EthicAlly: a Prototype for AI-Powered Research Ethics Support for the Social Sciences and Humanities

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00856v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:34:16 GMT
• Title: EthicAlly: a Prototype for AI-Powered Research Ethics Support for the Social Sciences and Humanities
• Authors: Steph Grohmann,
• Abstract summary: EthicAlly is a proof-of-concept prototype for an AI-powered ethics support system for social science and humanities researchers.<n>It provides structured ethics assessment that incorporates both universal ethics principles and contextual and interpretive considerations.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In biomedical science, review by a Research Ethics Committee (REC) is an indispensable way of protecting human subjects from harm. However, in social science and the humanities, mandatory ethics compliance has long been met with scepticism as biomedical models of ethics can map poorly onto methodologies involving complex socio-political and cultural considerations. As a result, tailored ethics training and support as well as access to RECs with the necessary expertise is lacking in some areas, including parts of Europe and low- and middle-income countries. This paper suggests that Generative AI can meaningfully contribute to closing these gaps, illustrating this claim by presenting EthicAlly, a proof-of-concept prototype for an AI-powered ethics support system for social science and humanities researchers. Drawing on constitutional AI technology and a collaborative prompt development methodology, EthicAlly provides structured ethics assessment that incorporates both universal ethics principles and contextual and interpretive considerations relevant to most social science research. In supporting researchers in ethical research design and preparation for REC submission, this kind of system can also contribute to easing the burden on institutional RECs, without attempting to automate or replace human ethical oversight.

Related papers

• Mirror: A Multi-Agent System for AI-Assisted Ethics Review [104.3684024153469]
  Mirror is an agentic framework for AI-assisted ethical review.<n>It integrates ethical reasoning, structured rule interpretation, and multi-agent deliberation within a unified architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T03:38:55Z)
• Report on the Scoping Workshop on AI in Science Education Research 2025 [2.0613397238713778]
  Report summarizes the outcomes of a two-day international scoping workshop on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in science education research.<n>As AI rapidly reshapes scientific practice, classroom learning, and research methods, the field faces both new opportunities and significant challenges.<n>Report concludes with actionable recommendations for training, infrastructure, and standards, along with guidance for funders, policymakers, professional organizations, and academic departments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-18T10:23:22Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [55.2480439325792]
  I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms.<n>I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z)
• Human participants in AI research: Ethics and transparency in practice [0.9608936085613567]
  Research involving human participants has been critical to advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) Yet AI and participatory researchers lack guidelines for ethical research with human participants in AI and ML. This paper seeks to address these concerns and position technical researchers with practical knowledge for their work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T14:12:21Z)
• Towards A Unified Utilitarian Ethics Framework for Healthcare Artificial Intelligence [0.08192907805418582]
  This study attempts to identify the major ethical principles influencing the utility performance of AI at different technological levels. Justice, privacy, bias, lack of regulations, risks, and interpretability are the most important principles to consider for ethical AI. We propose a new utilitarian ethics-based theoretical framework for designing ethical AI for the healthcare domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-26T02:10:58Z)
• Science in the Era of ChatGPT, Large Language Models and Generative AI: Challenges for Research Ethics and How to Respond [3.3504365823045044]
  This paper reviews challenges, ethical and integrity risks in science conduct in the advent of generative AI. The role of AI language models as a research instrument and subject is scrutinized along with ethical implications for scientists, participants and reviewers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T16:23:46Z)
• Ethics for social robotics: A critical analysis [8.778914180886835]
  Social robotics development for the practice of care and European prospects to incorporate these AI-based systems in institutional healthcare contexts call for an urgent ethical reflection. Despite the growing attention to the ethical implications of social robotics, the current debate on one of its central branches, social assistive robotics (SAR), rests upon an impoverished ethical approach. This paper presents and examines some tendencies of this prevailing approach, which have been identified as a result of a critical literature review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T22:18:00Z)
• German AI Start-Ups and AI Ethics: Using A Social Practice Lens for Assessing and Implementing Socio-Technical Innovation [0.0]
  This paper introduces a practice-based approach for understanding ethical AI. We present empirical findings from our study on the operationalization of ethics in German AI start-ups. We suggest that ethical AI practices can be broken down into principles, needs, narratives, materializations, and cultural genealogies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T19:44:39Z)
• Metaethical Perspectives on 'Benchmarking' AI Ethics [81.65697003067841]
  Benchmarks are seen as the cornerstone for measuring technical progress in Artificial Intelligence (AI) research. An increasingly prominent research area in AI is ethics, which currently has no set of benchmarks nor commonly accepted way for measuring the 'ethicality' of an AI system. We argue that it makes more sense to talk about 'values' rather than 'ethics' when considering the possible actions of present and future AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T14:36:39Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• The Short Anthropological Guide to the Study of Ethical AI [91.3755431537592]
  Short guide serves as both an introduction to AI ethics and social science and anthropological perspectives on the development of AI. Aims to provide those unfamiliar with the field with an insight into the societal impact of AI systems and how, in turn, these systems can lead us to rethink how our world operates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T12:25:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.