Why Attention Fails: A Taxonomy of Faults in Attention-Based Neural Networks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04925v2
• Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2025 16:22:59 GMT
• Title: Why Attention Fails: A Taxonomy of Faults in Attention-Based Neural Networks
• Abstract summary: We present the first comprehensive empirical study of faults in attention-based neural networks (ABNNs)<n>Our work is based on a systematic analysis of 555 real-world faults collected from 96 projects across ten frameworks, including GitHub, Hugging Face, and Stack Overflow.<n>Our results show that over half of the ABNN faults arise from mechanisms unique to attention architectures.
• Score: 3.261740322943355
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Attention mechanisms are at the core of modern neural architectures, powering systems ranging from ChatGPT to autonomous vehicles and driving a major economic impact. However, high-profile failures, such as ChatGPT's nonsensical outputs or Google's suspension of Gemini's image generation due to attention weight errors, highlight a critical gap: existing deep learning fault taxonomies might not adequately capture the unique failures introduced by attention mechanisms. This gap leaves practitioners without actionable diagnostic guidance. To address this gap, we present the first comprehensive empirical study of faults in attention-based neural networks (ABNNs). Our work is based on a systematic analysis of 555 real-world faults collected from 96 projects across ten frameworks, including GitHub, Hugging Face, and Stack Overflow. Through our analysis, we develop a novel taxonomy comprising seven attention-specific fault categories, not captured by existing work. Our results show that over half of the ABNN faults arise from mechanisms unique to attention architectures. We further analyze the root causes and manifestations of these faults through various symptoms. Finally, by analyzing symptom-root cause associations, we identify four evidence-based diagnostic heuristics that explain 33.0% of attention-specific faults, offering the first systematic diagnostic guidance for attention-based models.

Related papers

• Can Large Language Models Generate Observability-Aware Code? [51.30941152293301]
  We present a systematic study of observability in agent-generated systems.<n>Our results reveal a consistent gap between diagnostic semantics at the source level and fault signals at runtime.<n>We introduce an observability-oriented skill, which can serve as a guidance to improve both diagnostic semantics and fault-signal exposure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-07T03:20:52Z)
• Characterizing Faults in Agentic AI: A Taxonomy of Types, Symptoms, and Root Causes [6.568786173861302]
  Agentic AI systems combine large language model (LLM) reasoning with external invocation tool and long-horizon task execution.<n>There is limited empirical understanding of how faults originate, manifest, and propagate in real-world agentic AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T20:12:29Z)
• How Attention Sinks Emerge in Large Language Models: An Interpretability Perspective [67.08306259095778]
  We identify a simple mechanism that enables the model to recognize token at position zero and induce an attention sink within two transformer blocks.<n>By analyzing training traces from a 30B A3B MoE model trained from scratch, we find that this mechanism emerges early in training and becomes increasingly concentrated in the first two layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T11:10:34Z)
• Cognitive Foundations for Reasoning and Their Manifestation in LLMs [63.12951576410617]
  Large language models (LLMs) solve complex problems yet fail on simpler variants, suggesting they achieve correct outputs through mechanisms fundamentally different from human reasoning.<n>We synthesize cognitive science research into a taxonomy of 28 cognitive elements spanning reasoning invariants, meta-cognitive controls, representations for organizing reasoning & knowledge, and transformation operations.<n>We develop test-time reasoning guidance that automatically scaffold successful structures, improving performance by up to 66.7% on complex problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T18:59:00Z)
• Causal Graph Neural Networks for Healthcare [2.446787923076599]
  Causal graph neural networks address this triple crisis of distribution shift, discrimination, and inscrutability.<n>This Review examines methodological foundations spanning structural causal models, disentangled causal representation learning, and techniques for interventional prediction and counterfactual reasoning on graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T12:34:46Z)
• Demystifying deep search: a holistic evaluation with hint-free multi-hop questions and factorised metrics [89.1999907891494]
  We present WebDetective, a benchmark of hint-free multi-hop questions paired with a controlled Wikipedia sandbox.<n>Our evaluation of 25 state-of-the-art models reveals systematic weaknesses across all architectures.<n>We develop an agentic workflow, EvidenceLoop, that explicitly targets the challenges our benchmark identifies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T07:59:03Z)
• Can Hessian-Based Insights Support Fault Diagnosis in Attention-based Models? [2.9312156642007294]
  We evaluate the potential of Hessian-based analysis for diagnosing faults in attention-based models.<n>We show that Hessian-based metrics can localize instability and pinpoint fault sources more effectively than gradients alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T15:40:32Z)
