WIP: Leveraging LLMs for Enforcing Design Principles in Student Code: Analysis of Prompting Strategies and RAG

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11717v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 19:56:03 GMT
• Title: WIP: Leveraging LLMs for Enforcing Design Principles in Student Code: Analysis of Prompting Strategies and RAG
• Authors: Dhruv Kolhatkar, Soubhagya Akkena, Edward F. Gehringer,
• Abstract summary: This paper explores the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the code-review process for open-source software projects developed in computer science and software engineering courses.<n>The focus is on developing an automated feedback tool that evaluates student code for adherence to key object-oriented design principles.
• Score: 0.7407754140732635
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This work-in-progress research-to-practice paper explores the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the code-review process for open-source software projects developed in computer science and software engineering courses. The focus is on developing an automated feedback tool that evaluates student code for adherence to key object-oriented design principles, addressing the need for more effective and scalable methods to teach software design best practices. The innovative practice involves leveraging LLMs and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to create an automated feedback system that assesses student code for principles like SOLID, DRY, and design patterns. It analyzes the effectiveness of various prompting strategies and the RAG integration. Preliminary findings show promising improvements in code quality. Future work will aim to improve model accuracy and expand support for additional design principles.

Related papers

• From Code Foundation Models to Agents and Applications: A Practical Guide to Code Intelligence [150.3696990310269]
  Large language models (LLMs) have transformed automated software development by enabling direct translation of natural language descriptions into functional code.<n>We provide a comprehensive synthesis and practical guide (a series of analytic and probing experiments) about code LLMs.<n>We analyze the code capability of the general LLMs (GPT-4, Claude, LLaMA) and code-specialized LLMs (StarCoder, Code LLaMA, DeepSeek-Coder, and QwenCoder)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T17:09:34Z)
• Teaching Code Refactoring Using LLMs [0.7407754140732635]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can enhance the teaching of code in software engineering courses through real-time, context-aware feedback.<n>Refactoring improves code quality but is difficult to teach, especially with complex, real-worlds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T20:41:19Z)
• A Survey on Code Generation with LLM-based Agents [61.474191493322415]
  Code generation agents powered by large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing the software development paradigm.<n>LLMs are characterized by three core features.<n>This paper presents a systematic survey of the field of LLM-based code generation agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T18:17:36Z)
• MERA Code: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Code Generation Across Tasks [56.34018316319873]
  We propose MERA Code, a benchmark for evaluating code for the latest code generation LLMs in Russian.<n>This benchmark includes 11 evaluation tasks that span 8 programming languages.<n>We evaluate open LLMs and frontier API models, analyzing their limitations in terms of practical coding tasks in non-English languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-16T14:31:33Z)
• Towards Effective Code-Integrated Reasoning [89.47213509714578]
  We investigate code-integrated reasoning, where models generate code when necessary and integrate feedback by executing it through a code interpreter.<n>Tool-augmented reinforcement learning can still suffer from potential instability in the learning dynamics.<n>We develop enhanced training strategies that balance exploration and stability, progressively building tool-use capabilities while improving reasoning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T11:30:18Z)
• Enhancing LLM Code Generation: A Systematic Evaluation of Multi-Agent Collaboration and Runtime Debugging for Improved Accuracy, Reliability, and Latency [0.0]
  We study how different programming activities compositions and training paradigms influence code generation effectiveness.<n>Our findings provide valuable insights for organizations seeking robust AI-driven coding solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-04T14:44:27Z)
• ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needs [54.16305891389931]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often undergo supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to acquire tool use capabilities.<n>Recent advancements in reinforcement learning (RL) have demonstrated promising reasoning and generalization abilities.<n>We present the first comprehensive study on reward design for tool selection and application tasks within the RL paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T21:45:32Z)
• EduPlanner: LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Customized and Intelligent Instructional Design [31.595008625025134]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly advanced smart education in the Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) era.<n>EduPlanner is an LLM-based multiagent system comprising an evaluator agent, an agent, and a question analyst.<n>EduPlanner generates customized and intelligent instructional design for curriculum and learning activities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T17:49:12Z)
• SENAI: Towards Software Engineering Native Generative Artificial Intelligence [3.915435754274075]
  This paper argues for the integration of Software Engineering knowledge into Large Language Models.<n>The aim is to propose a new direction where LLMs can move beyond mere functional accuracy to perform generative tasks.<n>Software engineering native generative models will not only overcome the shortcomings present in current models but also pave the way for the next generation of generative models capable of handling real-world software engineering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T15:02:07Z)
• Code to Think, Think to Code: A Survey on Code-Enhanced Reasoning and Reasoning-Driven Code Intelligence in LLMs [53.00384299879513]
  In large language models (LLMs), code and reasoning reinforce each other.<n>Code provides verifiable execution paths, enforces logical decomposition, and enables runtime validation.<n>We identify key challenges and propose future research directions to strengthen this synergy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T18:55:42Z)
• AI-powered Code Review with LLMs: Early Results [10.37036924997437]
  We present a novel approach to improving software quality and efficiency through a Large Language Model (LLM)-based model. Our proposed LLM-based AI agent model is trained on large code repositories. It aims to detect code smells, identify potential bugs, provide suggestions for improvement, and optimize the code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T08:27:50Z)
• Machine Learning Insides OptVerse AI Solver: Design Principles and Applications [74.67495900436728]
  We present a comprehensive study on the integration of machine learning (ML) techniques into Huawei Cloud's OptVerse AI solver. We showcase our methods for generating complex SAT and MILP instances utilizing generative models that mirror multifaceted structures of real-world problem. We detail the incorporation of state-of-the-art parameter tuning algorithms which markedly elevate solver performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T15:02:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.