FutureX: An Advanced Live Benchmark for LLM Agents in Future Prediction
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11987v3
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 09:15:55 GMT
- Title: FutureX: An Advanced Live Benchmark for LLM Agents in Future Prediction
- Authors: Zhiyuan Zeng, Jiashuo Liu, Siyuan Chen, Tianci He, Yali Liao, Yixiao Tian, Jinpeng Wang, Zaiyuan Wang, Yang Yang, Lingyue Yin, Mingren Yin, Zhenwei Zhu, Tianle Cai, Zehui Chen, Jiecao Chen, Yantao Du, Xiang Gao, Jiacheng Guo, Liang Hu, Jianpeng Jiao, Xiangsheng Li, Jingkai Liu, Shuang Ni, Zhoufutu Wen, Ge Zhang, Kaiyuan Zhang, Xin Zhou, Jose Blanchet, Xipeng Qiu, Mengdi Wang, Wenhao Huang,
- Abstract summary: FutureX is the largest and most diverse live benchmark for future prediction.<n>It supports real-time daily updates and eliminates data contamination through an automated pipeline for question gathering and answer collection.<n>We evaluate 25 LLM/agent models, including those with reasoning, search capabilities, and integration of external tools.
- Score: 92.7392863957204
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Future prediction is a complex task for LLM agents, requiring a high level of analytical thinking, information gathering, contextual understanding, and decision-making under uncertainty. Agents must not only gather and interpret vast amounts of dynamic information but also integrate diverse data sources, weigh uncertainties, and adapt predictions based on emerging trends, just as human experts do in fields like politics, economics, and finance. Despite its importance, no large-scale benchmark exists for evaluating agents on future prediction, largely due to challenges in handling real-time updates and retrieving timely, accurate answers. To address this, we introduce $\textbf{FutureX}$, a dynamic and live evaluation benchmark specifically designed for LLM agents performing future prediction tasks. FutureX is the largest and most diverse live benchmark for future prediction, supporting real-time daily updates and eliminating data contamination through an automated pipeline for question gathering and answer collection. We evaluate 25 LLM/agent models, including those with reasoning, search capabilities, and integration of external tools such as the open-source Deep Research Agent and closed-source Deep Research models. This comprehensive evaluation assesses agents' adaptive reasoning and performance in dynamic environments. Additionally, we provide in-depth analyses of agents' failure modes and performance pitfalls in future-oriented tasks, including the vulnerability to fake web pages and the temporal validity. Our goal is to establish a dynamic, contamination-free evaluation standard that drives the development of LLM agents capable of performing at the level of professional human analysts in complex reasoning and predictive thinking.
Related papers
- Current Agents Fail to Leverage World Model as Tool for Foresight [61.82522354207919]
Generative world models offer a promising remedy: agents could use them to foresee outcomes before acting.<n>This paper empirically examines whether current agents can leverage such world models as tools to enhance their cognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-07T13:15:23Z) - CryptoBench: A Dynamic Benchmark for Expert-Level Evaluation of LLM Agents in Cryptocurrency [60.83660377169452]
This paper introduces CryptoBench, the first expert-curated, dynamic benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the real-world capabilities of Large Language Model (LLM) agents.<n>Unlike general-purpose agent benchmarks for search and prediction, professional crypto analysis presents specific challenges.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-29T09:52:34Z) - How AI Forecasts AI Jobs: Benchmarking LLM Predictions of Labor Market Changes [5.848712585343904]
This paper introduces a benchmark for evaluating how well large language models (LLMs) can anticipate changes in job demand.<n>Our benchmark combines two datasets: a high-frequency index of sector-level job postings in the United States, and a global dataset of projected occupational changes due to AI adoption.<n>Results show that structured task prompts consistently improve forecast stability, while persona prompts offer advantages on short-term trends.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-27T14:08:27Z) - Deriving Strategic Market Insights with Large Language Models: A Benchmark for Forward Counterfactual Generation [55.2788567621326]
We introduce a novel benchmark, FIN-FORCE-FINancial FORward Counterfactual Evaluation.<n>By curating financial news headlines, FIN-FORCE supports LLM based forward counterfactual generation.<n>This paves the way for scalable and automated solutions for exploring and anticipating future market developments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T02:41:50Z) - InfoDeepSeek: Benchmarking Agentic Information Seeking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [63.55258191625131]
InfoDeepSeek is a new benchmark for assessing agentic information seeking in real-world, dynamic web environments.<n>We propose a systematic methodology for constructing challenging queries satisfying the criteria of determinacy, difficulty, and diversity.<n>We develop the first evaluation framework tailored to dynamic agentic information seeking, including fine-grained metrics about the accuracy, utility, and compactness of information seeking outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-21T14:44:40Z) - Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents [28.91672694491855]
The emergence of LLM-based agents represents a paradigm shift in AI.<n>This paper provides the first comprehensive survey of evaluation methodologies for these increasingly capable agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-20T17:59:23Z) - FinRobot: AI Agent for Equity Research and Valuation with Large Language Models [6.2474959166074955]
This paper presents FinRobot, the first AI agent framework specifically designed for equity research.