• Benign Overfitting in Token Selection of Attention Mechanism [34.316270145027616]
  We study the training dynamics and generalization ability of the attention mechanism under classification problems with label noise.<n>We show that, with the characterization of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the token selection of attention mechanism achieves benign overfitting.<n>Our work also demonstrates an interesting delayed acquisition of generalization after an initial phase of overfitting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T08:20:05Z)
• Progressing from Anomaly Detection to Automated Log Labeling and Pioneering Root Cause Analysis [53.24804865821692]
  This study introduces a taxonomy for log anomalies and explores automated data labeling to mitigate labeling challenges. The study envisions a future where root cause analysis follows anomaly detection, unraveling the underlying triggers of anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T15:04:20Z)
• Investigating Human-Identifiable Features Hidden in Adversarial Perturbations [54.39726653562144]
  Our study explores up to five attack algorithms across three datasets. We identify human-identifiable features in adversarial perturbations. Using pixel-level annotations, we extract such features and demonstrate their ability to compromise target models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-28T22:31:29Z)
• Causal Disentanglement Hidden Markov Model for Fault Diagnosis [55.90917958154425]
  We propose a Causal Disentanglement Hidden Markov model (CDHM) to learn the causality in the bearing fault mechanism. Specifically, we make full use of the time-series data and progressively disentangle the vibration signal into fault-relevant and fault-irrelevant factors. To expand the scope of the application, we adopt unsupervised domain adaptation to transfer the learned disentangled representations to other working environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T05:58:45Z)
• Hierarchical Graph Neural Networks for Causal Discovery and Root Cause Localization [52.72490784720227]
  REASON consists of Topological Causal Discovery and Individual Causal Discovery. The Topological Causal Discovery component aims to model the fault propagation in order to trace back to the root causes. The Individual Causal Discovery component focuses on capturing abrupt change patterns of a single system entity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-03T20:17:45Z)
• Attention mechanisms for physiological signal deep learning: which attention should we take? [0.0]
  We experimentally analyze four attention mechanisms (e.g., squeeze-and-excitation, non-local, convolutional block attention module, and multi-head self-attention) and three convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. We evaluate multiple combinations for performance and convergence of physiological signal deep learning model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T07:24:08Z)
• Self-Healing Robust Neural Networks via Closed-Loop Control [23.360913637445964]
  A typical self-healing mechanism is the immune system of a human body. This paper considers the post-training self-healing of a neural network. We propose a closed-loop control formulation to automatically detect and fix the errors caused by various attacks or perturbations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-26T20:25:35Z)
• Attention, please! A survey of Neural Attention Models in Deep Learning [0.0]
  State-of-the-art in Deep Learning is represented by neural attention models in several application domains. This survey provides a comprehensive overview and analysis of developments in neural attention models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T02:42:28Z)
• ACRE: Abstract Causal REasoning Beyond Covariation [90.99059920286484]
  We introduce the Abstract Causal REasoning dataset for systematic evaluation of current vision systems in causal induction. Motivated by the stream of research on causal discovery in Blicket experiments, we query a visual reasoning system with the following four types of questions in either an independent scenario or an interventional scenario. We notice that pure neural models tend towards an associative strategy under their chance-level performance, whereas neuro-symbolic combinations struggle in backward-blocking reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:38Z)
• Improving Automated Visual Fault Detection by Combining a Biologically Plausible Model of Visual Attention with Deep Learning [0.7646713951724012]
  We use attention to improve the automatic detection of defect patterns for wafers within the domain of semiconductor manufacturing. One problem in the domain is that the faults are often very small and have to be detected within a larger size of the chip or even the wafer. We propose a hybrid system of visual attention and a deep neural network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-13T16:50:41Z)
• Graph Backdoor [53.70971502299977]
  We present GTA, the first backdoor attack on graph neural networks (GNNs) GTA departs in significant ways: it defines triggers as specific subgraphs, including both topological structures and descriptive features. It can be instantiated for both transductive (e.g., node classification) and inductive (e.g., graph classification) tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T19:45:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.