SENAI: Towards Software Engineering Native Generative Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15282v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 15:02:07 GMT
• Title: SENAI: Towards Software Engineering Native Generative Artificial Intelligence
• Authors: Mootez Saad, José Antonio Hernández López, Boqi Chen, Neil Ernst, Dániel Varró, Tushar Sharma,
• Abstract summary: This paper argues for the integration of Software Engineering knowledge into Large Language Models.<n>The aim is to propose a new direction where LLMs can move beyond mere functional accuracy to perform generative tasks.<n>Software engineering native generative models will not only overcome the shortcomings present in current models but also pave the way for the next generation of generative models capable of handling real-world software engineering.
• Score: 3.915435754274075
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models have significantly advanced the field of code generation, demonstrating the ability to produce functionally correct code snippets. However, advancements in generative AI for code overlook foundational Software Engineering (SE) principles such as modularity, and single responsibility, and concepts such as cohesion and coupling which are critical for creating maintainable, scalable, and robust software systems. These concepts are missing in pipelines that start with pre-training and end with the evaluation using benchmarks. This vision paper argues for the integration of SE knowledge into LLMs to enhance their capability to understand, analyze, and generate code and other SE artifacts following established SE knowledge. The aim is to propose a new direction where LLMs can move beyond mere functional accuracy to perform generative tasks that require adherence to SE principles and best practices. In addition, given the interactive nature of these conversational models, we propose using Bloom's Taxonomy as a framework to assess the extent to which they internalize SE knowledge. The proposed evaluation framework offers a sound and more comprehensive evaluation technique compared to existing approaches such as linear probing. Software engineering native generative models will not only overcome the shortcomings present in current models but also pave the way for the next generation of generative models capable of handling real-world software engineering.

Related papers

• Generalising from Self-Produced Data: Model Training Beyond Human Constraints [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel framework in which AI models autonomously generate and validate new knowledge. Central to this approach is an unbounded, ungamable numeric reward that guides learning without requiring human benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:48:02Z)
• CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generation [24.090719826360342]
  We introduce CodeIF, the first benchmark designed to assess the abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to adhere to task-oriented instructions within code generation scenarios.<n>We conduct extensive experiments with LLMs, analyzing their strengths and limitations in meeting the demands of these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T14:19:49Z)
• Bridging LLM-Generated Code and Requirements: Reverse Generation technique and SBC Metric for Developer Insights [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel scoring mechanism called the SBC score.<n>It is based on a reverse generation technique that leverages the natural language generation capabilities of Large Language Models.<n>Unlike direct code analysis, our approach reconstructs system requirements from AI-generated code and compares them with the original specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T01:12:11Z)
• Toward Neurosymbolic Program Comprehension [46.874490406174644]
  We advocate for a Neurosymbolic research direction that combines the strengths of existing DL techniques with traditional symbolic methods.<n>We present preliminary results for our envisioned approach, aimed at establishing the first Neurosymbolic Program framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T20:38:58Z)
• Self-Improvement in Language Models: The Sharpening Mechanism [70.9248553790022]
  We offer a new perspective on the capabilities of self-improvement through a lens we refer to as sharpening.<n>Motivated by the observation that language models are often better at verifying response quality than they are at generating correct responses, we formalize self-improvement as using the model itself as a verifier during post-training.<n>We analyze two natural families of self-improvement algorithms based on SFT and RLHF.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T20:24:17Z)
• Benchmarks as Microscopes: A Call for Model Metrology [76.64402390208576]
  Modern language models (LMs) pose a new challenge in capability assessment. To be confident in our metrics, we need a new discipline of model metrology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T17:52:12Z)
• Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering in Large Language Models: a comprehensive review [1.6006550105523192]
  Review explores the pivotal role of prompt engineering in unleashing the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) Examines both foundational and advanced methodologies of prompt engineering, including techniques such as self-consistency, chain-of-thought, and generated knowledge. Review also reflects the essential role of prompt engineering in advancing AI capabilities, providing a structured framework for future research and application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T09:15:18Z)
• CodeRL: Mastering Code Generation through Pretrained Models and Deep Reinforcement Learning [92.36705236706678]
  "CodeRL" is a new framework for program synthesis tasks through pretrained LMs and deep reinforcement learning. During inference, we introduce a new generation procedure with a critical sampling strategy. For the model backbones, we extended the encoder-decoder architecture of CodeT5 with enhanced learning objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T02:42:15Z)
• Technology Readiness Levels for Machine Learning Systems [107.56979560568232]
  Development and deployment of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. We have developed a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment. Our "Machine Learning Technology Readiness Levels" framework defines a principled process to ensure robust, reliable, and responsible systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-11T15:54:48Z)
• Technology Readiness Levels for AI & ML [79.22051549519989]
  Development of machine learning systems can be executed easily with modern tools, but the process is typically rushed and means-to-an-end. Engineering systems follow well-defined processes and testing standards to streamline development for high-quality, reliable results. We propose a proven systems engineering approach for machine learning development and deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-21T17:14:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.