RL as Regressor: A Reinforcement Learning Approach for Function Approximation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00174v1
• Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 21:39:24 GMT
• Title: RL as Regressor: A Reinforcement Learning Approach for Function Approximation
• Authors: Yongchao Huang,
• Abstract summary: We propose framing regression as a Reinforcement Learning (RL) problem.<n>We demonstrate this by treating a model's prediction as an action and defining a custom reward signal based on the prediction error.<n>We show that the RL framework not only successfully solves the regression problem but also offers enhanced flexibility in defining objectives and guiding the learning process.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Standard regression techniques, while powerful, are often constrained by predefined, differentiable loss functions such as mean squared error. These functions may not fully capture the desired behavior of a system, especially when dealing with asymmetric costs or complex, non-differentiable objectives. In this paper, we explore an alternative paradigm: framing regression as a Reinforcement Learning (RL) problem. We demonstrate this by treating a model's prediction as an action and defining a custom reward signal based on the prediction error, and we can leverage powerful RL algorithms to perform function approximation. Through a progressive case study of learning a noisy sine wave, we illustrate the development of an Actor-Critic agent, iteratively enhancing it with Prioritized Experience Replay, increased network capacity, and positional encoding to enable a capable RL agent for this regression task. Our results show that the RL framework not only successfully solves the regression problem but also offers enhanced flexibility in defining objectives and guiding the learning process.

Related papers

• ReVeal: Self-Evolving Code Agents via Iterative Generation-Verification [6.983144806500892]
  ReVeal is a multi-turn reinforcement learning framework that interleaves code generation with explicit self-verification and tool-based evaluation.<n>It fosters the co-evolution of a model's generation and verification capabilities through RL training, expanding the reasoning boundaries of the base model.<n>It also enables test-time scaling into deeper inference regimes, with code consistently evolving as the number of turns increases during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T03:41:04Z)
• Dynamic Learning Rate for Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Bandit Approach [0.9549646359252346]
  In deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) models trained using gradient-based techniques, the choice of gradient and its learning rate are crucial to achieving good performance.<n>We propose dynamic Learning Rate for deep Reinforcement Learning (LRRL), a meta-learning approach that selects the learning rate based on the agent's performance during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T14:15:28Z)
• Automatic debiasing of neural networks via moment-constrained learning [0.0]
  Naively learning the regression function and taking a sample mean of the target functional results in biased estimators.<n>We propose moment-constrained learning as a new RR learning approach that addresses some shortcomings in automatic debiasing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T20:56:54Z)
• Stop Regressing: Training Value Functions via Classification for Scalable Deep RL [109.44370201929246]
  We show that training value functions with categorical cross-entropy improves performance and scalability in a variety of domains. These include: single-task RL on Atari 2600 games with SoftMoEs, multi-task RL on Atari with large-scale ResNets, robotic manipulation with Q-transformers, playing Chess without search, and a language-agent Wordle task with high-capacity Transformers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T18:55:47Z)
• Deep Generative Symbolic Regression [83.04219479605801]
  Symbolic regression aims to discover concise closed-form mathematical equations from data. Existing methods, ranging from search to reinforcement learning, fail to scale with the number of input variables. We propose an instantiation of our framework, Deep Generative Symbolic Regression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T17:05:31Z)
• REBEL: Reward Regularization-Based Approach for Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [61.54791065013767]
  A misalignment between the reward function and human preferences can lead to catastrophic outcomes in the real world.<n>Recent methods aim to mitigate misalignment by learning reward functions from human preferences.<n>We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T04:56:37Z)
• Understanding, Predicting and Better Resolving Q-Value Divergence in Offline-RL [86.0987896274354]
  We first identify a fundamental pattern, self-excitation, as the primary cause of Q-value estimation divergence in offline RL. We then propose a novel Self-Excite Eigenvalue Measure (SEEM) metric to measure the evolving property of Q-network at training. For the first time, our theory can reliably decide whether the training will diverge at an early stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T17:57:44Z)
• Understanding Augmentation-based Self-Supervised Representation Learning via RKHS Approximation and Regression [53.15502562048627]
  Recent work has built the connection between self-supervised learning and the approximation of the top eigenspace of a graph Laplacian operator. This work delves into a statistical analysis of augmentation-based pretraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T15:18:55Z)
• Hyperbolic Deep Reinforcement Learning [8.983647543608226]
  We propose a new class of deep reinforcement learning algorithms that model latent representations in hyperbolic space. We empirically validate our framework by applying it to popular on-policy and off-policy RL algorithms on the Procgen and Atari 100K benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T12:03:04Z)
• Stabilizing Q-learning with Linear Architectures for Provably Efficient Learning [53.17258888552998]
  This work proposes an exploration variant of the basic $Q$-learning protocol with linear function approximation. We show that the performance of the algorithm degrades very gracefully under a novel and more permissive notion of approximation error.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-01T23:26:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.