Exploring Content and Social Connections of Fake News with Explainable Text and Graph Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10040v3
• Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:32:47 GMT
• Title: Exploring Content and Social Connections of Fake News with Explainable Text and Graph Learning
• Authors: Vítor N. Lourenço, Aline Paes, Tillman Weyde,
• Abstract summary: False information often exploits social media dynamics such as "likes" and user networks to amplify its reach.<n>This paper proposes an explainable framework that combines content, social media, and graph-based features to enhance fact-checking.
• Score: 3.3181276611945263
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: The global spread of misinformation and concerns about content trustworthiness have driven the development of automated fact-checking systems. Since false information often exploits social media dynamics such as "likes" and user networks to amplify its reach, effective solutions must go beyond content analysis to incorporate these factors. Moreover, simply labelling content as false can be ineffective or even reinforce biases such as automation and confirmation bias. This paper proposes an explainable framework that combines content, social media, and graph-based features to enhance fact-checking. It integrates a misinformation classifier with explainability techniques to deliver complete and interpretable insights supporting classification decisions. Experiments demonstrate that multimodal information improves performance over single modalities, with evaluations conducted on datasets in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Additionally, the framework's explanations were assessed for interpretability, trustworthiness, and robustness with a novel protocol, showing that it effectively generates human-understandable justifications for its predictions.

Related papers

• COMMUNITYNOTES: A Dataset for Exploring the Helpfulness of Fact-Checking Explanations [89.37527535663433]
  We present a large-scale dataset of 104k posts with user-provided notes and helpfulness labels.<n>We propose a framework that automatically generates and improves reason definitions via automatic prompt optimization.<n>Our experiments show that the optimized definitions can improve both helpfulness and reason prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T05:28:47Z)
• Identification and explanation of disinformation in wiki data streams [4.390029685572874]
  This work aims to contribute to the automatic data quality validation field, addressing the rapid growth of online content on wiki pages.<n>Our scalable solution includes stream-based data processing with feature engineering, feature analysis and selection, stream-based classification, and real-time explanation of prediction outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T08:34:39Z)
• On the Fairness, Diversity and Reliability of Text-to-Image Generative Models [68.62012304574012]
  multimodal generative models have sparked critical discussions on their reliability, fairness and potential for misuse.<n>We propose an evaluation framework to assess model reliability by analyzing responses to global and local perturbations in the embedding space.<n>Our method lays the groundwork for detecting unreliable, bias-injected models and tracing the provenance of embedded biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-21T09:46:55Z)
• Improving Network Interpretability via Explanation Consistency Evaluation [56.14036428778861]
  We propose a framework that acquires more explainable activation heatmaps and simultaneously increase the model performance. Specifically, our framework introduces a new metric, i.e., explanation consistency, to reweight the training samples adaptively in model learning. Our framework then promotes the model learning by paying closer attention to those training samples with a high difference in explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T17:20:08Z)
• Identifying and Mitigating Social Bias Knowledge in Language Models [52.52955281662332]
  We propose a novel debiasing approach, Fairness Stamp (FAST), which enables fine-grained calibration of individual social biases.<n>FAST surpasses state-of-the-art baselines with superior debiasing performance.<n>This highlights the potential of fine-grained debiasing strategies to achieve fairness in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T17:14:58Z)
• ClaimVer: Explainable Claim-Level Verification and Evidence Attribution of Text Through Knowledge Graphs [13.608282497568108]
  ClaimVer is a human-centric framework tailored to meet users' informational and verification needs. It highlights each claim, verifies it against a trusted knowledge graph, and provides succinct, clear explanations for each claim prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T17:07:53Z)
• Capturing Pertinent Symbolic Features for Enhanced Content-Based Misinformation Detection [0.0]
  The detection of misleading content presents a significant hurdle due to its extreme linguistic and domain variability. This paper analyzes the linguistic attributes that characterize this phenomenon and how representative of such features some of the most popular misinformation datasets are. We demonstrate that the appropriate use of pertinent symbolic knowledge in combination with neural language models is helpful in detecting misleading content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T16:42:34Z)
• Factually Consistent Summarization via Reinforcement Learning with Textual Entailment Feedback [57.816210168909286]
  We leverage recent progress on textual entailment models to address this problem for abstractive summarization systems. We use reinforcement learning with reference-free, textual entailment rewards to optimize for factual consistency. Our results, according to both automatic metrics and human evaluation, show that our method considerably improves the faithfulness, salience, and conciseness of the generated summaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T21:04:04Z)
• A Modality-level Explainable Framework for Misinformation Checking in Social Networks [2.4028383570062606]
  This paper addresses automatic misinformation checking in social networks from a multimodal perspective. Our framework comprises a misinformation classifier assisted by explainable methods to generate modality-oriented explainable inferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-08T13:57:06Z)
• Interpretable Fake News Detection with Topic and Deep Variational Models [2.15242029196761]
  We focus on fake news detection using interpretable features and methods. We have developed a deep probabilistic model that integrates a dense representation of textual news. Our model achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art competing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T05:31:00Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Generating Fact Checking Explanations [52.879658637466605]
  A crucial piece of the puzzle that is still missing is to understand how to automate the most elaborate part of the process. This paper provides the first study of how these explanations can be generated automatically based on available claim context. Our results indicate that optimising both objectives at the same time, rather than training them separately, improves the performance of a fact checking system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-13T05:23:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.