A Survey on Training-free Alignment of Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09016v4
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:08:47 GMT
- Title: A Survey on Training-free Alignment of Large Language Models
- Authors: Birong Pan, Yongqi Li, Weiyu Zhang, Wenpeng Lu, Mayi Xu, Shen Zhou, Yuanyuan Zhu, Ming Zhong, Tieyun Qian,
- Abstract summary: Training-free (TF) alignment techniques offer a promising alternative to resource-intensive fine-tuning.<n>This paper presents the first systematic review of TF alignment methods.
- Score: 26.81373900601774
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The alignment of large language models (LLMs) aims to ensure their outputs adhere to human values, ethical standards, and legal norms. Traditional alignment methods often rely on resource-intensive fine-tuning (FT), which may suffer from knowledge degradation and face challenges in scenarios where the model accessibility or computational resources are constrained. In contrast, training-free (TF) alignment techniques--leveraging in-context learning, decoding-time adjustments, and post-generation corrections--offer a promising alternative by enabling alignment without heavily retraining LLMs, making them adaptable to both open-source and closed-source environments. This paper presents the first systematic review of TF alignment methods, categorizing them by stages of pre-decoding, in-decoding, and post-decoding. For each stage, we provide a detailed examination from the viewpoint of LLMs and multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), highlighting their mechanisms and limitations. Furthermore, we identify key challenges and future directions, paving the way for more inclusive and effective TF alignment techniques. By synthesizing and organizing the rapidly growing body of research, this survey offers a guidance for practitioners and advances the development of safer and more reliable LLMs.
Related papers
- From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Practical Guide to Code Intelligence [150.3696990310269]
Large language models (LLMs) have transformed automated software development by enabling direct translation of natural language descriptions into functional code.<n>We provide a comprehensive synthesis and practical guide (a series of analytic and probing experiments) about code LLMs.<n>We analyze the code capability of the general LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, LLaMA) and code-specialized LLMs (StarCoder, Code LLaMA, DeepSeek-Coder, and QwenCoder)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-23T17:09:34Z) - A Systematic Survey on Large Language Models for Evolutionary Optimization: From Modeling to Solving [26.501685261132124]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being explored for tackling optimization problems.<n>Despite rapid progress, the field still lacks a unified synthesis and a systematic taxonomy.<n>This survey addresses this gap by providing a comprehensive review of recent developments and organizing them within a structured framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-10T04:05:54Z) - Discrete Tokenization for Multimodal LLMs: A Comprehensive Survey [69.45421620616486]
This work presents the first structured taxonomy and analysis of discrete tokenization methods designed for large language models (LLMs)<n>We categorize 8 representative VQ variants that span classical and modern paradigms and analyze their algorithmic principles, training dynamics, and integration challenges with LLM pipelines.<n>We identify key challenges including codebook collapse, unstable gradient estimation, and modality-specific encoding constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-21T10:52:14Z) - Large Language Model Unlearning for Source Code [65.42425213605114]
PROD is a novel unlearning approach that enables LLMs to forget undesired code content while preserving their code generation capabilities.<n>Our evaluation demonstrates that PROD achieves superior balance between forget quality and model utility compared to existing unlearning approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-20T16:27:59Z) - Textual Bayes: Quantifying Uncertainty in LLM-Based Systems [16.449972045324916]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly capable of solving challenging real-world tasks.<n> accurately quantifying their uncertainty remains a critical open problem.<n>This challenge is compounded by the closed-source, black-box nature of many state-of-the-art LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-11T18:00:00Z) - Post-Incorporating Code Structural Knowledge into LLMs via In-Context Learning for Code Translation [10.77747590700758]
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved significant advancements in software mining.<n> handling the syntactic structure of source code remains a challenge.<n>This paper employs incontext learning (ICL) to integrate code structural knowledge into pre-trained LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-28T10:59:42Z) - LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Models [131.10969986056]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed the natural language processing landscape and brought to life diverse applications.<n>Post-training methods enable LLMs to refine their knowledge, improve reasoning, enhance factual accuracy, and align more effectively with user intents and ethical considerations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-28T18:59:54Z) - LLM-Lasso: A Robust Framework for Domain-Informed Feature Selection and Regularization [59.75242204923353]
We introduce LLM-Lasso, a framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to guide feature selection in Lasso regression.<n>LLMs generate penalty factors for each feature, which are converted into weights for the Lasso penalty using a simple, tunable model.<n>Features identified as more relevant by the LLM receive lower penalties, increasing their likelihood of being retained in the final model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-15T02:55:22Z) - LLMs are Also Effective Embedding Models: An In-depth Overview [41.34518828980852]
Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing by achieving state-of-the-art performance across various tasks.<n>Recently, their effectiveness as embedding models has gained attention, marking a paradigm shift from traditional encoder-only models like ELMo and BERT to decoder-only, large-scale LLMs like GPT, LLaMA, and Mistral.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-17T06:48:24Z) - Investigating Privacy Bias in Training Data of Language Models [1.3167450470598043]
A privacy bias refers to the skew in the appropriateness of information flows within a given context.<n>This skew may either align with existing expectations or signal a symptom of systemic issues.<n>We present a novel approach to assess the privacy biases using a contextual integrity-based methodology.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-05T17:50:31Z) - ABC Align: Large Language Model Alignment for Safety & Accuracy [0.0]
We present ABC Align, a novel alignment methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs)
We combine a set of data and methods that build on recent breakthroughs in synthetic data generation, preference optimisation, and post-training model quantisation.
Our unified approach mitigates bias and improves accuracy, while preserving reasoning capability, as measured against standard benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-01T06:06:25Z) - How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback.
Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities.
We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z) - DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Models [59.63643988872571]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are nowadays expected to generate content aligned with human preferences.
We propose DeAL, a framework that allows the user to customize reward functions and enables Detime Alignment of LLMs.
Our experiments show that we can DeAL with fine-grained trade-offs, improve adherence to alignment objectives, and address residual gaps in LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-05T06:12:29Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.