A Systematic Literature Review of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Techniques, Metrics, and Challenges

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06401v3
• Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 16:35:32 GMT
• Title: A Systematic Literature Review of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Techniques, Metrics, and Challenges
• Authors: Andrew Brown, Muhammad Roman, Barry Devereux,
• Abstract summary: This systematic review of the research literature on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) provides a focused analysis of the most highly cited studies published between 2020 and 2025.
• Score: 1.774905308388066
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This systematic review of the research literature on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) provides a focused analysis of the most highly cited studies published between 2020 and May 2025. A total of 128 articles met our inclusion criteria. The records were retrieved from ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and the Digital Bibliography and Library Project (DBLP). RAG couples a neural retriever with a generative language model, grounding output in up-to-date, non-parametric memory while retaining the semantic generalisation stored in model weights. Guided by the PRISMA 2020 framework, we (i) specify explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria based on citation count and research questions, (ii) catalogue datasets, architectures, and evaluation practices, and (iii) synthesise empirical evidence on the effectiveness and limitations of RAG. To mitigate citation-lag bias, we applied a lower citation-count threshold to papers published in 2025 so that emerging breakthroughs with naturally fewer citations were still captured. This review clarifies the current research landscape, highlights methodological gaps, and charts priority directions for future research.

Related papers

• Enhancing Scientific Literature Chatbots with Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Performance Evaluation of Vector and Graph-Based Systems [1.0832844764942349]
  This paper investigates the enhancement of scientific literature through retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)<n>The proposed chatbots leverages both structured (graph) and unstructured (vector) databases to access scientific articles and gray literature.<n> Benchmark test sets were generated using a GPT model, with selected outputs annotated for evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T21:42:02Z)
• Beyond Memorization: Reasoning-Driven Synthesis as a Mitigation Strategy Against Benchmark Contamination [77.69093448529455]
  We present an empirical study using an infinitely scalable framework to synthesize research-level QA directly from arXiv papers.<n>We evaluate a lack of significant performance decay near knowledge cutoff dates for models of various sizes, developers, and release dates.<n>We hypothesize that the multi-step reasoning required by our synthesis pipeline offered additional complexity that goes deeper than shallow memorization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T16:41:37Z)
• SurveyGen: Quality-Aware Scientific Survey Generation with Large Language Models [14.855783196702191]
  We present SurveyGen, a large-scale dataset comprising over 4,200 human-written surveys across diverse scientific domains.<n>We build QUAL-SG, a novel quality-aware framework for survey generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T04:22:23Z)
• Modelling and Classifying the Components of a Literature Review [0.0]
  We present a novel benchmark comprising 700 sentences manually annotated by domain experts and 2,240 sentences automatically labelled using large language models (LLMs)<n>The experiments yield several novel insights that advance the state of the art in this challenging domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-06T11:30:07Z)
• HySemRAG: A Hybrid Semantic Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework for Automated Literature Synthesis and Methodological Gap Analysis [55.2480439325792]
  HySemRAG is a framework that combines Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) pipelines with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)<n>System addresses limitations in existing RAG architectures through a multi-layered approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-01T20:30:42Z)
• Advancing Offline Handwritten Text Recognition: A Systematic Review of Data Augmentation and Generation Techniques [4.5220419118352915]
  This paper presents a survey of offline handwritten data augmentation and generation techniques.<n>We examine traditional augmentation methods alongside recent advances in deep learning.<n>We explore the challenges associated with generating diverse and realistic handwriting samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-08T12:03:58Z)
• BAGELS: Benchmarking the Automated Generation and Extraction of Limitations from Scholarly Text [6.682911432177815]
  In scientific research, limitations refer to the shortcomings, constraints, or weaknesses within a study.<n>Authors often a) underreport them in the paper text and b) use hedging strategies to satisfy editorial requirements.<n>This underreporting behavior, along with an explosion in the number of publications, has created a pressing need to automatically extract or generate such limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T06:04:02Z)
• Automating Bibliometric Analysis with Sentence Transformers and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): A Pilot Study in Semantic and Contextual Search for Customized Literature Characterization for High-Impact Urban Research [2.1728621449144763]
  Bibliometric analysis is essential for understanding research trends, scope, and impact in urban science. Traditional methods, relying on keyword searches, often fail to uncover valuable insights not explicitly stated in article titles or keywords. We leverage Generative AI models, specifically transformers and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), to automate and enhance bibliometric analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T05:13:27Z)
• Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisions [62.12545440385489]
  Large language models (LLMs) have brought substantial advancements in text generation, but their potential for enhancing classification tasks remains underexplored. We propose a framework for thoroughly investigating fine-tuning LLMs for classification, including both generation- and encoding-based approaches. We instantiate this framework in edit intent classification (EIC), a challenging and underexplored classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T20:48:28Z)
• Taxonomy Tree Generation from Citation Graph [15.188580557890942]
  HiGTL is a novel end-to-end framework guided by human-provided instructions or preferred topics.<n>We develop a novel taxonomy node verbalization strategy that iteratively generates central concepts for each cluster.<n>Experiments demonstrate that HiGTL effectively produces coherent, high-quality concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T13:02:03Z)
• Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey [73.87651986156006]
  We present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for large language models (LLMs) We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive, two for bias evaluation, and one for mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T00:32:55Z)
• Enhancing Scientific Papers Summarization with Citation Graph [78.65955304229863]
  We redefine the task of scientific papers summarization by utilizing their citation graph. We construct a novel scientific papers summarization dataset Semantic Scholar Network (SSN) which contains 141K research papers in different domains. Our model can achieve competitive performance when compared with the pretrained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T11:13:35Z)
• A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learning [83.47804123133719]
  The last decade has seen a surge of research in this area due to the unprecedented success of deep learning. This paper fills the gap by reviewing the state-of-the-art approaches from 1961 to 2021. We create a taxonomy for text classification according to the text involved and the models used for feature extraction and classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-02T00:09:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.