Integrating Feature Attention and Temporal Modeling for Collaborative Financial Risk Assessment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09399v2
• Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 04:24:53 GMT
• Title: Integrating Feature Attention and Temporal Modeling for Collaborative Financial Risk Assessment
• Abstract summary: Without sharing raw data, the method enables joint modeling and risk identification across multiple institutions.<n>The method enhances the scope and efficiency of risk identification while preserving data sovereignty.
• Score: 4.0574735047490575
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper addresses the challenges of data privacy and collaborative modeling in cross-institution financial risk analysis. It proposes a risk assessment framework based on federated learning. Without sharing raw data, the method enables joint modeling and risk identification across multiple institutions. This is achieved by incorporating a feature attention mechanism and temporal modeling structure. Specifically, the model adopts a distributed optimization strategy. Each financial institution trains a local sub-model. The model parameters are protected using differential privacy and noise injection before being uploaded. A central server then aggregates these parameters to generate a global model. This global model is used for systemic risk identification. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method, multiple experiments are conducted. These evaluate communication efficiency, model accuracy, systemic risk detection, and cross-market generalization. The results show that the proposed model outperforms both traditional centralized methods and existing federated learning variants across all evaluation metrics. It demonstrates strong modeling capabilities and practical value in sensitive financial environments. The method enhances the scope and efficiency of risk identification while preserving data sovereignty. It offers a secure and efficient solution for intelligent financial risk analysis.

Related papers

• Model Validation of Agentic AI Systems: A POMDP-Based Framework for Belief-State, Forecast, and Policy Validation [0.0]
  This paper proposes a model validation framework for agentic AI based on Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs)<n>The framework decomposes autonomous decision making into information, beliefs, forecasts, actions, and utility, allowing each component to be validated independently.<n>The principal contribution of the paper is a practical framework for extending established model risk management concepts to autonomous AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-16T00:40:55Z)
• Enhancing a Risk Model by Adding Transient Statistical Factors [90.40844650665713]
  Estimating asset returns is a key component of financial portfolio construction and evaluation.<n>We propose a systematic method based on maximum likelihood estimation to enhance an existing factor model.<n>We show that the proposed extension captures structure in the returns that is missed by the original model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T04:15:24Z)
• Hallucination Detection and Mitigation in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) offer transformative potential for high-stakes domains like finance and law.<n>Their tendency to hallucinate, generating factually incorrect or unsupported content, poses a critical reliability risk.<n>This paper introduces a comprehensive framework for hallucination management, built on a continuous improvement cycle driven by root cause awareness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-14T23:19:37Z)
• The Role of Risk Modeling in Advanced AI Risk Management [33.357295564462284]
  Rapidly advancing artificial intelligence (AI) systems introduce novel, uncertain, and potentially catastrophic risks.<n>Managing these risks requires a mature risk-management infrastructure whose cornerstone is rigorous risk modeling.<n>We argue that advanced-AI governance should adopt a similar dual approach and that verifiable, provably-safe AI architectures are urgently needed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-09T15:37:33Z)
• FedGPS: Statistical Rectification Against Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning [103.45987800174724]
  Federated Learning (FL) confronts a significant challenge known as data heterogeneity, which impairs model performance and convergence.<n>We propose textbfFedGPS, a novel framework that seamlessly integrates statistical distribution and gradient information from others.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-23T06:10:11Z)
• Enhancing Credit Risk Prediction: A Meta-Learning Framework Integrating Baseline Models, LASSO, and ECOC for Superior Accuracy [7.254744067646655]
  This research proposes a comprehensive meta-learning framework that synthesizes multiple complementary models.<n>We implement Permutation Feature Importance analysis for each prediction class across all constituent models.<n>Results demonstrate that our framework significantly enhances the accuracy of financial entity classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T14:09:04Z)
• Enhancing Model Privacy in Federated Learning with Random Masking and Quantization [46.915409150222494]
  The rise of large language models (LLMs) has introduced new challenges in distributed systems.<n>This highlights the need for a federated learning approach that can safeguard both sensitive data and proprietary models.<n>We propose FedQSN, a federated learning approach that leverages random masking to obscure a subnetwork of model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T10:34:13Z)
• Secure Generalization through Stochastic Bidirectional Parameter Updates Using Dual-Gradient Mechanism [6.03163048890944]
  Federated learning (FL) has gained increasing attention due to privacy-preserving collaborative training on decentralized clients.<n>Recent research has underscored the risk of exposing private data to adversaries, even within FL frameworks.<n>We generate diverse models for each client by using systematic perturbations in model parameters at a fine-grained level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-03T02:06:57Z)
• A Deep Learning Framework Integrating CNN and BiLSTM for Financial Systemic Risk Analysis and Prediction [17.6825558707504]
  This study proposes a deep learning model based on the combination of convolutional neural network (CNN) and bidirectional long short-term memory network (BiLSTM)<n>The model first uses CNN to extract local patterns of multidimensional features of financial markets, and then models the bidirectional dependency of time series through BiLSTM.<n>The results show that the model is significantly superior to traditional single models in terms of accuracy, recall, and F1 score.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T07:57:11Z)
• Efficient and Robust Regularized Federated Recommendation [52.24782464815489]
  The recommender system (RSRS) addresses both user preference and privacy concerns. We propose a novel method that incorporates non-uniform gradient descent to improve communication efficiency. RFRecF's superior robustness compared to diverse baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T12:10:20Z)
• A Formal Framework for Assessing and Mitigating Emergent Security Risks in Generative AI Models: Bridging Theory and Dynamic Risk Mitigation [0.3413711585591077]
  As generative AI systems, including large language models (LLMs) and diffusion models, advance rapidly, their growing adoption has led to new and complex security risks. This paper introduces a novel formal framework for categorizing and mitigating these emergent security risks. We identify previously under-explored risks, including latent space exploitation, multi-modal cross-attack vectors, and feedback-loop-induced model degradation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T02:51:32Z)
• EARBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [53.717918131568936]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction.<n>Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results.<n>However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges.<n>This study introduces EARBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• Towards Secure and Private AI: A Framework for Decentralized Inference [14.526663289437584]
  Large multimodal foundational models present challenges in scalability, reliability, and potential misuse.<n>Decentralized systems offer a solution by distributing workload and mitigating central points of failure.<n>We address these challenges with a comprehensive framework designed for responsible AI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-28T05:09:17Z)
• Enhancing Security in Federated Learning through Adaptive Consensus-Based Model Update Validation [2.28438857884398]
  This paper introduces an advanced approach for fortifying Federated Learning (FL) systems against label-flipping attacks. We propose a consensus-based verification process integrated with an adaptive thresholding mechanism. Our results indicate a significant mitigation of label-flipping attacks, bolstering the FL system's resilience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T20:54:56Z)
• The Risk of Federated Learning to Skew Fine-Tuning Features and Underperform Out-of-Distribution Robustness [50.52507648690234]
  Federated learning has the risk of skewing fine-tuning features and compromising the robustness of the model. We introduce three robustness indicators and conduct experiments across diverse robust datasets. Our approach markedly enhances the robustness across diverse scenarios, encompassing various parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T09:18:51Z)
• Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs [54.262044436203965]
  We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models. It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T09:03:18Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.