How Causal Abstraction Underpins Computational Explanation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11214v1
• Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 04:46:02 GMT
• Title: How Causal Abstraction Underpins Computational Explanation
• Authors: Atticus Geiger, Jacqueline Harding, Thomas Icard,
• Abstract summary: We argue that the theory of causal abstraction provides a fruitful lens on this topic.<n> Drawing on current discussions in deep learning with artificial neural networks, we illustrate how classical themes in the philosophy of computation and cognition resurface in contemporary machine learning.
• Score: 10.69993584381151
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Explanations of cognitive behavior often appeal to computations over representations. What does it take for a system to implement a given computation over suitable representational vehicles within that system? We argue that the language of causality -- and specifically the theory of causal abstraction -- provides a fruitful lens on this topic. Drawing on current discussions in deep learning with artificial neural networks, we illustrate how classical themes in the philosophy of computation and cognition resurface in contemporary machine learning. We offer an account of computational implementation grounded in causal abstraction, and examine the role for representation in the resulting picture. We argue that these issues are most profitably explored in connection with generalization and prediction.

Related papers

• The Dual Role of Abstracting over the Irrelevant in Symbolic Explanations: Cognitive Effort vs. Understanding [5.17306267654726]
  Explanations are central to human cognition, yet AI systems often produce outputs that are difficult to understand.<n>We investigate how formal abstractions, specifically removal and clustering, impact human reasoning performance and cognitive effort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T12:42:41Z)
• Abductive Computational Systems: Creative Abduction and Future Directions [4.315465190486744]
  Abductive reasoning is often mentioned in scientific, design-related and artistic contexts.<n>This paper reviews how abductive reasoning is discussed in theoretical science and design, and then analyses how various computational systems use abductive reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T02:21:41Z)
• Neural Causal Abstractions [63.21695740637627]
  We develop a new family of causal abstractions by clustering variables and their domains. We show that such abstractions are learnable in practical settings through Neural Causal Models. Our experiments support the theory and illustrate how to scale causal inferences to high-dimensional settings involving image data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T02:00:27Z)
• LOGICSEG: Parsing Visual Semantics with Neural Logic Learning and Reasoning [73.98142349171552]
  LOGICSEG is a holistic visual semantic that integrates neural inductive learning and logic reasoning with both rich data and symbolic knowledge. During fuzzy logic-based continuous relaxation, logical formulae are grounded onto data and neural computational graphs, hence enabling logic-induced network training. These designs together make LOGICSEG a general and compact neural-logic machine that is readily integrated into existing segmentation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-24T05:43:19Z)
• A Cognitively-Inspired Neural Architecture for Visual Abstract Reasoning Using Contrastive Perceptual and Conceptual Processing [14.201935774784632]
  We introduce a new neural architecture for solving visual abstract reasoning tasks inspired by human cognition. Inspired by this principle, our architecture models visual abstract reasoning as an iterative, self-contrasting learning process. Experiments on the machine learning dataset RAVEN show that CPCNet achieves higher accuracy than all previously published models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-19T11:18:01Z)
• Generative Models as a Complex Systems Science: How can we make sense of large language model behavior? [75.79305790453654]
  Coaxing out desired behavior from pretrained models, while avoiding undesirable ones, has redefined NLP. We argue for a systematic effort to decompose language model behavior into categories that explain cross-task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T22:58:41Z)
• Learning Differentiable Logic Programs for Abstract Visual Reasoning [22.167393386879294]
  Differentiable forward reasoning has been developed to integrate reasoning with gradient-based machine learning paradigms.<n>NEUMANN is a graph-based differentiable forward reasoner, passing messages in a memory-efficient manner and handling structured programs with functors.<n>We demonstrate that NEUMANN solves visual reasoning tasks efficiently, outperforming neural, symbolic, and neuro-symbolic baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-03T11:02:40Z)
• What does it mean to represent? Mental representations as falsifiable memory patterns [8.430851504111585]
  We argue that causal and teleological approaches fail to provide a satisfactory account of representation. We sketch an alternative according to which representations correspond to inferred latent structures in the world. These structures are assumed to have certain properties objectively, which allows for planning, prediction, and detection of unexpected events.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-06T12:52:42Z)
• Learning Algebraic Representation for Systematic Generalization in Abstract Reasoning [109.21780441933164]
  We propose a hybrid approach to improve systematic generalization in reasoning. We showcase a prototype with algebraic representation for the abstract spatial-temporal task of Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) We show that the algebraic representation learned can be decoded by isomorphism to generate an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-25T09:56:30Z)
• Abstract Spatial-Temporal Reasoning via Probabilistic Abduction and Execution [97.50813120600026]
  Spatial-temporal reasoning is a challenging task in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Recent works have focused on an abstract reasoning task of this kind -- Raven's Progressive Matrices ( RPM) We propose a neuro-symbolic Probabilistic Abduction and Execution learner (PrAE) learner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:18Z)
• This is not the Texture you are looking for! Introducing Novel Counterfactual Explanations for Non-Experts using Generative Adversarial Learning [59.17685450892182]
  counterfactual explanation systems try to enable a counterfactual reasoning by modifying the input image. We present a novel approach to generate such counterfactual image explanations based on adversarial image-to-image translation techniques. Our results show that our approach leads to significantly better results regarding mental models, explanation satisfaction, trust, emotions, and self-efficacy than two state-of-the art systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-22T10:08:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.