Coronavirus statistics causes emotional bias: a social media text mining
perspective
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08644v1
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 03:36:13 GMT
- Title: Coronavirus statistics causes emotional bias: a social media text mining
perspective
- Authors: Linjiang Guo, Zijian Feng, Yuxue Chi, Mingzhu Wang, Yijun Liu
- Abstract summary: This paper proposes a deep learning model which classifies texts related to the pandemic from text data with place labels.
Next, it conducts a sentiment analysis based on multi-task learning.
Finally, it carries out a fixed-effect panel regression with outputs of the sentiment analysis.
- Score: 4.042350304426975
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: While COVID-19 has impacted humans for a long time, people search the web for
pandemic-related information, causing anxiety. From a theoretic perspective,
previous studies have confirmed that the number of COVID-19 cases can cause
negative emotions, but how statistics of different dimensions, such as the
number of imported cases, the number of local cases, and the number of
government-designated lockdown zones, stimulate people's emotions requires
detailed understanding. In order to obtain the views of people on COVID-19,
this paper first proposes a deep learning model which classifies texts related
to the pandemic from text data with place labels. Next, it conducts a sentiment
analysis based on multi-task learning. Finally, it carries out a fixed-effect
panel regression with outputs of the sentiment analysis. The performance of the
algorithm shows a promising result. The empirical study demonstrates while the
number of local cases is positively associated with risk perception, the number
of imported cases is negatively associated with confidence levels, which
explains why citizens tend to ascribe the protracted pandemic to foreign
factors. Besides, this study finds that previous pandemic hits cities recover
slowly from the suffering, while local governments' spending on healthcare can
improve the situation. Our study illustrates the reasons for risk perception
and confidence based on different sources of statistical information due to
cognitive bias. It complements the knowledge related to epidemic information.
It also contributes to a framework that combines sentiment analysis using
advanced deep learning technology with the empirical regression method.
Related papers
- A longitudinal sentiment analysis of Sinophobia during COVID-19 using large language models [3.3741245091336083]
The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated xenophobia, particularly Sinophobia, leading to widespread discrimination against individuals of Chinese descent.
We present a sentiment analysis framework utilising LLMs for longitudinal sentiment analysis of the Sinophobic sentiments expressed in X (Twitter) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The results show a significant correlation between the spikes in Sinophobic tweets, Sinophobic sentiments and surges in COVID-19 cases, revealing that the evolution of the pandemic influenced public sentiment and the prevalence of Sinophobic discourse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-29T23:39:11Z) - Large language models for sentiment analysis of newspaper articles during COVID-19: The Guardian [0.16777183511743468]
This study provides a sentiment analysis of The Guardian newspaper during various stages of COVID-19.
During the early pandemic stages, public sentiment prioritised urgent crisis response, later shifting focus to addressing the impact on health and the economy.
Results indicate that during the early pandemic stages, public sentiment prioritised urgent crisis response, later shifting focus to addressing the impact on health and the economy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-20T07:10:52Z) - Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable.
Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs.
We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z) - #StayHome or #Marathon? Social Media Enhanced Pandemic Surveillance on
Spatial-temporal Dynamic Graphs [23.67939019353524]
COVID-19 has caused lasting damage to almost every domain in public health, society, and economy.
Existing studies rely on the aggregation of traditional statistical models and epidemic spread theory.
We propose a novel framework, Social Media enhAnced pandemic knowledge based on the extracted events and relationships.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-08T15:46:05Z) - Sentiment and Emotion Classification of Epidemic Related Bilingual data
from Social Media [1.7109522466982476]
The study exploits the bilingual (Urdu and English) data from Twitter and NEWS websites related to the dengue epidemic in Pakistan.
The proposed study exploits the bilingual (Urdu and English) data from Twitter and NEWS websites related to the dengue epidemic in Pakistan.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-04T12:51:18Z) - Country Image in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of China [79.17323278601869]
Country image has a profound influence on international relations and economic development.
In the worldwide outbreak of COVID-19, countries and their people display different reactions.
In this study, we take China as a specific and typical case and investigate its image with aspect-based sentiment analysis on a large-scale Twitter dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-12T15:54:51Z) - Public risk perception and emotion on Twitter during the Covid-19
pandemic [0.0]
Natural language analysis of this text enables near-to-real-time monitoring of indicators of public risk perception.
We compare epidemiological indicators of the progression of the pandemic with indicators of the public perception of the pandemic constructed from 20 million unique Covid-19-related tweets.
We find evidence of psychophysical numbing: Twitter users increasingly fixate on mortality, but in a decreasingly emotional and increasingly analytic tone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-03T13:09:45Z) - Understanding the temporal evolution of COVID-19 research through
machine learning and natural language processing [66.63200823918429]
The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been continuously affecting human lives and communities around the world.
We used multiple data sources, i.e., PubMed and ArXiv, and built several machine learning models to characterize the landscape of current COVID-19 research.
Our findings confirm the types of research available in PubMed and ArXiv differ significantly, with the former exhibiting greater diversity in terms of COVID-19 related issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-22T18:02:39Z) - Effectiveness and Compliance to Social Distancing During COVID-19 [72.94965109944707]
We use a detailed set of mobility data to evaluate the impact that stay-at-home orders had on the spread of COVID-19 in the US.
We show that there is a unidirectional Granger causality, from the median percentage of time spent daily at home to the daily number of COVID-19-related deaths with a lag of 2 weeks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-23T03:36:19Z) - Cross-lingual Transfer Learning for COVID-19 Outbreak Alignment [90.12602012910465]
We train on Italy's early COVID-19 outbreak through Twitter and transfer to several other countries.
Our experiments show strong results with up to 0.85 Spearman correlation in cross-country predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-05T02:04:25Z) - COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic.
We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.