Whom We Trust, What We Fear: COVID-19 Fear and the Politics of Information

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20146v1
• Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 11:31:56 GMT
• Title: Whom We Trust, What We Fear: COVID-19 Fear and the Politics of Information
• Authors: Daniele Baccega, Paolo Castagno, Antonio Fernández Anta, Juan Marcos Ramirez, Matteo Sereno,
• Abstract summary: We analyzed the relationship between individuals' self-reported levels of fear about COVID-19 and the information sources they rely on.<n>We found that both fear levels and information source usage closely follow COVID-19 infection trends, exhibit strong correlations within each group, and vary significantly across demographic groups.<n>These findings highlight the importance of information ecosystem dynamics in shaping emotional and behavioral responses during large-scale crises.
• Score: 3.2241707757984783
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic triggered not only a global health crisis but also an infodemic, an overload of information from diverse sources influencing public perception and emotional responses. In this context, fear emerged as a central emotional reaction, shaped by both media exposure and demographic factors. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between individuals' self-reported levels of fear about COVID-19 and the information sources they rely on, across nine source categories, including medical experts, government institutions, media, and personal networks. In particular, we defined a score that ranks fear levels based on self-reported concerns about the pandemic, collected through the Delphi CTIS survey in the United States between May 2021 and June 2022. We found that both fear levels and information source usage closely follow COVID-19 infection trends, exhibit strong correlations within each group (fear levels across sources are strongly correlated, as are patterns of source usage), and vary significantly across demographic groups, particularly by age and education. Applying causal inference methods, we showed that the type of information source significantly affects individuals' fear levels. Furthermore, we demonstrated that information source preferences can reliably match the political orientation of U.S. states. These findings highlight the importance of information ecosystem dynamics in shaping emotional and behavioral responses during large-scale crises.

Related papers

• Large language models for newspaper sentiment analysis during COVID-19: The Guardian [0.16777183511743468]
  This study provides a sentiment analysis of The Guardian newspaper during various stages of COVID-19.<n>During the early pandemic stages, public sentiment prioritised urgent crisis response, later shifting focus to addressing the impact on health and the economy.<n>Results indicate that during the early pandemic stages, public sentiment prioritised urgent crisis response, later shifting focus to addressing the impact on health and the economy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T07:10:52Z)
• Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
  Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable. Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs. We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z)
• Coronavirus statistics causes emotional bias: a social media text mining perspective [4.042350304426975]
  This paper proposes a deep learning model which classifies texts related to the pandemic from text data with place labels. Next, it conducts a sentiment analysis based on multi-task learning. Finally, it carries out a fixed-effect panel regression with outputs of the sentiment analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T03:36:13Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Misinformation, Believability, and Vaccine Acceptance Over 40 Countries: Takeaways From the Initial Phase of The COVID-19 Infodemic [11.737540072863405]
  This paper presents findings from a global survey on the extent of worldwide exposure to the COVID-19 infodemic. We find a strong association between perceived believability of misinformation and vaccination hesitancy. We discuss implications of our findings on public campaigns that proactively spread accurate information to countries that are more susceptible to the infodemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-22T05:09:25Z)
• Understanding the temporal evolution of COVID-19 research through machine learning and natural language processing [66.63200823918429]
  The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been continuously affecting human lives and communities around the world. We used multiple data sources, i.e., PubMed and ArXiv, and built several machine learning models to characterize the landscape of current COVID-19 research. Our findings confirm the types of research available in PubMed and ArXiv differ significantly, with the former exhibiting greater diversity in terms of COVID-19 related issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-22T18:02:39Z)
• Information Consumption and Social Response in a Segregated Environment: the Case of Gab [74.5095691235917]
  This work provides a characterization of the interaction patterns within Gab around the COVID-19 topic. We find that there are no strong statistical differences in the social response to questionable and reliable content. Our results provide insights toward the understanding of coordinated inauthentic behavior and on the early-warning of information operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-03T11:34:25Z)
• Critical Impact of Social Networks Infodemic on Defeating Coronavirus COVID-19 Pandemic: Twitter-Based Study and Research Directions [1.6571886312953874]
  An estimated 2.95 billion people in 2019 used social media worldwide. The widespread of the Coronavirus COVID-19 resulted with a tsunami of social media. This paper presents a large-scale study based on data mined from Twitter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T15:53:13Z)
• COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
  Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic. We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z)
• Psychometric Analysis and Coupling of Emotions Between State Bulletins and Twitter in India during COVID-19 Infodemic [7.428097999824421]
  COVID-19 infodemic has been spreading faster than the pandemic itself. Since social media is the largest source of information, managing the infodemic requires mitigating of misinformation. Twitter alone has seen a sharp 45% increase in the usage of its curated events page.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-12T01:51:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.