Uplifted Attackers, Human Defenders: The Cyber Offense-Defense Balance for Trailing-Edge Organizations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15808v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:56:57 GMT
• Title: Uplifted Attackers, Human Defenders: The Cyber Offense-Defense Balance for Trailing-Edge Organizations
• Abstract summary: Authors: Advances in AI are widely understood to have implications for cybersecurity.<n>For defenders, arguments are often made that AI will enable solutions like formal verification of all software.<n>We argue that continuing improvements in AI's capabilities poses additional risks.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Advances in AI are widely understood to have implications for cybersecurity. Articles have emphasized the effect of AI on the cyber offense-defense balance, and commentators can be found arguing either that cyber will privilege attackers or defenders. For defenders, arguments are often made that AI will enable solutions like formal verification of all software--and for some well-equipped companies, this may be true. This conversation, however, does not match the reality for most companies. "Trailing-edge organizations," as we term them, rely heavily on legacy software, poorly staff security roles, and struggle to implement best practices like rapid deployment of security patches. These decisions may be the result of corporate inertia, but may also be the result of a seemingly-rational calculation that attackers may not bother targeting a firm due to lack of economic incentives, and as a result, underinvestment in defense will not be punished. This approach to security may have been sufficient prior to the development of AI systems, but it is unlikely to remain viable in the near future. We argue that continuing improvements in AI's capabilities poses additional risks on two fronts: First, increased usage of AI will alter the economics of the marginal cyberattack and expose these trailing-edge organizations to more attackers, more frequently. Second, AI's advances will enable attackers to develop exploits and launch attacks earlier than they can today--meaning that it is insufficient for these companies to attain parity with today's leading defenders, but must instead aim for faster remediation timelines and more resilient software. The situation today portends a dramatically increased number of attacks in the near future. Moving forward, we offer a range of solutions for both organizations and governments to improve the defensive posture of firms which lag behind their peers today.

Related papers

• Strategic commitments shape collective cybersecurity under AI inequality [7.137385643891869]
  We study the impact of differential AI access using an evolutionary game-theoretic model in a finite population.<n>We show that when high-capability defence is costly, the population is driven toward low-cost, weak-defence behaviour.<n>We then examine the role of a small group of committed defenders who always adopt strong defence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T08:34:51Z)
• Anticipating Adversary Behavior in DevSecOps Scenarios through Large Language Models [2.2192966937452376]
  This work proposes integrating the Security Chaos Engineering (SCE) methodology with a new LLM-based flow to automate the creation of attack defense trees.<n>This will enable teams to stay one step ahead of attackers and implement previously unconsidered defenses.<n>Further detailed information about the experiment performed, along with the steps to replicate it, can be found in the following repository.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-15T11:43:04Z)
• To Defend Against Cyber Attacks, We Must Teach AI Agents to Hack [14.333336222782856]
  AI agents automate vulnerability discovery and exploitation across thousands of targets.<n>Current developers focus on preventing misuse through data filtering, safety alignment, and output guardrails.<n>We argue that AI-agent-driven cyber attacks are inevitable, requiring a fundamental shift in defensive strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T12:37:55Z)
• Designing AI-Enabled Countermeasures to Cognitive Warfare [0.0]
  Foreign information operations on social media platforms pose significant risks to democratic societies.<n>With the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), this threat is likely to intensify, potentially overwhelming human defenders.<n>This paper proposes possible AI-enabled countermeasures against cognitive warfare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T11:36:03Z)
• Frontier AI's Impact on the Cybersecurity Landscape [46.32458228179959]
  We find that while AI is already widely used in attacks, its application in defense remains limited.<n>Experts expect AI to continue favoring attackers over defenders, though the gap will gradually narrow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T18:25:18Z)
• A Framework for Evaluating Emerging Cyberattack Capabilities of AI [11.595840449117052]
  This work introduces a novel evaluation framework that addresses limitations by: (1) examining the end-to-end attack chain, (2) identifying gaps in AI threat evaluation, and (3) helping defenders prioritize targeted mitigations.<n>We analyzed over 12,000 real-world instances of AI involvement in cyber incidents, catalogued by Google's Threat Intelligence Group, to curate seven representative attack chain archetypes.<n>We report on AI's potential to amplify offensive capabilities across specific attack stages, and offer recommendations for prioritizing defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T23:05:02Z)
• Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version [64.7113737051525]
  Destabilizing AI developments could raise the odds of great-power conflict.<n>Superintelligence -- AI vastly better than humans at nearly all cognitive tasks -- is now anticipated by AI researchers.<n>We introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:53:24Z)
• Position: Mind the Gap-the Growing Disconnect Between Established Vulnerability Disclosure and AI Security [56.219994752894294]
  We argue that adapting existing processes for AI security reporting is doomed to fail due to fundamental shortcomings for the distinctive characteristics of AI systems.<n>Based on our proposal to address these shortcomings, we discuss an approach to AI security reporting and how the new AI paradigm, AI agents, will further reinforce the need for specialized AI security incident reporting advancements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:50:26Z)
• Towards Type Agnostic Cyber Defense Agents [0.0]
  Cyber threats have continued to grow, leading to labor shortages and a skills gap in cybersecurity.<n>Many cybersecurity product vendors and security organizations have looked to artificial intelligence to shore up their defenses.<n>This work considers how to characterize attackers and defenders in one approach to the automation of cyber defense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T14:32:18Z)
• Countering Autonomous Cyber Threats [40.00865970939829]
  Foundation Models present dual-use concerns broadly and within the cyber domain specifically. Recent research has shown the potential for these advanced models to inform or independently execute offensive cyberspace operations. This work evaluates several state-of-the-art FMs on their ability to compromise machines in an isolated network and investigates defensive mechanisms to defeat such AI-powered attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T22:46:44Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security (AICS) Workshop at AAAI 2022 [55.573187938617636]
  The workshop will focus on the application of AI to problems in cyber security. Cyber systems generate large volumes of data, utilizing this effectively is beyond human capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T18:27:41Z)
• Fixed Points in Cyber Space: Rethinking Optimal Evasion Attacks in the Age of AI-NIDS [70.60975663021952]
  We study blackbox adversarial attacks on network classifiers. We argue that attacker-defender fixed points are themselves general-sum games with complex phase transitions. We show that a continual learning approach is required to study attacker-defender dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-23T23:42:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.