Leveraging Failed Samples: A Few-Shot and Training-Free Framework for Generalized Deepfake Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09475v1
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 04:06:09 GMT
- Title: Leveraging Failed Samples: A Few-Shot and Training-Free Framework for Generalized Deepfake Detection
- Authors: Shibo Yao, Renshuai Tao, Xiaolong Zheng, Chao Liang, Chunjie Zhang,
- Abstract summary: Few-shot Training-free Network (FTNet) for real-world few-shot deepfake detection.<n>FTNet uses only one fake samplefrom an evaluation set, mimicking the scenario where new samples emerge in the real world and can be gathered for use, without any training or parameter updates.<n>We conduct a comprehensive analysis of AI-generated images from 29 different generative models and achieve a new SoTA performance, with an average improvement of 8.7% compared to existing methods.
- Score: 23.97926666305552
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recent deepfake detection studies often treat unseen sample detection as a ``zero-shot" task, training on images generated by known models but generalizing to unknown ones. A key real-world challenge arises when a model performs poorly on unknown samples, yet these samples remain available for analysis. This highlights that it should be approached as a ``few-shot" task, where effectively utilizing a small number of samples can lead to significant improvement. Unlike typical few-shot tasks focused on semantic understanding, deepfake detection prioritizes image realism, which closely mirrors real-world distributions. In this work, we propose the Few-shot Training-free Network (FTNet) for real-world few-shot deepfake detection. Simple yet effective, FTNet differs from traditional methods that rely on large-scale known data for training. Instead, FTNet uses only one fake samplefrom an evaluation set, mimicking the scenario where new samples emerge in the real world and can be gathered for use, without any training or parameter updates. During evaluation, each test sample is compared to the known fake and real samples, and it is classified based on the category of the nearest sample. We conduct a comprehensive analysis of AI-generated images from 29 different generative models and achieve a new SoTA performance, with an average improvement of 8.7\% compared to existing methods. This work introduces a fresh perspective on real-world deepfake detection: when the model struggles to generalize on a few-shot sample, leveraging the failed samples leads to better performance.
Related papers
- A Quality-Centric Framework for Generic Deepfake Detection [41.1730636042585]
We propose a novel quality-centric framework for generic deepfake detection.<n>It is composed of a Quality Evaluator, a low-quality data enhancement module, and a learning pacing strategy.<n>Our framework is inspired by curriculum learning, which is designed to gradually enable the detector to learn more challenging deepfake samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-08T05:14:46Z) - Importance of Disjoint Sampling in Conventional and Transformer Models for Hyperspectral Image Classification [2.1223532600703385]
This paper presents an innovative disjoint sampling approach for training SOTA models on Hyperspectral image classification (HSIC) tasks.
By separating training, validation, and test data without overlap, the proposed method facilitates a fairer evaluation of how well a model can classify pixels it was not exposed to during training or validation.
This rigorous methodology is critical for advancing SOTA models and their real-world application to large-scale land mapping with Hyperspectral sensors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-23T11:40:52Z) - Projection Regret: Reducing Background Bias for Novelty Detection via
Diffusion Models [72.07462371883501]
We propose emphProjection Regret (PR), an efficient novelty detection method that mitigates the bias of non-semantic information.
PR computes the perceptual distance between the test image and its diffusion-based projection to detect abnormality.
Extensive experiments demonstrate that PR outperforms the prior art of generative-model-based novelty detection methods by a significant margin.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-05T09:44:47Z) - Fake It Till You Make It: Near-Distribution Novelty Detection by
Score-Based Generative Models [54.182955830194445]
existing models either fail or face a dramatic drop under the so-called near-distribution" setting.
We propose to exploit a score-based generative model to produce synthetic near-distribution anomalous data.
Our method improves the near-distribution novelty detection by 6% and passes the state-of-the-art by 1% to 5% across nine novelty detection benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-28T02:02:53Z) - Lightweight Detection of Out-of-Distribution and Adversarial Samples via
Channel Mean Discrepancy [14.103271496247551]
We introduce Channel Mean Discrepancy (CMD), a model-agnostic distance metric for evaluating the statistics of features extracted by classification models.
We experimentally demonstrate that CMD magnitude is significantly smaller for legitimate samples than for OOD and adversarial samples.
Preliminary results show that our simple yet effective method outperforms several state-of-the-art approaches to detecting OOD and adversarial samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-23T04:15:53Z) - Few-shot Weakly-Supervised Object Detection via Directional Statistics [55.97230224399744]
We propose a probabilistic multiple instance learning approach for few-shot Common Object Localization (COL) and few-shot Weakly Supervised Object Detection (WSOD)
Our model simultaneously learns the distribution of the novel objects and localizes them via expectation-maximization steps.
Our experiments show that the proposed method, despite being simple, outperforms strong baselines in few-shot COL and WSOD, as well as large-scale WSOD tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-25T22:34:16Z) - One for More: Selecting Generalizable Samples for Generalizable ReID
Model [92.40951770273972]
This paper proposes a one-for-more training objective that takes the generalization ability of selected samples as a loss function.
Our proposed one-for-more based sampler can be seamlessly integrated into the ReID training framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-10T06:37:09Z) - CSI: Novelty Detection via Contrastive Learning on Distributionally
Shifted Instances [77.28192419848901]
We propose a simple, yet effective method named contrasting shifted instances (CSI)
In addition to contrasting a given sample with other instances as in conventional contrastive learning methods, our training scheme contrasts the sample with distributionally-shifted augmentations of itself.
Our experiments demonstrate the superiority of our method under various novelty detection scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T08:32:56Z) - Learning a Unified Sample Weighting Network for Object Detection [113.98404690619982]
Region sampling or weighting is significantly important to the success of modern region-based object detectors.
We argue that sample weighting should be data-dependent and task-dependent.
We propose a unified sample weighting network to predict a sample's task weights.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-11T16:19:16Z) - Frustratingly Simple Few-Shot Object Detection [98.42824677627581]
We find that fine-tuning only the last layer of existing detectors on rare classes is crucial to the few-shot object detection task.
Such a simple approach outperforms the meta-learning methods by roughly 220 points on current benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-16T00:29:14Z) - Unseen Face Presentation Attack Detection Using Class-Specific Sparse
One-Class Multiple Kernel Fusion Regression [15.000818334408802]
The paper addresses face presentation attack detection in the challenging conditions of an unseen attack scenario.
A pure one-class face presentation attack detection approach based on kernel regression is developed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-31T11:53:20Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.