Per-sender neural network classifiers for email authorship validation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.00005v1
• Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2025 17:58:16 GMT
• Title: Per-sender neural network classifiers for email authorship validation
• Authors: Rohit Dube,
• Abstract summary: Business email compromise and lateral spear phishing attacks are among modern organizations' most costly and damaging threats.<n>Authorship validation is a lightweight, real-time defense that complements traditional detection methods by modeling per-sender writing style.<n>The paper evaluates two classifiers -- a Naive Bayes model and a character-level convolutional neural network (Char-CNN) -- for the authorship validation task.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Business email compromise and lateral spear phishing attacks are among modern organizations' most costly and damaging threats. While inbound phishing defenses have improved significantly, most organizations still trust internal emails by default, leaving themselves vulnerable to attacks from compromised employee accounts. In this work, we define and explore the problem of authorship validation: verifying whether a claimed sender actually authored a given email. Authorship validation is a lightweight, real-time defense that complements traditional detection methods by modeling per-sender writing style. Further, the paper presents a collection of new datasets based on the Enron corpus. These simulate inauthentic messages using both human-written and large language model-generated emails. The paper also evaluates two classifiers -- a Naive Bayes model and a character-level convolutional neural network (Char-CNN) -- for the authorship validation task. Our experiments show that the Char-CNN model achieves high accuracy and F1 scores under various circumstances. Finally, we discuss deployment considerations and show that per-sender authorship classifiers are practical for integrating into existing commercial email security systems with low overhead.

Related papers

• CREDIT: Certified Ownership Verification of Deep Neural Networks Against Model Extraction Attacks [54.04030169323115]
  We introduce CREDIT, a certified ownership verification against Model Extraction Attacks (MEAs)<n>We quantify the similarity between DNN models, propose a practical verification threshold, and provide rigorous theoretical guarantees for ownership verification based on this threshold.<n>We extensively evaluate our approach on several mainstream datasets across different domains and tasks, achieving state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T23:36:25Z)
• Constructing and Benchmarking: a Labeled Email Dataset for Text-Based Phishing and Spam Detection Framework [0.37687375904925485]
  This study presents a comprehensive email dataset containing phishing, spam, and legitimate messages.<n>Each email is annotated with its category, emotional appeal, authority, and underlying motivation.<n>Results highlight strong phishing detection capabilities but reveal persistent challenges in distinguishing spam from legitimate emails.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T14:40:06Z)
• LLM-Powered Intent-Based Categorization of Phishing Emails [0.0]
  This paper investigates the practical potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) to detect phishing emails by focusing on their intent.<n>We introduce an intent-type taxonomy, which is operationalized by the LLMs to classify emails into distinct categories and, therefore, generate actionable threat information.<n>Our results demonstrate that existing LLMs are capable of detecting and categorizing phishing emails, underscoring their potential in this domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T09:21:55Z)
• Debate-Driven Multi-Agent LLMs for Phishing Email Detection [0.0]
  We propose a multi-agent large language model (LLM) prompting technique that simulates deceptive debates among agents to detect phishing emails.<n>Our approach uses two LLM agents to present arguments for or against the classification task, with a judge agent adjudicating the final verdict.<n>Results show that the debate structure itself is sufficient to yield accurate decisions without extra prompting strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T23:18:14Z)
• Reformulation is All You Need: Addressing Malicious Text Features in DNNs [53.45564571192014]
  We propose a unified and adaptive defense framework that is effective against both adversarial and backdoor attacks.<n>Our framework outperforms existing sample-oriented defense baselines across a diverse range of malicious textual features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T03:39:43Z)
• Prompted Contextual Vectors for Spear-Phishing Detection [41.26408609344205]
  Spear-phishing attacks present a significant security challenge.<n>We propose a detection approach based on a novel document vectorization method.<n>Our method achieves a 91% F1 score in identifying LLM-generated spear-phishing emails.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T09:12:55Z)
• Verifying the Robustness of Automatic Credibility Assessment [50.55687778699995]
  We show that meaning-preserving changes in input text can mislead the models. We also introduce BODEGA: a benchmark for testing both victim models and attack methods on misinformation detection tasks. Our experimental results show that modern large language models are often more vulnerable to attacks than previous, smaller solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-14T16:11:47Z)
• Profiler: Profile-Based Model to Detect Phishing Emails [15.109679047753355]
  We propose a multidimensional risk assessment of emails to reduce the feasibility of an attacker adapting their email and avoiding detection. We develop a risk assessment framework that includes three models which analyse an email's (1) threat level, (2) cognitive manipulation, and (3) email type. Our Profiler can be used in conjunction with ML approaches, to reduce their misclassifications or as a labeller for large email data sets in the training stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-18T10:01:55Z)
• Robust and Verifiable Information Embedding Attacks to Deep Neural Networks via Error-Correcting Codes [81.85509264573948]
  In the era of deep learning, a user often leverages a third-party machine learning tool to train a deep neural network (DNN) classifier. In an information embedding attack, an attacker is the provider of a malicious third-party machine learning tool. In this work, we aim to design information embedding attacks that are verifiable and robust against popular post-processing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T17:42:42Z)
• Backdoor Attack against Speaker Verification [86.43395230456339]
  We show that it is possible to inject the hidden backdoor for infecting speaker verification models by poisoning the training data. We also demonstrate that existing backdoor attacks cannot be directly adopted in attacking speaker verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T11:10:08Z)
• Learning with Weak Supervision for Email Intent Detection [56.71599262462638]
  We propose to leverage user actions as a source of weak supervision to detect intents in emails. We develop an end-to-end robust deep neural network model for email intent identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-26T23:41:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.