The Prompting Brain: Neurocognitive Markers of Expertise in Guiding Large Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14869v1
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 17:31:53 GMT
- Title: The Prompting Brain: Neurocognitive Markers of Expertise in Guiding Large Language Models
- Authors: Hend Al-Khalifa, Raneem Almansour, Layan Abdulrahman Alhuasini, Alanood Alsaleh, Mohamad-Hani Temsah, Mohamad-Hani_Temsah, Ashwag Rafea S Alruwaili,
- Abstract summary: This paper presents findings from a cross-sectional pilot fMRI study investigating differences in brain functional connectivity and network activity between experts and intermediate prompt engineers.<n>Our results reveal distinct neural signatures associated with higher prompt engineering literacy, including increased functional connectivity in brain regions such as the left middle temporal gyrus and the left frontal pole.<n>We discuss the implications of these neurocognitive markers in Natural Language Processing (NLP)
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Prompt engineering has rapidly emerged as a critical skill for effective interaction with large language models (LLMs). However, the cognitive and neural underpinnings of this expertise remain largely unexplored. This paper presents findings from a cross-sectional pilot fMRI study investigating differences in brain functional connectivity and network activity between experts and intermediate prompt engineers. Our results reveal distinct neural signatures associated with higher prompt engineering literacy, including increased functional connectivity in brain regions such as the left middle temporal gyrus and the left frontal pole, as well as altered power-frequency dynamics in key cognitive networks. These findings offer initial insights into the neurobiological basis of prompt engineering proficiency. We discuss the implications of these neurocognitive markers in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Understanding the neural basis of human expertise in interacting with LLMs can inform the design of more intuitive human-AI interfaces, contribute to cognitive models of LLM interaction, and potentially guide the development of AI systems that better align with human cognitive workflows. This interdisciplinary approach aims to bridge the gap between human cognition and machine intelligence, fostering a deeper understanding of how humans learn and adapt to complex AI systems.
Related papers
- Lilith: Developmental Modular LLMs with Chemical Signaling [49.1574468325115]
Current paradigms in Artificial Intelligence rely on layers of feedforward networks which model brain activity at the neuronal level.<n>We propose LILITH, a novel architecture that combines developmental training of modular language models with brain-inspired token-based communication protocols.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-06T23:18:51Z) - The Memory Paradox: Why Our Brains Need Knowledge in an Age of AI [4.508868068781058]
Drawing on neuroscience and cognitive psychology, this paper examines how heavy reliance on AI systems may impair the consolidation of declarative and procedural memory.<n>We highlight striking parallels between deep learning phenomena such as "grokking" and the neuroscience of overlearning and intuition.<n>The paper concludes with policy implications for education and workforce training in the age of large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-03T03:41:33Z) - BrainMAP: Learning Multiple Activation Pathways in Brain Networks [77.15180533984947]
We introduce a novel framework BrainMAP to learn Multiple Activation Pathways in Brain networks.<n>Our framework enables explanatory analyses of crucial brain regions involved in tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T09:13:35Z) - Brain-like Functional Organization within Large Language Models [58.93629121400745]
The human brain has long inspired the pursuit of artificial intelligence (AI)
Recent neuroimaging studies provide compelling evidence of alignment between the computational representation of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and the neural responses of the human brain to stimuli.
In this study, we bridge this gap by directly coupling sub-groups of artificial neurons with functional brain networks (FBNs)
This framework links the AN sub-groups to FBNs, enabling the delineation of brain-like functional organization within large language models (LLMs)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-25T13:15:17Z) - Lost in Translation: The Algorithmic Gap Between LMs and the Brain [8.799971499357499]
Language Models (LMs) have achieved impressive performance on various linguistic tasks, but their relationship to human language processing in the brain remains unclear.
This paper examines the gaps and overlaps between LMs and the brain at different levels of analysis.
We discuss how insights from neuroscience, such as sparsity, modularity, internal states, and interactive learning, can inform the development of more biologically plausible language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-05T17:43:16Z) - Enhancing learning in spiking neural networks through neuronal heterogeneity and neuromodulatory signaling [52.06722364186432]
We propose a biologically-informed framework for enhancing artificial neural networks (ANNs)
Our proposed dual-framework approach highlights the potential of spiking neural networks (SNNs) for emulating diverse spiking behaviors.
We outline how the proposed approach integrates brain-inspired compartmental models and task-driven SNNs, bioinspiration and complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-05T14:11:28Z) - Brain-Inspired Machine Intelligence: A Survey of
Neurobiologically-Plausible Credit Assignment [65.268245109828]
We examine algorithms for conducting credit assignment in artificial neural networks that are inspired or motivated by neurobiology.
We organize the ever-growing set of brain-inspired learning schemes into six general families and consider these in the context of backpropagation of errors.
The results of this review are meant to encourage future developments in neuro-mimetic systems and their constituent learning processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-01T05:20:57Z) - Enabling High-Level Machine Reasoning with Cognitive Neuro-Symbolic
Systems [67.01132165581667]
We propose to enable high-level reasoning in AI systems by integrating cognitive architectures with external neuro-symbolic components.
We illustrate a hybrid framework centered on ACT-R and we discuss the role of generative models in recent and future applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-13T21:20:17Z) - A Neuro-mimetic Realization of the Common Model of Cognition via Hebbian
Learning and Free Energy Minimization [55.11642177631929]
Large neural generative models are capable of synthesizing semantically rich passages of text or producing complex images.
We discuss the COGnitive Neural GENerative system, such an architecture that casts the Common Model of Cognition.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-14T23:28:48Z) - NeuroCERIL: Robotic Imitation Learning via Hierarchical Cause-Effect
Reasoning in Programmable Attractor Neural Networks [2.0646127669654826]
We present NeuroCERIL, a brain-inspired neurocognitive architecture that uses a novel hypothetico-deductive reasoning procedure.
We show that NeuroCERIL can learn various procedural skills in a simulated robotic imitation learning domain.
We conclude that NeuroCERIL is a viable neural model of human-like imitation learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-11T19:56:11Z) - A brain basis of dynamical intelligence for AI and computational
neuroscience [0.0]
More brain-like capacities may demand new theories, models, and methods for designing artificial learning systems.
This article was inspired by our symposium on dynamical neuroscience and machine learning at the 6th Annual US/NIH BRAIN Initiative Investigators Meeting.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-15T19:49:32Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.