Identification and explanation of disinformation in wiki data streams

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05605v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 08:34:39 GMT
• Title: Identification and explanation of disinformation in wiki data streams
• Authors: Francisco de Arriba-Pérez, Silvia García-Méndez, Fátima Leal, Benedita Malheiro, Juan C Burguillo,
• Abstract summary: This work aims to contribute to the automatic data quality validation field, addressing the rapid growth of online content on wiki pages.<n>Our scalable solution includes stream-based data processing with feature engineering, feature analysis and selection, stream-based classification, and real-time explanation of prediction outcomes.
• Score: 4.390029685572874
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Social media platforms, increasingly used as news sources for varied data analytics, have transformed how information is generated and disseminated. However, the unverified nature of this content raises concerns about trustworthiness and accuracy, potentially negatively impacting readers' critical judgment due to disinformation. This work aims to contribute to the automatic data quality validation field, addressing the rapid growth of online content on wiki pages. Our scalable solution includes stream-based data processing with feature engineering, feature analysis and selection, stream-based classification, and real-time explanation of prediction outcomes. The explainability dashboard is designed for the general public, who may need more specialized knowledge to interpret the model's prediction. Experimental results on two datasets attain approximately 90 % values across all evaluation metrics, demonstrating robust and competitive performance compared to works in the literature. In summary, the system assists editors by reducing their effort and time in detecting disinformation.

Related papers

• Yesterday's News: Benchmarking Multi-Dimensional Out-of-Distribution Generalisation of Misinformation Detection Models [15.120606566150816]
  Misinfo-general is a benchmark dataset for evaluating misinformation models' ability to perform out-of-distribution generalisation. We identify 6 axes of generalisation-time, event, topic, publisher, political bias, misinformation type-and design evaluation procedures for each.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T09:46:36Z)
• Identifying and Mitigating Social Bias Knowledge in Language Models [52.52955281662332]
  We propose a novel debiasing approach, Fairness Stamp (FAST), which enables fine-grained calibration of individual social biases.<n>FAST surpasses state-of-the-art baselines with superior debiasing performance.<n>This highlights the potential of fine-grained debiasing strategies to achieve fairness in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T17:14:58Z)
• Exposing and Explaining Fake News On-the-Fly [4.278181795494584]
  This work contributes with an explainable and online classification method to recognize fake news in real-time. The proposed method combines both unsupervised and supervised Machine Learning approaches with online created lexica. The performance of the proposed solution has been validated with real data sets from Twitter and the results attain 80 % accuracy and macro F-measure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T14:49:04Z)
• Prospector Heads: Generalized Feature Attribution for Large Models & Data [82.02696069543454]
  We introduce prospector heads, an efficient and interpretable alternative to explanation-based attribution methods. We demonstrate how prospector heads enable improved interpretation and discovery of class-specific patterns in input data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T23:01:28Z)
• Capturing Pertinent Symbolic Features for Enhanced Content-Based Misinformation Detection [0.0]
  The detection of misleading content presents a significant hurdle due to its extreme linguistic and domain variability. This paper analyzes the linguistic attributes that characterize this phenomenon and how representative of such features some of the most popular misinformation datasets are. We demonstrate that the appropriate use of pertinent symbolic knowledge in combination with neural language models is helpful in detecting misleading content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T16:42:34Z)
• Collect, Measure, Repeat: Reliability Factors for Responsible AI Data Collection [8.12993269922936]
  We argue that data collection for AI should be performed in a responsible manner. We propose a Responsible AI (RAI) methodology designed to guide the data collection with a set of metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T18:01:27Z)
• Harnessing the Power of Text-image Contrastive Models for Automatic Detection of Online Misinformation [50.46219766161111]
  We develop a self-learning model to explore the constrastive learning in the domain of misinformation identification. Our model shows the superior performance of non-matched image-text pair detection when the training data is insufficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T02:53:59Z)
• Interpretable Fake News Detection with Topic and Deep Variational Models [2.15242029196761]
  We focus on fake news detection using interpretable features and methods. We have developed a deep probabilistic model that integrates a dense representation of textual news. Our model achieves comparable performance to state-of-the-art competing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-04T05:31:00Z)
• Exploring the Trade-off between Plausibility, Change Intensity and Adversarial Power in Counterfactual Explanations using Multi-objective Optimization [73.89239820192894]
  We argue that automated counterfactual generation should regard several aspects of the produced adversarial instances. We present a novel framework for the generation of counterfactual examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T15:02:53Z)
• Information-Theoretic Odometry Learning [83.36195426897768]
  We propose a unified information theoretic framework for learning-motivated methods aimed at odometry estimation. The proposed framework provides an elegant tool for performance evaluation and understanding in information-theoretic language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-11T02:37:35Z)
• Hidden Biases in Unreliable News Detection Datasets [60.71991809782698]
  We show that selection bias during data collection leads to undesired artifacts in the datasets. We observed a significant drop (>10%) in accuracy for all models tested in a clean split with no train/test source overlap. We suggest future dataset creation include a simple model as a difficulty/bias probe and future model development use a clean non-overlapping site and date split.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-20T17:16:41Z)
• Generating Fact Checking Explanations [52.879658637466605]
  A crucial piece of the puzzle that is still missing is to understand how to automate the most elaborate part of the process. This paper provides the first study of how these explanations can be generated automatically based on available claim context. Our results indicate that optimising both objectives at the same time, rather than training them separately, improves the performance of a fact checking system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-13T05:23:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.