Evolving Collective Cognition in Human-Agent Hybrid Societies: How Agents Form Stances and Boundaries

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17366v1
• Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 13:50:18 GMT
• Title: Evolving Collective Cognition in Human-Agent Hybrid Societies: How Agents Form Stances and Boundaries
• Authors: Hanzhong Zhang, Muhua Huang, Jindong Wang,
• Abstract summary: We investigate how group stance differentiation and social boundary formation emerge in human-agent hybrid societies.<n>We find that agents exhibit endogenous stances, independent of their preset identities.<n>Our findings suggest that preset identities do not rigidly determine the agents' social structures.
• Score: 12.68373270583966
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models have been widely used to simulate credible human social behaviors. However, it remains unclear whether these models can demonstrate stable capacities for stance formation and identity negotiation in complex interactions, as well as how they respond to human interventions. We propose a computational multi-agent society experiment framework that integrates generative agent-based modeling with virtual ethnographic methods to investigate how group stance differentiation and social boundary formation emerge in human-agent hybrid societies. Across three studies, we find that agents exhibit endogenous stances, independent of their preset identities, and display distinct tonal preferences and response patterns to different discourse strategies. Furthermore, through language interaction, agents actively dismantle existing identity-based power structures and reconstruct self-organized community boundaries based on these stances. Our findings suggest that preset identities do not rigidly determine the agents' social structures. For human researchers to effectively intervene in collective cognition, attention must be paid to the endogenous mechanisms and interactional dynamics within the agents' language networks. These insights provide a theoretical foundation for using generative AI in modeling group social dynamics and studying human-agent collaboration.

Related papers

• MoltNet: Understanding Social Behavior of AI Agents in the Agent-Native MoltBook [26.126469624250916]
  MoltNet is a large-scale empirical analysis of agent interaction on MoltBook.<n>We examine behavior along four dimensions: intent and motivation, norms and templates, incentives and behavioral drift, emotion and contagion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T21:03:59Z)
• The Rise of AI Agent Communities: Large-Scale Analysis of Discourse and Interaction on Moltbook [62.2627874717318]
  Moltbook is a Reddit-like social platform where AI agents create posts and interact with other agents through comments and replies.<n>Using a public API snapshot collected about five days after launch, we address three research questions: what AI agents discuss, how they post, and how they interact.<n>We show that agents' writing is predominantly neutral, with positivity appearing in community engagement and assistance-oriented content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T05:28:31Z)
• Exploring Silicon-Based Societies: An Early Study of the Moltbook Agent Community [0.5394948236100675]
  This paper introduces data-driven silicon sociology as a systematic empirical framework for studying social structure formation among interacting artificial agents.<n>We present a pioneering large-scale data mining investigation of an in-the-wild agent society by analyzing Moltbook, a social platform designed primarily for agent-to-agent interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T11:08:38Z)
• Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z)
• Learning to Make Friends: Coaching LLM Agents toward Emergent Social Ties [3.1146704506932985]
  Large language model (LLM) agents reproduce the complex social dynamics that characterize human online behavior.<n>We present a multi-agent LLM simulation framework in which agents repeatedly interact, evaluate one another, and adapt their behavior through in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T07:00:33Z)
• Relational Dissonance in Human-AI Interactions: The Case of Knowledge Work [4.678160092569168]
  We find that fundamental ontological and relational ambiguities inherent in anthropomorphic conversational agents make it difficult for individuals to maintain consistent relational stances toward them.<n>Our findings indicate that people's articulated positioning toward such agents often differs from the relational dynamics that occur during interactions.<n>We propose the concept of relational dissonance to help researchers, designers, and policymakers recognize the resulting tensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-19T10:15:55Z)
• Internet of Agents: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [68.9543153075464]
  We introduce the Internet of Agents (IoA) as a foundational framework that enables seamless interconnection, dynamic discovery, and collaborative orchestration among heterogeneous agents at scale.<n>We analyze the key operational enablers of IoA, including capability notification and discovery, adaptive communication protocols, dynamic task matching, consensus and conflict-resolution mechanisms, and incentive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T02:04:37Z)
• Emergence of human-like polarization among large language model agents [79.96817421756668]
  We simulate a networked system involving thousands of large language model agents, discovering their social interactions, result in human-like polarization.<n>Similarities between humans and LLM agents raise concerns about their capacity to amplify societal polarization, but also hold the potential to serve as a valuable testbed for identifying plausible strategies to mitigate polarization and its consequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T11:45:05Z)
• Generative Agent Simulations of 1,000 People [56.82159813294894]
  We present a novel agent architecture that simulates the attitudes and behaviors of 1,052 real individuals. The generative agents replicate participants' responses on the General Social Survey 85% as accurately as participants replicate their own answers. Our architecture reduces accuracy biases across racial and ideological groups compared to agents given demographic descriptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-15T11:14:34Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, a framework for better data construction and model tuning.<n>For insufficient data usage, we incorporate strategies such as Chain-of-Thought prompting and anti-induction.<n>For rigid behavior patterns, we design the tuning process and introduce automated DPO to enhance the specificity and dynamism of the models' personalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Multi-Agent Imitation Learning with Copulas [102.27052968901894]
  Multi-agent imitation learning aims to train multiple agents to perform tasks from demonstrations by learning a mapping between observations and actions. In this paper, we propose to use copula, a powerful statistical tool for capturing dependence among random variables, to explicitly model the correlation and coordination in multi-agent systems. Our proposed model is able to separately learn marginals that capture the local behavioral patterns of each individual agent, as well as a copula function that solely and fully captures the dependence structure among agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-10T03:49:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.