Causal Explanation of Concept Drift -- A Truly Actionable Approach

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23389v1
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 10:02:28 GMT
• Title: Causal Explanation of Concept Drift -- A Truly Actionable Approach
• Authors: David Komnick, Kathrin Lammers, Barbara Hammer, Valerie Vaquet, Fabian Hinder,
• Abstract summary: We extend model-based drift explanations towards causal explanations, which increases the actionability of the provided explanations.<n>We evaluate our explanation strategy on a number of use cases, demonstrating the practical usefulness of our framework.
• Score: 5.319765271848658
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In a world that constantly changes, it is crucial to understand how those changes impact different systems, such as industrial manufacturing or critical infrastructure. Explaining critical changes, referred to as concept drift in the field of machine learning, is the first step towards enabling targeted interventions to avoid or correct model failures, as well as malfunctions and errors in the physical world. Therefore, in this work, we extend model-based drift explanations towards causal explanations, which increases the actionability of the provided explanations. We evaluate our explanation strategy on a number of use cases, demonstrating the practical usefulness of our framework, which isolates the causally relevant features impacted by concept drift and, thus, allows for targeted intervention.

Related papers

• Causally Reliable Concept Bottleneck Models [4.411356026951205]
  Concept-based models fail to account for the true causal mechanisms underlying the target phenomena represented in the data.<n>We propose Causally reliable Concept Bottleneck Models (C$2$BMs), a class of concept-based architectures that enforce reasoning through a bottleneck of concepts structured according to a model of the real-world causal mechanisms.<n>We show that C$2$BMs are more interpretable, causally reliable, and improve responsiveness to interventions w.r.t. standard opaque and concept-based models, while maintaining their accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T12:06:54Z)
• Rolling with the Punches: Resilient Contrastive Pre-training under Non-Stationary Drift [16.97188816362991]
  A critical emerging challenge is the effective pre-training of models on dynamic data streams.<n>We first reveal that conventional contrastive pre-training methods are notably vulnerable to concept drift.<n>We propose Resilient Contrastive Pre-training (RCP), a novel method incorporating causal intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T15:09:05Z)
• MCCE: Missingness-aware Causal Concept Explainer [4.56242146925245]
  We introduce the Missingness-aware Causal Concept Explainer (MCCE) to estimate causal concept effects when not all concepts are observable. Our framework learns to account for residual bias resulting from missing concepts and utilizes a linear predictor to model the relationships between these concepts and the outputs of black-box machine learning models. We conduct validations using a real-world dataset, demonstrating that MCCE achieves promising performance compared to state-of-the-art explanation methods in causal concept effect estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T18:03:44Z)
• Improving Intervention Efficacy via Concept Realignment in Concept Bottleneck Models [57.86303579812877]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) ground image classification on human-understandable concepts to allow for interpretable model decisions. Existing approaches often require numerous human interventions per image to achieve strong performances. We introduce a trainable concept realignment intervention module, which leverages concept relations to realign concept assignments post-intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T17:59:01Z)
• Towards Robust and Adaptive Motion Forecasting: A Causal Representation Perspective [72.55093886515824]
  We introduce a causal formalism of motion forecasting, which casts the problem as a dynamic process with three groups of latent variables. We devise a modular architecture that factorizes the representations of invariant mechanisms and style confounders to approximate a causal graph. Experiment results on synthetic and real datasets show that our three proposed components significantly improve the robustness and reusability of the learned motion representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T18:59:09Z)
• Explainers in the Wild: Making Surrogate Explainers Robust to Distortions through Perception [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a methodology to evaluate the effect of distortions in explanations by embedding perceptual distances. We generate explanations for images in the Imagenet-C dataset and demonstrate how using a perceptual distances in the surrogate explainer creates more coherent explanations for the distorted and reference images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T12:38:53Z)
• Behavior Priors for Efficient Reinforcement Learning [97.81587970962232]
  We consider how information and architectural constraints can be combined with ideas from the probabilistic modeling literature to learn behavior priors. We discuss how such latent variable formulations connect to related work on hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) and mutual information and curiosity based objectives. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework by applying it to a range of simulated continuous control domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-27T13:17:18Z)
• Remembering for the Right Reasons: Explanations Reduce Catastrophic Forgetting [100.75479161884935]
  We propose a novel training paradigm called Remembering for the Right Reasons (RRR) RRR stores visual model explanations for each example in the buffer and ensures the model has "the right reasons" for its predictions. We demonstrate how RRR can be easily added to any memory or regularization-based approach and results in reduced forgetting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T10:05:27Z)
• Towards Interpretable Reasoning over Paragraph Effects in Situation [126.65672196760345]
  We focus on the task of reasoning over paragraph effects in situation, which requires a model to understand the cause and effect. We propose a sequential approach for this task which explicitly models each step of the reasoning process with neural network modules. In particular, five reasoning modules are designed and learned in an end-to-end manner, which leads to a more interpretable model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-03T04:03:52Z)
• Debiasing Concept-based Explanations with Causal Analysis [4.911435444514558]
  We study the problem of the concepts being correlated with confounding information in the features. We propose a new causal prior graph for modeling the impacts of unobserved variables. We show that our debiasing method works when the concepts are not complete.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-22T15:42:46Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations of Concept Drift [11.53362411363005]
  concept drift refers to the phenomenon that the distribution, which is underlying the observed data, changes over time. We present a novel technology, which characterizes concept drift in terms of the characteristic change of spatial features represented by typical examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T08:27:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.