InterChart: Benchmarking Visual Reasoning Across Decomposed and Distributed Chart Information
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07630v1
- Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 05:19:23 GMT
- Title: InterChart: Benchmarking Visual Reasoning Across Decomposed and Distributed Chart Information
- Authors: Anirudh Iyengar Kaniyar Narayana Iyengar, Srija Mukhopadhyay, Adnan Qidwai, Shubhankar Singh, Dan Roth, Vivek Gupta,
- Abstract summary: We introduce InterChart, a diagnostic benchmark that evaluates how well vision-language models (VLMs) reason across multiple related charts.<n>We organize the benchmark into three tiers of increasing difficulty: factual reasoning over individual charts, integrative analysis across synthetically aligned chart sets, and semantic inference over visually complex, real-world chart pairs.
- Score: 44.79888692172093
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: We introduce InterChart, a diagnostic benchmark that evaluates how well vision-language models (VLMs) reason across multiple related charts, a task central to real-world applications such as scientific reporting, financial analysis, and public policy dashboards. Unlike prior benchmarks focusing on isolated, visually uniform charts, InterChart challenges models with diverse question types ranging from entity inference and trend correlation to numerical estimation and abstract multi-step reasoning grounded in 2-3 thematically or structurally related charts. We organize the benchmark into three tiers of increasing difficulty: (1) factual reasoning over individual charts, (2) integrative analysis across synthetically aligned chart sets, and (3) semantic inference over visually complex, real-world chart pairs. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art open and closed-source VLMs reveals consistent and steep accuracy declines as chart complexity increases. We find that models perform better when we decompose multi-entity charts into simpler visual units, underscoring their struggles with cross-chart integration. By exposing these systematic limitations, InterChart provides a rigorous framework for advancing multimodal reasoning in complex, multi-visual environments.
Related papers
- ChartAnchor: Chart Grounding with Structural-Semantic Fidelity [19.798612765001746]
Chart grounding refers to the bidirectional alignment between a chart's visual appearance and the structured semantics.<n>ChartAnchor is a benchmark of 8k+ chart-table-code triples spanning 30 chart types drawn from diverse real-world and augmented sources.<n>A multi-level evaluation framework integrates semantic validation, stylistic analysis, and perceptual metrics to assess both structural and content-level correctness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-30T18:28:09Z) - ChartPoint: Guiding MLLMs with Grounding Reflection for Chart Reasoning [54.86473583610112]
We propose PointCoT, which integrates reflective interaction into chain-of-thought reasoning in charts.<n>By prompting MLLMs to generate bounding boxes and re-render charts based on location annotations, we establish connections between textual reasoning steps and visual grounding regions.<n>We develop two instruction-tuned models, ChartPointQ2 and ChartPointQ2.5, which outperform state-of-the-art across several chart benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T04:01:55Z) - BigCharts-R1: Enhanced Chart Reasoning with Visual Reinforcement Finetuning [51.472854950300416]
We propose BigCharts, a dataset creation pipeline that generates visually diverse chart images.<n>Unlike purely synthetic datasets, BigCharts incorporates real-world data, ensuring authenticity and visual diversity.<n>By introducing novel reward signals specifically designed for chart reasoning, our approach enhances model robustness and generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T13:39:17Z) - CHAOS: Chart Analysis with Outlier Samples [31.64244745491319]
CHAOS is a benchmark to evaluate Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) against chart perturbations.<n>The benchmark includes 13 state-of-the-art MLLMs divided into three groups according to the training scope and data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T19:26:49Z) - Socratic Chart: Cooperating Multiple Agents for Robust SVG Chart Understanding [14.75820681491341]
Existing benchmarks reveal reliance on text-based shortcuts and probabilistic pattern-matching rather than genuine visual reasoning.<n>We propose Socratic Chart, a new framework that transforms chart images into Scalable Vector Graphics representations.<n>Our framework surpasses state-of-the-art models in accurately capturing chart primitives and improving reasoning performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-14T00:07:39Z) - RefChartQA: Grounding Visual Answer on Chart Images through Instruction Tuning [63.599057862999]
RefChartQA is a novel benchmark that integrates Chart Question Answering (ChartQA) with visual grounding.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that incorporating spatial awareness via grounding improves response accuracy by over 15%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-29T15:50:08Z) - Graph-Based Multimodal Contrastive Learning for Chart Question Answering [11.828192162922436]
This work introduces a novel joint multimodal scene graph framework that explicitly models the relationships among chart components and their underlying structures.<n>The framework integrates both visual and textual graphs to capture structural and semantic characteristics.<n>A graph contrastive learning strategy aligns node representations across modalities enabling their seamless incorporation into a transformer decoder as soft prompts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-08T06:27:07Z) - ChartGemma: Visual Instruction-tuning for Chart Reasoning in the Wild [28.643565008567172]
We introduce ChartGemma, a novel chart understanding and reasoning model developed over PaliGemma.
Rather than relying on underlying data tables, ChartGemma is trained on instruction-tuning data generated directly from chart images.
Our simple approach achieves state-of-the-art results across $5$ benchmarks spanning chart summarization, question answering, and fact-checking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-04T22:16:40Z) - ChartX & ChartVLM: A Versatile Benchmark and Foundation Model for Complicated Chart Reasoning [55.22996841790139]
We benchmark the ability of off-the-shelf Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in the chart domain.<n>We construct ChartX, a multi-modal evaluation set covering 18 chart types, 7 chart tasks, 22 disciplinary topics, and high-quality chart data.<n>We develop ChartVLM to offer a new perspective on handling multi-modal tasks that strongly depend on interpretable patterns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-19T14:48:23Z) - Model-Agnostic Graph Regularization for Few-Shot Learning [60.64531995451357]
We present a comprehensive study on graph embedded few-shot learning.
We introduce a graph regularization approach that allows a deeper understanding of the impact of incorporating graph information between labels.
Our approach improves the performance of strong base learners by up to 2% on Mini-ImageNet and 6.7% on ImageNet-FS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-14T05:28:13Z) - Multi-view Graph Learning by Joint Modeling of Consistency and
Inconsistency [65.76554214664101]
Graph learning has emerged as a promising technique for multi-view clustering with its ability to learn a unified and robust graph from multiple views.
We propose a new multi-view graph learning framework, which for the first time simultaneously models multi-view consistency and multi-view inconsistency in a unified objective function.
Experiments on twelve multi-view datasets have demonstrated the robustness and efficiency of the proposed approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-24T06:11:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.