Explainability of Algorithms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13529v1
• Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 05:42:19 GMT
• Title: Explainability of Algorithms
• Authors: Andrés Páez,
• Abstract summary: The opaqueness of many complex machine learning algorithms is often mentioned as one of the main obstacles to the ethical development of artificial intelligence (AI)<n>This chapter examines two ways of understanding opacity and the ethical implications that stem from each of them.<n>As the analysis shows, explainable AI (XAI) still faces numerous challenges.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The opaqueness of many complex machine learning algorithms is often mentioned as one of the main obstacles to the ethical development of artificial intelligence (AI). But what does it mean for an algorithm to be opaque? Highly complex algorithms such as artificial neural networks process enormous volumes of data in parallel along multiple hidden layers of interconnected nodes, rendering their inner workings epistemically inaccessible to any human being, including their designers and developers; they are "black boxes" for all their stakeholders. But opaqueness is not always the inevitable result of technical complexity. Sometimes, the way an algorithm works is intentionally hidden from view for proprietary reasons, especially in commercial automated decision systems, creating an entirely different type of opaqueness. In the first part of the chapter, we will examine these two ways of understanding opacity and the ethical implications that stem from each of them. In the second part, we explore the different explanatory methods that have been developed in computer science to overcome an AI system's technical opaqueness. As the analysis shows, explainable AI (XAI) still faces numerous challenges.

Related papers

• Beyond Explainable AI (XAI): An Overdue Paradigm Shift and Post-XAI Research Directions [95.59915390053588]
  This study focuses on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approaches-focusing on deep neural networks (DNNs) and large language models (LLMs)<n>We discuss critical symptoms that stem from deeper root causes (i.e., two paradoxes, two conceptual confusions, and five false assumptions)<n>To move beyond XAI's limitations, we propose a four-pronged paradigm shift toward reliable and certified AI development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T16:58:27Z)
• Solving the enigma: Enhancing faithfulness and comprehensibility in explanations of deep networks [3.9584068556746246]
  We introduce a novel framework designed to enhance the explainability of deep networks through a dual focus on maximizing both accuracy and comprehensibility in explanations.<n>Our framework integrates outputs from multiple established XAI methods and leverages a non-linear neural network model, termed the 'explanation,' to construct a unified, optimal explanation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T11:49:08Z)
• Artificial intelligence is algorithmic mimicry: why artificial "agents" are not (and won't be) proper agents [0.0]
  I investigate what is the prospect of developing artificial general intelligence (AGI) I compare living and algorithmic systems, with a special focus on the notion of "agency" It is extremely unlikely that true AGI can be developed in the current algorithmic framework of AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-27T19:25:09Z)
• Human-Centric Multimodal Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Testbed on AI-based Recruitment [66.91538273487379]
  There is a certain consensus about the need to develop AI applications with a Human-Centric approach. Human-Centric Machine Learning needs to be developed based on four main requirements: (i) utility and social good; (ii) privacy and data ownership; (iii) transparency and accountability; and (iv) fairness in AI-driven decision-making processes. We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-13T16:44:44Z)
• Seamful XAI: Operationalizing Seamful Design in Explainable AI [59.89011292395202]
  Mistakes in AI systems are inevitable, arising from both technical limitations and sociotechnical gaps. We propose that seamful design can foster AI explainability by revealing sociotechnical and infrastructural mismatches. We explore this process with 43 AI practitioners and real end-users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-12T21:54:05Z)
• On Explainability in AI-Solutions: A Cross-Domain Survey [4.394025678691688]
  In automatically deriving a system model, AI algorithms learn relations in data that are not detectable for humans. The more complex a model, the more difficult it is for a human to understand the reasoning for the decisions. This work provides an extensive survey of literature on this topic, which, to a large part, consists of other surveys.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T06:21:47Z)
• Divide & Conquer Imitation Learning [75.31752559017978]
  Imitation Learning can be a powerful approach to bootstrap the learning process. We present a novel algorithm designed to imitate complex robotic tasks from the states of an expert trajectory. We show that our method imitates a non-holonomic navigation task and scales to a complex simulated robotic manipulation task with very high sample efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-15T09:56:50Z)
• A User-Centred Framework for Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-Robot Interaction [70.11080854486953]
  We propose a user-centred framework for XAI that focuses on its social-interactive aspect. The framework aims to provide a structure for interactive XAI solutions thought for non-expert users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T09:56:23Z)
• Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): An Engineering Perspective [0.0]
  XAI is a set of techniques and methods to convert the so-called black-box AI algorithms to white-box algorithms. We discuss the stakeholders in XAI and describe the mathematical contours of XAI from engineering perspective. This work is an exploratory study to identify new avenues of research in the field of XAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-10T19:49:12Z)
• Bias in Multimodal AI: Testbed for Fair Automatic Recruitment [73.85525896663371]
  We study how current multimodal algorithms based on heterogeneous sources of information are affected by sensitive elements and inner biases in the data. We train automatic recruitment algorithms using a set of multimodal synthetic profiles consciously scored with gender and racial biases. Our methodology and results show how to generate fairer AI-based tools in general, and in particular fairer automated recruitment systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-15T15:58:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.