitioning the data into mutually exclusive training and testing sets. We show how this causes the results to be biased using two artificial datasets and reproduce results of studies in which this flaw was identified.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-15T12:53:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.