DRIVE: Dynamic Rule Inference and Verified Evaluation for Constraint-Aware Autonomous Driving

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04066v1
• Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 03:56:06 GMT
• Title: DRIVE: Dynamic Rule Inference and Verified Evaluation for Constraint-Aware Autonomous Driving
• Authors: Longling Geng, Huangxing Li, Viktor Lado Naess, Mert Pilanci,
• Abstract summary: We present DRIVE, a novel framework for Dynamic Rule Inference and Verified Evaluation.<n>D DRIVE achieves 0.0% soft constraint violation rates, smoother trajectories, and stronger generalization across diverse driving scenarios.<n> Verified evaluations further demonstrate the efficiency, explanability, and robustness of the framework for real-world deployment.
• Score: 37.24058519921229
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Understanding and adhering to soft constraints is essential for safe and socially compliant autonomous driving. However, such constraints are often implicit, context-dependent, and difficult to specify explicitly. In this work, we present DRIVE, a novel framework for Dynamic Rule Inference and Verified Evaluation that models and evaluates human-like driving constraints from expert demonstrations. DRIVE leverages exponential-family likelihood modeling to estimate the feasibility of state transitions, constructing a probabilistic representation of soft behavioral rules that vary across driving contexts. These learned rule distributions are then embedded into a convex optimization-based planning module, enabling the generation of trajectories that are not only dynamically feasible but also compliant with inferred human preferences. Unlike prior approaches that rely on fixed constraint forms or purely reward-based modeling, DRIVE offers a unified framework that tightly couples rule inference with trajectory-level decision-making. It supports both data-driven constraint generalization and principled feasibility verification. We validate DRIVE on large-scale naturalistic driving datasets, including inD, highD, and RoundD, and benchmark it against representative inverse constraint learning and planning baselines. Experimental results show that DRIVE achieves 0.0% soft constraint violation rates, smoother trajectories, and stronger generalization across diverse driving scenarios. Verified evaluations further demonstrate the efficiency, explanability, and robustness of the framework for real-world deployment.

Related papers

• Markov Regime-Switching Intelligent Driver Model for Interpretable Car-Following Behavior [19.229274803939983]
  We introduce a regime-switching framework that allows driving behavior to be governed by different IDM parameter sets.<n>We instantiate the framework using a Factorial Hidden Markov Model with IDM dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T17:55:42Z)
• A Framework for Learning Scoring Rules in Autonomous Driving Planning Systems [2.4578723416255754]
  FLoRA is a framework that learns interpretable scoring rules represented in temporal logic.<n>Our approach effectively learns to evaluate driving behavior even though the training data only contains positive examples.<n> Evaluations in closed-loop planning simulations demonstrate that our learned scoring rules outperform existing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T02:06:57Z)
• DRIVE: Dependable Robust Interpretable Visionary Ensemble Framework in Autonomous Driving [1.4104119587524289]
  Recent advancements in autonomous driving have seen a paradigm shift towards end-to-end learning paradigms. These models often sacrifice interpretability, posing significant challenges to trust, safety, and regulatory compliance. We introduce DRIVE, a comprehensive framework designed to improve the dependability and stability of explanations in end-to-end unsupervised driving models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T14:40:47Z)
• DiFSD: Ego-Centric Fully Sparse Paradigm with Uncertainty Denoising and Iterative Refinement for Efficient End-to-End Self-Driving [55.53171248839489]
  We propose an ego-centric fully sparse paradigm, named DiFSD, for end-to-end self-driving.<n>Specifically, DiFSD mainly consists of sparse perception, hierarchical interaction and iterative motion planner.<n>Experiments conducted on nuScenes and Bench2Drive datasets demonstrate the superior planning performance and great efficiency of DiFSD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T15:55:24Z)
• Making Large Language Models Better Planners with Reasoning-Decision Alignment [70.5381163219608]
  We motivate an end-to-end decision-making model based on multimodality-augmented LLM. We propose a reasoning-decision alignment constraint between the paired CoTs and planning results. We dub our proposed large language planners with reasoning-decision alignment as RDA-Driver.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T16:43:47Z)
• SAFE-SIM: Safety-Critical Closed-Loop Traffic Simulation with Diffusion-Controllable Adversaries [94.84458417662407]
  We introduce SAFE-SIM, a controllable closed-loop safety-critical simulation framework. Our approach yields two distinct advantages: 1) generating realistic long-tail safety-critical scenarios that closely reflect real-world conditions, and 2) providing controllable adversarial behavior for more comprehensive and interactive evaluations. We validate our framework empirically using the nuScenes and nuPlan datasets across multiple planners, demonstrating improvements in both realism and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:14:43Z)
• RACER: Rational Artificial Intelligence Car-following-model Enhanced by Reality [46.909086734963665]
  This paper introduces RACER, a cutting-edge deep learning car-following model to predict Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) driving behavior.<n>Unlike conventional models, RACER effectively integrates Rational Driving Constraints (RDCs), crucial tenets of actual driving.<n> RACER excels across key metrics, such as acceleration, velocity, and spacing, registering zero violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T06:21:30Z)
• Integrating Higher-Order Dynamics and Roadway-Compliance into Constrained ILQR-based Trajectory Planning for Autonomous Vehicles [3.200238632208686]
  Trajectory planning aims to produce a globally optimal route for Autonomous Passenger Vehicles. Existing implementations utilizing the vehicle bicycle kinematic model may not guarantee controllable trajectories. We augment this model by higher-order terms, including the first and second-order derivatives of curvature and longitudinal jerk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T22:30:18Z)
• When Demonstrations Meet Generative World Models: A Maximum Likelihood Framework for Offline Inverse Reinforcement Learning [62.00672284480755]
  This paper aims to recover the structure of rewards and environment dynamics that underlie observed actions in a fixed, finite set of demonstrations from an expert agent. Accurate models of expertise in executing a task has applications in safety-sensitive applications such as clinical decision making and autonomous driving.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T04:14:20Z)
• Guided Conditional Diffusion for Controllable Traffic Simulation [42.198185904248994]
  Controllable and realistic traffic simulation is critical for developing and verifying autonomous vehicles. Data-driven approaches generate realistic and human-like behaviors, improving transfer from simulated to real-world traffic. We develop a conditional diffusion model for controllable traffic generation (CTG) that allows users to control desired properties of trajectories at test time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-31T14:44:59Z)
• Congestion-aware Multi-agent Trajectory Prediction for Collision Avoidance [110.63037190641414]
  We propose to learn congestion patterns explicitly and devise a novel "Sense--Learn--Reason--Predict" framework. By decomposing the learning phases into two stages, a "student" can learn contextual cues from a "teacher" while generating collision-free trajectories. In experiments, we demonstrate that the proposed model is able to generate collision-free trajectory predictions in a synthetic dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:33Z)
• Learning Control Barrier Functions from Expert Demonstrations [69.23675822701357]
  We propose a learning based approach to safe controller synthesis based on control barrier functions (CBFs) We analyze an optimization-based approach to learning a CBF that enjoys provable safety guarantees under suitable Lipschitz assumptions on the underlying dynamical system. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first results that learn provably safe control barrier functions from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T12:29:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.