What makes an entity salient in discourse?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16464v1
• Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2025 15:30:40 GMT
• Title: What makes an entity salient in discourse?
• Authors: Amir Zeldes, Jessica Lin,
• Abstract summary: Main participants, objects and locations are noticeable and memorable, while tangential ones are less important and quickly forgotten.<n>Using a graded operationalization of salience based on summary-worthiness in multiple summaries of a discourse, this paper explores data from 24 spoken and written genres of English.<n>Our results show that while previous approaches to salience all correlate with our salience scores to some extent, no single generalization is without exceptions.
• Score: 8.185354486103291
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Entities in discourse vary broadly in salience: main participants, objects and locations are noticeable and memorable, while tangential ones are less important and quickly forgotten, raising questions about how humans signal and infer relative salience. Using a graded operationalization of salience based on summary-worthiness in multiple summaries of a discourse, this paper explores data from 24 spoken and written genres of English to extract a multifactorial complex of overt and implicit linguistic cues, such as recurring subjecthood or definiteness, discourse relations and hierarchy across utterances, as well as pragmatic functional inferences based on genre and communicative intent. Tackling the question 'how is the degree of salience expressed for each and every entity mentioned?' our results show that while previous approaches to salience all correlate with our salience scores to some extent, no single generalization is without exceptions, and the phenomenon cuts across all levels of linguistic representation.

Related papers

• Dialogues Aspect-based Sentiment Quadruple Extraction via Structural Entropy Minimization Partitioning [54.25737182568224]
  DiaASQ aims to extract all target-aspect-opinion-sentiment quadruples from a given multi-round, multi-participant dialogue.<n>We introduce a two-step framework for quadruple extraction: first extracting individual sentiment elements at the utterance level, then matching quadruples at the sub-dialogue level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T04:22:17Z)
• Non-verbal information in spontaneous speech -- towards a new framework of analysis [0.5559722082623594]
  This paper offers an analytical schema and a technological proof-of-concept for the categorization of prosodic signals. We present a classification process that disentangles prosodic phenomena of three orders. Disentangling prosodic patterns can direct a theory of communication and speech organization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T08:03:05Z)
• Acoustic and linguistic representations for speech continuous emotion recognition in call center conversations [2.0653090022137697]
  We explore the use of pre-trained speech representations as a form of transfer learning towards AlloSat corpus. Our experiments confirm the large gain in performance obtained with the use of pre-trained features. Surprisingly, we found that the linguistic content is clearly the major contributor for the prediction of satisfaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T10:22:51Z)
• DiPlomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoning [89.92601337474954]
  Pragmatic reasoning plays a pivotal role in deciphering implicit meanings that frequently arise in real-life conversations. We introduce a novel challenge, DiPlomat, aiming at benchmarking machines' capabilities on pragmatic reasoning and situated conversational understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T10:41:23Z)
• Revisiting Conversation Discourse for Dialogue Disentanglement [88.3386821205896]
  We propose enhancing dialogue disentanglement by taking full advantage of the dialogue discourse characteristics. We develop a structure-aware framework to integrate the rich structural features for better modeling the conversational semantic context. Our work has great potential to facilitate broader multi-party multi-thread dialogue applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T19:17:47Z)
• Hierarchical Pronunciation Assessment with Multi-Aspect Attention [3.6825890616838066]
  We propose a Hierarchical Pronunciation Assessment with Multi-aspect Attention (HiPAMA) model. HiPAMA hierarchically represents the granularity levels to directly capture their linguistic structures and introduces multi-aspect attention. Remarkable improvements in the experimental results on the speachocean datasets demonstrate the robustness of HiPAMA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T12:49:35Z)
• Who says like a style of Vitamin: Towards Syntax-Aware DialogueSummarization using Multi-task Learning [2.251583286448503]
  We focus on the association between utterances from individual speakers and unique syntactic structures. Speakers have unique textual styles that can contain linguistic information, such as voiceprint. We employ multi-task learning of both syntax-aware information and dialogue summarization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T05:30:39Z)
• Did they answer? Subjective acts and intents in conversational discourse [48.63528550837949]
  We present the first discourse dataset with multiple and subjective interpretations of English conversation. We show disagreements are nuanced and require a deeper understanding of the different contextual factors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T16:34:19Z)
• My Teacher Thinks The World Is Flat! Interpreting Automatic Essay Scoring Mechanism [71.34160809068996]
  Recent work shows that automated scoring systems are prone to even common-sense adversarial samples. We utilize recent advances in interpretability to find the extent to which features such as coherence, content and relevance are important for automated scoring mechanisms. We also find that since the models are not semantically grounded with world-knowledge and common sense, adding false facts such as the world is flat'' actually increases the score instead of decreasing it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-27T06:19:20Z)
• Aspectuality Across Genre: A Distributional Semantics Approach [25.816944882581343]
  The interpretation of the lexical aspect of verbs in English plays a crucial role for recognizing textual entailment and learning discourse-level inferences. We show that two elementary dimensions of aspectual class, states vs. events, and telic vs. atelic events, can be modelled effectively with distributional semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-31T19:37:22Z)
• Paragraph-level Commonsense Transformers with Recurrent Memory [77.4133779538797]
  We train a discourse-aware model that incorporates paragraph-level information to generate coherent commonsense inferences from narratives. Our results show that PARA-COMET outperforms the sentence-level baselines, particularly in generating inferences that are both coherent and novel.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-04T05:24:12Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.