GitTaskBench: A Benchmark for Code Agents Solving Real-World Tasks Through Code Repository Leveraging

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18993v2
• Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 17:21:03 GMT
• Title: GitTaskBench: A Benchmark for Code Agents Solving Real-World Tasks Through Code Repository Leveraging
• Authors: Ziyi Ni, Huacan Wang, Shuo Zhang, Shuo Lu, Ziyang He, Wang You, Zhenheng Tang, Yuntao Du, Bill Sun, Hongzhang Liu, Sen Hu, Ronghao Chen, Bo Li, Xin Li, Chen Hu, Binxing Jiao, Daxin Jiang, Pin Lyu,
• Abstract summary: We release GitTaskBench, a benchmark for evaluating code agents in real-world scenarios.<n>Each task pairs a relevant repository with an automated, human-curated evaluation harness.<n>We also propose the alpha-value metric to quantify the economic benefit of agent performance.
• Score: 41.754784344572286
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Beyond scratch coding, exploiting large-scale code repositories (e.g., GitHub) for practical tasks is vital in real-world software development, yet current benchmarks rarely evaluate code agents in such authentic, workflow-driven scenarios. To bridge this gap, we introduce GitTaskBench, a benchmark designed to systematically assess this capability via 54 realistic tasks across 7 modalities and 7 domains. Each task pairs a relevant repository with an automated, human-curated evaluation harness specifying practical success criteria. Beyond measuring execution and task success, we also propose the alpha-value metric to quantify the economic benefit of agent performance, which integrates task success rates, token cost, and average developer salaries. Experiments across three state-of-the-art agent frameworks with multiple advanced LLMs show that leveraging code repositories for complex task solving remains challenging: even the best-performing system, OpenHands+Claude 3.7, solves only 48.15% of tasks (recent progress has pushed the frontier further, with RepoMaster+Claude 3.5 achieving a new record of 62.96%). Error analysis attributes over half of failures to seemingly mundane yet critical steps like environment setup and dependency resolution, highlighting the need for more robust workflow management and increased timeout preparedness. By releasing GitTaskBench, we aim to drive progress and attention toward repository-aware code reasoning, execution, and deployment -- moving agents closer to solving complex, end-to-end real-world tasks. The benchmark and code are open-sourced at https://github.com/QuantaAlpha/GitTaskBench.

Related papers

• Hybrid-Gym: Training Coding Agents to Generalize Across Tasks [59.95803522351185]
  In this paper, we describe some transferable skills that are shared across diverse tasks.<n>We propose a training environment, Hybrid-Gym, consisting of a set of scalable synthetic tasks.<n>Experiments show that agents trained on our synthetic tasks effectively generalize diverse real-world tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T19:30:55Z)
• FeatureBench: Benchmarking Agentic Coding for Complex Feature Development [42.26354337364403]
  FeatureBench is a benchmark designed to evaluate agentic coding performance in end-to-end, feature-oriented software development.<n>It incorporates an execution-based evaluation protocol and a scalable test-driven method that automatically derives tasks from code repositories with minimal human effort.<n> Empirical evaluation reveals that the state-of-the-art agentic model, such as Claude 4.5 Opus, achieves a 74.4% resolved rate on SWE-bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T16:06:32Z)
• ProjDevBench: Benchmarking AI Coding Agents on End-to-End Project Development [49.63491095660809]
  ProjDevBench is an end-to-end benchmark that provides project requirements to coding agents and evaluates the resulting repositories.<n>We curate 20 programming problems across 8 categories, covering both concept-oriented tasks and real-world application scenarios.<n>Our evaluation reports an overall acceptance rate of 27.38%: agents handle basic functionality but struggle with complex system design, time optimization, and resource management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T05:17:23Z)
• Terminal-Bench: Benchmarking Agents on Hard, Realistic Tasks in Command Line Interfaces [126.23612941699565]
  Terminal-Bench 2.0 is a benchmark composed of 89 tasks in computer terminal environments inspired by problems from real world.<n>We show that frontier models and agents score less than 65% on the benchmark.<n>We publish the dataset and evaluation harness to assist developers and researchers in future work at https://www.tbench.ai/.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-17T01:29:30Z)
• ABC-Bench: Benchmarking Agentic Backend Coding in Real-World Development [72.4729759618632]
  We introduce ABC-Bench, a benchmark to evaluate agentic backend coding within a realistic, executable workflow.<n>We curated 224 practical tasks spanning 8 languages and 19 frameworks from open-source repositories.<n>Our evaluation reveals that even state-of-the-art models struggle to deliver reliable performance on these holistic tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T08:23:52Z)
• Towards Reliable Code-as-Policies: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Embodied Task Planning [25.860785629018356]
  We propose a neuro-symbolic embodied task planning framework that incorporates explicit symbolic verification and interactive validation processes during code generation.<n>We evaluate our framework on RLBench and in real-world settings across dynamic, partially observable scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T10:01:08Z)
• SetupBench: Assessing Software Engineering Agents' Ability to Bootstrap Development Environments [2.184775414778289]
  We introduce setupbench, a benchmark that isolates the environment-bootstrap skill.<n>Our tasks span seven language ecosystems, five database engines, and multi-service orchestration scenarios.<n>We find low success rates across task categories, with particular challenges in repository setup (38.9-57.4%) and local database configuration (20.0-53.3%)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T22:45:07Z)
• RefactorBench: Evaluating Stateful Reasoning in Language Agents Through Code [7.156224931977546]
  We introduce RefactorBench, a benchmark consisting of 100 large handcrafted multi-file tasks in popular open-source repositories.<n> Baselines reveal that current LM agents struggle with simple compositional tasks, solving only 22% of tasks with base instructions.<n>By adapting a baseline agent to condition on representations of state, we achieve a 43.9% improvement in solving RefactorBench tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T20:23:24Z)
• Automated Benchmark Generation for Repository-Level Coding Tasks [7.305342793164905]
  SetUpAgent is a fully automated system capable of historically accurate dependency setup, test execution, and result parsing.<n>We generate two new datasets: (i) SWEE-Bench an extended version of SWE-Bench encompassing hundreds of repositories, and (ii) SWA-Bench a benchmark focusing on applications rather than libraries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T17:42:49Z)
• Codev-Bench: How Do LLMs Understand Developer-Centric Code Completion? [60.84912551069379]
  We present the Code-Development Benchmark (Codev-Bench), a fine-grained, real-world, repository-level, and developer-centric evaluation framework. Codev-Agent is an agent-based system that automates repository crawling, constructs execution environments, extracts dynamic calling chains from existing unit tests, and generates new test samples to avoid data leakage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T09:11:10Z)
• TaskBench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Task Automation [82.2932794189585]
  We introduce TaskBench, a framework to evaluate the capability of large language models (LLMs) in task automation. Specifically, task decomposition, tool selection, and parameter prediction are assessed. Our approach combines automated construction with rigorous human verification, ensuring high consistency with human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T18:02:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.