Reusable Test Suites for Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.21553v1
• Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 12:10:05 GMT
• Title: Reusable Test Suites for Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Jørn Eirik Betten, Quentin Mazouni, Dennis Gross, Pedro Lind, Helge Spieker,
• Abstract summary: This work presents Multi-Policy Test Case Selection (MPTCS), a novel automated test suite selection method for RL environments.<n>MPTCS uses a set of policies to select a diverse collection of reusable policy-agnostic test cases that reveal typical flaws in the agents' behavior.<n>We assess the effectiveness of the difficulty score and how the method's effectiveness and cost depend on the number of policies in the set.
• Score: 1.5826476446078004
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) agents show great promise in solving sequential decision-making tasks. However, validating the reliability and performance of the agent policies' behavior for deployment remains challenging. Most reinforcement learning policy testing methods produce test suites tailored to the agent policy being tested, and their relevance to other policies is unclear. This work presents Multi-Policy Test Case Selection (MPTCS), a novel automated test suite selection method for RL environments, designed to extract test cases generated by any policy testing framework based on their solvability, diversity, and general difficulty. MPTCS uses a set of policies to select a diverse collection of reusable policy-agnostic test cases that reveal typical flaws in the agents' behavior. The set of policies selects test cases from a candidate pool, which can be generated by any policy testing method, based on a difficulty score. We assess the effectiveness of the difficulty score and how the method's effectiveness and cost depend on the number of policies in the set. Additionally, a method for promoting diversity in the test suite, a discretized general test case descriptor surface inspired by quality-diversity algorithms, is examined to determine how it covers the state space and which policies it triggers to produce faulty behaviors.

Related papers

• When to Act, Ask, or Learn: Uncertainty-Aware Policy Steering [10.01278648231868]
  Policy steering is an emerging way to adapt robot behaviors at deployment-time.<n> Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are promising general-purpose verifiers due to their reasoning capabilities.<n>We propose uncertainty-aware policy steering (UPS), a framework that jointly reasons about semantic task uncertainty and low-level action feasibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T23:23:22Z)
• Learning Deterministic Policies with Policy Gradients in Constrained Markov Decision Processes [59.27926064817273]
  We introduce an exploration-agnostic algorithm, called C-PG, which enjoys global last-iterate convergence guarantees under domination assumptions.<n>We empirically validate both the action-based (C-PGAE) and parameter-based (C-PGPE) variants of C-PG on constrained control tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T10:29:05Z)
• TestAgent: An Adaptive and Intelligent Expert for Human Assessment [62.060118490577366]
  We propose TestAgent, a large language model (LLM)-powered agent designed to enhance adaptive testing through interactive engagement.<n>TestAgent supports personalized question selection, captures test-takers' responses and anomalies, and provides precise outcomes through dynamic, conversational interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T16:07:54Z)
• Exploring Critical Testing Scenarios for Decision-Making Policies: An LLM Approach [14.32199539218175]
  This paper proposes an adaptable Large Language Model (LLM)-driven online testing framework to explore critical and diverse testing scenarios.<n>Specifically, we design a "generate-test-feedback" pipeline with templated prompt engineering to harness the world knowledge and reasoning abilities of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-09T17:27:04Z)
• Test Where Decisions Matter: Importance-driven Testing for Deep Reinforcement Learning [7.0247398611254175]
  In many Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) problems, decisions in a trained policy vary in significance for the expected safety and performance of the policy. We propose a novel model-based method to rigorously compute a ranking of state importance across the entire state space. We then focus our testing efforts on the highest-ranked states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T10:26:44Z)
• How Generalizable Is My Behavior Cloning Policy? A Statistical Approach to Trustworthy Performance Evaluation [17.638831964639834]
  Behavior cloning policies are increasingly successful at solving complex tasks by learning from human demonstrations. We present a framework that provides a tight lower-bound on robot performance in an arbitrary environment. In experiments we evaluate policies for visuomotor manipulation in both simulation and hardware.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T22:00:35Z)
• Learning Optimal Deterministic Policies with Stochastic Policy Gradients [62.81324245896716]
  Policy gradient (PG) methods are successful approaches to deal with continuous reinforcement learning (RL) problems. In common practice, convergence (hyper)policies are learned only to deploy their deterministic version. We show how to tune the exploration level used for learning to optimize the trade-off between the sample complexity and the performance of the deployed deterministic policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T16:45:15Z)
• Testing for Fault Diversity in Reinforcement Learning [13.133263651395865]
  We argue that policy testing should not find as many failures as possible (e.g., inputs that trigger similar car crashes) but rather aim at revealing as informative and diverse faults as possible in the model. We show that QD optimisation, while being conceptually simple and generally applicable, finds effectively more diverse faults in the decision model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T09:46:30Z)
• Composing Efficient, Robust Tests for Policy Selection [32.68102141512562]
  We introduce RPOSST, an algorithm to select a small set of test cases from a larger pool. RPOSST treats the test case selection problem as a two-player game, and prioritizes a solution with provable $k$-of-$N$ robustness. Empirical results demonstrate that RPOSST finds a small set of test cases that identify high quality policies in a toy one-shot game, poker datasets, and a high-fidelity racing simulator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T18:55:56Z)
• Learnable Behavior Control: Breaking Atari Human World Records via Sample-Efficient Behavior Selection [56.87650511573298]
  We propose a general framework called Learnable Behavioral Control (LBC) to address the limitation. Our agents have achieved 10077.52% mean human normalized score and surpassed 24 human world records within 1B training frames.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T08:00:23Z)
• Conformal Off-Policy Evaluation in Markov Decision Processes [53.786439742572995]
  Reinforcement Learning aims at identifying and evaluating efficient control policies from data. Most methods for this learning task, referred to as Off-Policy Evaluation (OPE), do not come with accuracy and certainty guarantees. We present a novel OPE method based on Conformal Prediction that outputs an interval containing the true reward of the target policy with a prescribed level of certainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T16:45:11Z)
• Policy Dispersion in Non-Markovian Environment [53.05904889617441]
  This paper tries to learn the diverse policies from the history of state-action pairs under a non-Markovian environment. We first adopt a transformer-based method to learn policy embeddings. Then, we stack the policy embeddings to construct a dispersion matrix to induce a set of diverse policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T11:58:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.