Self-Error Adjustment: Theory and Practice of Balancing Individual Performance and Diversity in Ensemble Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04948v1
• Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2025 00:30:26 GMT
• Title: Self-Error Adjustment: Theory and Practice of Balancing Individual Performance and Diversity in Ensemble Learning
• Authors: Rui Zou,
• Abstract summary: Ensemble learning boosts performance by aggregating predictions from multiple base learners.<n>Traditional methods like Bagging and Boosting promote diversity through randomness but lack precise control over the accuracy-diversity trade-off.<n>We propose a novel framework called Self-Error Adjustment (SEA), which decomposes ensemble errors into two distinct components.
• Score: 4.114446284816968
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Ensemble learning boosts performance by aggregating predictions from multiple base learners. A core challenge is balancing individual learner accuracy with diversity. Traditional methods like Bagging and Boosting promote diversity through randomness but lack precise control over the accuracy-diversity trade-off. Negative Correlation Learning (NCL) introduces a penalty to manage this trade-off but suffers from loose theoretical bounds and limited adjustment range. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel framework called Self-Error Adjustment (SEA), which decomposes ensemble errors into two distinct components: individual performance terms, representing the self-error of each base learner, and diversity terms, reflecting interactions among learners. This decomposition allows us to introduce an adjustable parameter into the loss function, offering precise control over the contribution of each component, thus enabling finer regulation of ensemble performance. Compared to NCL and its variants, SEA provides a broader range of effective adjustments and more consistent changes in diversity. Furthermore, we establish tighter theoretical bounds for adjustable ensemble methods and validate them through empirical experiments. Experimental results on several public regression and classification datasets demonstrate that SEA consistently outperforms baseline methods across all tasks. Ablation studies confirm that SEA offers more flexible adjustment capabilities and superior performance in fine-tuning strategies.

Related papers

• Variational Supervised Contrastive Learning [50.79938854370321]
  We propose Variational Supervised Contrastive Learning (VarCon), which reformulates supervised contrastive learning as variational inference over latent class variables.<n>VarCon achieves state-of-the-art performance for contrastive learning frameworks, reaching 79.36% Top-1 accuracy on ImageNet-1K and 78.29% on CIFAR-100 with a ResNet-50 encoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T04:19:12Z)
• Covariance-corrected Whitening Alleviates Network Degeneration on Imbalanced Classification [6.197116272789107]
  Class imbalance is a critical issue in image classification that significantly affects the performance of deep recognition models. We propose a novel framework called Whitening-Net to mitigate the degenerate solutions. In scenarios with extreme class imbalance, the batch covariance statistic exhibits significant fluctuations, impeding the convergence of the whitening operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T10:49:33Z)
• Relaxed Contrastive Learning for Federated Learning [48.96253206661268]
  We propose a novel contrastive learning framework to address the challenges of data heterogeneity in federated learning. Our framework outperforms all existing federated learning approaches by huge margins on the standard benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T04:55:24Z)
• Large Language Models are Miscalibrated In-Context Learners [22.30783674111999]
  In this work, we deliver an in-depth analysis of the behavior across different choices of learning methods.<n>We observe that the miscalibration problem exists across all learning methods in low-resource setups.<n>We find that self-ensembling with max probability produces robust and calibrated predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T11:55:10Z)
• Joint Training of Deep Ensembles Fails Due to Learner Collusion [61.557412796012535]
  Ensembles of machine learning models have been well established as a powerful method of improving performance over a single model. Traditionally, ensembling algorithms train their base learners independently or sequentially with the goal of optimizing their joint performance. We show that directly minimizing the loss of the ensemble appears to rarely be applied in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-26T18:58:07Z)
• Deep Negative Correlation Classification [82.45045814842595]
  Existing deep ensemble methods naively train many different models and then aggregate their predictions. We propose deep negative correlation classification (DNCC) DNCC yields a deep classification ensemble where the individual estimator is both accurate and negatively correlated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T07:35:20Z)
• Revisiting Consistency Regularization for Semi-Supervised Learning [80.28461584135967]
  We propose an improved consistency regularization framework by a simple yet effective technique, FeatDistLoss. Experimental results show that our model defines a new state of the art for various datasets and settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-10T20:46:13Z)
• Holistic Deep Learning [3.718942345103135]
  This paper presents a novel holistic deep learning framework that addresses the challenges of vulnerability to input perturbations, overparametrization, and performance instability. The proposed framework holistically improves accuracy, robustness, sparsity, and stability over standard deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T14:46:32Z)
• Repulsive Deep Ensembles are Bayesian [6.544954579068863]
  We introduce a kernelized repulsive term in the update rule of the deep ensembles. We show that this simple modification not only enforces and maintains diversity among the members but, even more importantly, transforms the maximum a posteriori inference into proper Bayesian inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-22T09:50:28Z)
• DICE: Diversity in Deep Ensembles via Conditional Redundancy Adversarial Estimation [109.11580756757611]
  Deep ensembles perform better than a single network thanks to the diversity among their members. Recent approaches regularize predictions to increase diversity; however, they also drastically decrease individual members' performances. We introduce a novel training criterion called DICE: it increases diversity by reducing spurious correlations among features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-14T10:53:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.