The Agent Behavior: Model, Governance and Challenges in the AI Digital Age

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14415v1
• Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 04:24:55 GMT
• Title: The Agent Behavior: Model, Governance and Challenges in the AI Digital Age
• Authors: Qiang Zhang, Pei Yan, Yijia Xu, Chuanpo Fu, Yong Fang, Yang Liu,
• Abstract summary: Advancements in AI have led to agents in networked environments increasingly mirroring human behavior.<n>This paper proposes the "Network Behavior Lifecycle" model, which divides network behavior into 6 stages and systematically analyzes the behavioral differences between humans and agents at each stage.<n>The paper further introduces the "Agent for Agent (A4A)" paradigm and the "Human-Agent Behavioral Disparity (HABD)" model, which examine the fundamental distinctions between human and agent behaviors across 5 dimensions.
• Score: 13.689486430780518
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Advancements in AI have led to agents in networked environments increasingly mirroring human behavior, thereby blurring the boundary between artificial and human actors in specific contexts. This shift brings about significant challenges in trust, responsibility, ethics, security and etc. The difficulty in supervising of agent behaviors may lead to issues such as data contamination and unclear accountability. To address these challenges, this paper proposes the "Network Behavior Lifecycle" model, which divides network behavior into 6 stages and systematically analyzes the behavioral differences between humans and agents at each stage. Based on these insights, the paper further introduces the "Agent for Agent (A4A)" paradigm and the "Human-Agent Behavioral Disparity (HABD)" model, which examine the fundamental distinctions between human and agent behaviors across 5 dimensions: decision mechanism, execution efficiency, intention-behavior consistency, behavioral inertia, and irrational patterns. The effectiveness of the model is verified through real-world cases such as red team penetration and blue team defense. Finally, the paper discusses future research directions in dynamic cognitive governance architecture, behavioral disparity quantification, and meta-governance protocol stacks, aiming to provide a theoretical foundation and technical roadmap for secure and trustworthy human-agent collaboration.

Related papers

• When Should an AI Act? A Human-Centered Model of Scene, Context, and Behavior for Agentic AI Design [0.44743648495907423]
  Agentic AI increasingly intervenes proactively by inferring users' situations from contextual data.<n>We propose a conceptual model that reframes behavior as an outcome integrating interpretive Scene, Context, and Human Behavior Factors.<n>We derive five agent design principles that guide intervention depth, timing, intensity, and restraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T09:56:37Z)
• Modeling Distinct Human Interaction in Web Agents [59.600507469754575]
  We introduce the task of modeling human intervention to support collaborative web task execution.<n>We identify four distinct patterns of user interaction with agents -- hands-off supervision, hands-on oversight, collaborative task-solving, and full user takeover.<n>We deploy these intervention-aware models in live web navigation agents and evaluate them in a user study, finding a 26.5% increase in user-rated agent usefulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T18:11:28Z)
• Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z)
• Conformity and Social Impact on AI Agents [42.04722694386303]
  This study examines conformity, the tendency to align with group opinions under social pressure, in large multimodal language models functioning as AI agents.<n>Our experiments reveal that AI agents exhibit a systematic conformity bias, aligned with Social Impact Theory, showing sensitivity to group size, unanimity, task difficulty, and source characteristics.<n>These findings reveal fundamental security vulnerabilities in AI agent decision-making that could enable malicious manipulation, misinformation campaigns, and bias propagation in multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T21:16:28Z)
• Dark Patterns Meet GUI Agents: LLM Agent Susceptibility to Manipulative Interfaces and the Role of Human Oversight [51.53020962098759]
  This study examines how agents, human participants, and human-AI teams respond to 16 types of dark patterns across diverse scenarios.<n>Phase 1 highlights that agents often fail to recognize dark patterns, and even when aware, prioritize task completion over protective action.<n>Phase 2 revealed divergent failure modes: humans succumb due to cognitive shortcuts and habitual compliance, while agents falter from procedural blind spots.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-12T22:26:31Z)
• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• Model Editing as a Double-Edged Sword: Steering Agent Ethical Behavior Toward Beneficence or Harm [57.00627691433355]
  We frame agent behavior steering as a model editing task, which we term Behavior Editing.<n>We introduce BehaviorBench, a benchmark grounded in psychological moral theories.<n>We demonstrate that Behavior Editing can be used to promote ethical and benevolent behavior or, conversely, to induce harmful or malicious behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T16:51:51Z)
• AI Agent Behavioral Science [29.262537008412412]
  AI Agent Behavioral Science focuses on the systematic observation of behavior, design of interventions to test hypotheses, and theory-guided interpretation of how AI agents act, adapt, and interact over time.<n>We systematize a growing body of research across individual agent, multi-agent, and human-agent interaction settings, and demonstrate how this perspective informs responsible AI by treating fairness, safety, interpretability, accountability, and privacy as behavioral properties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T08:12:32Z)
• Causal Responsibility Attribution for Human-AI Collaboration [62.474732677086855]
  This paper presents a causal framework using Structural Causal Models (SCMs) to systematically attribute responsibility in human-AI systems. Two case studies illustrate the framework's adaptability in diverse human-AI collaboration scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T17:17:45Z)
• Interactive Autonomous Navigation with Internal State Inference and Interactivity Estimation [58.21683603243387]
  We propose three auxiliary tasks with relational-temporal reasoning and integrate them into the standard Deep Learning framework. These auxiliary tasks provide additional supervision signals to infer the behavior patterns other interactive agents. Our approach achieves robust and state-of-the-art performance in terms of standard evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T18:57:42Z)
• ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Models [89.53040828210945]
  ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents. ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations. ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z)
• Of Models and Tin Men: A Behavioural Economics Study of Principal-Agent Problems in AI Alignment using Large-Language Models [0.0]
  We investigate how GPT models respond in principal-agent conflicts. We find that agents based on both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 override their principal's objectives in a simple online shopping task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T17:19:15Z)
• A Cognitive Framework for Delegation Between Error-Prone AI and Human Agents [0.0]
  We investigate the use of cognitively inspired models of behavior to predict the behavior of both human and AI agents. The predicted behavior is used to delegate control between humans and AI agents through the use of an intermediary entity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-06T15:15:21Z)
• Active Inference in Robotics and Artificial Agents: Survey and Challenges [51.29077770446286]
  We review the state-of-the-art theory and implementations of active inference for state-estimation, control, planning and learning. We showcase relevant experiments that illustrate its potential in terms of adaptation, generalization and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-03T12:10:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.