FinRobot employs a multi-agent Chain of Thought (CoT) system, integrating both quantitative and qualitative analyses to emulate the comprehensive reasoning of a human analyst.
Unlike existing automated research tools, such as CapitalCube and Wright Reports, FinRobot delivers insights comparable to those produced by major brokerage firms and fundamental research vendors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-13T17:38:07Z) - MIRAI: Evaluating LLM Agents for Event Forecasting [22.524158637977]
We introduce MIRAI, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate LLM agents as temporal forecasters in the context of international events.
Our benchmark features an agentic environment with tools for accessing an extensive database of historical, structured events and textual news articles.
In summary, MIRAI comprehensively evaluates the agents' capabilities in three dimensions: 1) autonomously source and integrate critical information from large global databases; 2) write codes using domain-specific APIs and libraries for tool-use; and 3) jointly reason over historical knowledge from diverse formats and time to accurately predict future events.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T12:22:46Z) - F-FOMAML: GNN-Enhanced Meta-Learning for Peak Period Demand Forecasting with Proxy Data [65.6499834212641]
We formulate the demand prediction as a meta-learning problem and develop the Feature-based First-Order Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (F-FOMAML) algorithm.
By considering domain similarities through task-specific metadata, our model improved generalization, where the excess risk decreases as the number of training tasks increases.
Compared to existing state-of-the-art models, our method demonstrates a notable improvement in demand prediction accuracy, reducing the Mean Absolute Error by 26.24% on an internal vending machine dataset and by 1.04% on the publicly accessible JD.com dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-23T21:28:50Z) - Approaching Human-Level Forecasting with Language Models [34.202996056121]
We study whether language models (LMs) can forecast at the level of competitive human forecasters.
We develop a retrieval-augmented LM system designed to automatically search for relevant information, generate forecasts, and aggregate predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T18:54:18Z) - Can ChatGPT Forecast Stock Price Movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Models [51.3422222472898]
We document the capability of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT to predict stock price movements using news headlines.
We develop a theoretical model incorporating information capacity constraints, underreaction, limits-to-arbitrage, and LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-15T19:22:37Z) - What Should I Know? Using Meta-gradient Descent for Predictive Feature
Discovery in a Single Stream of Experience [63.75363908696257]
computational reinforcement learning seeks to construct an agent's perception of the world through predictions of future sensations.
An open challenge in this line of work is determining from the infinitely many predictions that the agent could possibly make which predictions might best support decision-making.
We introduce a meta-gradient descent process by which an agent learns what predictions to make, 2) the estimates for its chosen predictions, and 3) how to use those estimates to generate policies that maximize future reward.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-13T21:31:06Z) - Deep Reinforcement and InfoMax Learning [32.426674181365456]
We introduce an objective based on Deep InfoMax which trains the agent to predict the future by maximizing the mutual information between its internal representation of successive timesteps.
We test our approach in several synthetic settings, where it successfully learns representations that are predictive of the future.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-12T14:19:46Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.