Using Imperfect Synthetic Data in Downstream Inference Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06635v1
• Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2025 18:32:52 GMT
• Title: Using Imperfect Synthetic Data in Downstream Inference Tasks
• Authors: Yewon Byun, Shantanu Gupta, Zachary C. Lipton, Rachel Leah Childers, Bryan Wilder,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new estimator based on generalized method of moments.<n>We find that interactions between the moment residuals of synthetic data and those of real data can improve estimates of the target parameter.
• Score: 50.40949503799331
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Predictions and generations from large language models are increasingly being explored as an aid to computational social science and human subject research in limited data regimes. While previous technical work has explored the potential to use model-predicted labels for unlabeled data in a principled manner, there is increasing interest in using large language models to generate entirely new synthetic samples (also termed as synthetic simulations), such as in responses to surveys. However, it is not immediately clear by what means practitioners can combine such data with real data and yet produce statistically valid conclusions upon them. In this work, we introduce a new estimator based on generalized method of moments, providing a hyperparameter-free solution with strong theoretical guarantees to address the challenge at hand. Surprisingly, we find that interactions between the moment residuals of synthetic data and those of real data can improve estimates of the target parameter. We empirically validate the finite-sample performance of our estimator across different regression tasks in computational social science applications, demonstrating large empirical gains.

Related papers

• Harnessing Synthetic Data from Generative AI for Statistical Inference [6.0353292419288485]
  This paper reviews the current landscape of synthetic data generation and use from a statistical perspective.<n>We survey major classes of modern generative models, their intended use cases, and the benefits they offer.<n>We examine common pitfalls that arise when synthetic data are treated as surrogates for real observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T17:24:41Z)
• Should I use Synthetic Data for That? An Analysis of the Suitability of Synthetic Data for Data Sharing and Augmentation [16.434161021014692]
  We study three prominent use cases: (1) Sharing synthetic data as a proxy for proprietary datasets to enable statistical analyses while protecting privacy, (2) Augmenting machine learning training sets with synthetic data to improve model performance, and (3) Augmenting datasets with synthetic data to reduce variance in statistical estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T17:52:57Z)
• Improving the Generation and Evaluation of Synthetic Data for Downstream Medical Causal Inference [89.5628648718851]
  Causal inference is essential for developing and evaluating medical interventions.<n>Real-world medical datasets are often difficult to access due to regulatory barriers.<n>We present STEAM: a novel method for generating Synthetic data for Treatment Effect Analysis in Medicine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-21T16:16:00Z)
• Debiasing Synthetic Data Generated by Deep Generative Models [40.165159490379146]
  Deep generative models (DGMs) for synthetic data generation induce bias and imprecision in synthetic data analyses.<n>We propose a new strategy that targets synthetic data created by DGMs for specific data analyses.<n>Our approach accounts for biases, enhances convergence rates, and facilitates the calculation of estimators with easily approximated large sample variances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T19:24:34Z)
• Unveiling the Flaws: Exploring Imperfections in Synthetic Data and Mitigation Strategies for Large Language Models [89.88010750772413]
  Synthetic data has been proposed as a solution to address the issue of high-quality data scarcity in the training of large language models (LLMs) Our work delves into these specific flaws associated with question-answer (Q-A) pairs, a prevalent type of synthetic data, and presents a method based on unlearning techniques to mitigate these flaws. Our work has yielded key insights into the effective use of synthetic data, aiming to promote more robust and efficient LLM training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T08:38:59Z)
• Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models [56.84592466204185]
  This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop. We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models. We present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T02:08:09Z)
• The Real Deal Behind the Artificial Appeal: Inferential Utility of Tabular Synthetic Data [40.165159490379146]
  We show that the rate of false-positive findings (type 1 error) will be unacceptably high, even when the estimates are unbiased. Despite the use of a previously proposed correction factor, this problem persists for deep generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-13T02:04:41Z)
• Boosting Data Analytics With Synthetic Volume Expansion [3.568650932986342]
  This article explores the effectiveness of statistical methods on synthetic data and the privacy risks of synthetic data. A key finding within this framework is the generational effect, which reveals that the error rate of statistical methods on synthetic data decreases with the addition of more synthetic data but may eventually rise or stabilize.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T01:57:27Z)
• Reimagining Synthetic Tabular Data Generation through Data-Centric AI: A Comprehensive Benchmark [56.8042116967334]
  Synthetic data serves as an alternative in training machine learning models. ensuring that synthetic data mirrors the complex nuances of real-world data is a challenging task. This paper explores the potential of integrating data-centric AI techniques to guide the synthetic data generation process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-25T20:32:02Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• Beyond Privacy: Navigating the Opportunities and Challenges of Synthetic Data [91.52783572568214]
  Synthetic data may become a dominant force in the machine learning world, promising a future where datasets can be tailored to individual needs. We discuss which fundamental challenges the community needs to overcome for wider relevance and application of synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-07T16:38:40Z)
• Foundations of Bayesian Learning from Synthetic Data [1.6249267147413522]
  We use a Bayesian paradigm to characterise the updating of model parameters when learning on synthetic data. Recent results from general Bayesian updating support a novel and robust approach to synthetic-learning founded on decision theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-16T21:49:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.