DaMoC: Efficiently Selecting the Optimal Large Language Model for Fine-tuning Domain Tasks Based on Data and Model Compression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01221v2
• Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 09:30:16 GMT
• Title: DaMoC: Efficiently Selecting the Optimal Large Language Model for Fine-tuning Domain Tasks Based on Data and Model Compression
• Authors: Wei Huang, Huang Wei, Yinggui Wang,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) excel in general tasks but struggle with domain-specific ones, requiring fine-tuning with specific data.<n>We introduce a Data and Model Compression Framework (DaMoC) that addresses this challenge.<n>We show that we can select the optimal LLM while saving approximately 20-fold in training time.
• Score: 7.1654056866441245
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) excel in general tasks but struggle with domain-specific ones, requiring fine-tuning with specific data. With many open-source LLMs available, selecting the best model for fine-tuning downstream tasks is challenging, primarily focusing on how to quickly identify the optimal LLM. We introduce a Data and Model Compression Framework (DaMoC) that addresses this challenge by: 1) Data Level: A systematic categorization of data filtering methodologies for LLMs is first established, classifying them into three distinct paradigms: (1) distribution-aware methods, (2) quality-aware methods, and (3) hybrid approaches considering both dimensions. Further, we enhance the density of key tokens in the text achieving token compression. Subsequently, we use an LLM to iterative rewrite the text to optimize its expression. 2) Model Level: We use layer similarity scores to assess each layer's importance and remove those with lower importance. Then, we introduce a sparse merging paradigm to preserve as much of the original model's capability as possible. Extensive experiments on four datasets, medical Q&A, financial Q&A, general Q&A, and reading comprehension, show that we can select the optimal LLM while saving approximately 20-fold in training time.

Related papers

• Fine-Tuning Causal LLMs for Text Classification: Embedding-Based vs. Instruction-Based Approaches [0.0]
  We explore strategies to fine-tune decoder-only Large Language Models (LLMs) for downstream text classification under resource constraints.<n>Two approaches are investigated: (1) attaching a classification head to a pre-trained causal LLM and fine-tuning on the task, and (2) instruction-tuning the LLM in a prompt->response format for classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T13:02:06Z)
• Can LLM Annotations Replace User Clicks for Learning to Rank? [112.2254432364736]
  Large-scale supervised data is essential for training modern ranking models, but obtaining high-quality human annotations is costly.<n>Click data has been widely used as a low-cost alternative, and with recent advances in large language models (LLMs), LLM-based relevance annotation has emerged as another promising annotation.<n> Experiments on both a public dataset, TianGong-ST, and an industrial dataset, Baidu-Click, show that click-supervised models perform better on high-frequency queries.<n>We explore two training strategies -- data scheduling and frequency-aware multi-objective learning -- that integrate both supervision signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T02:26:14Z)
• Are Prompts All You Need? Evaluating Prompt-Based Large Language Models (LLM)s for Software Requirements Classification [1.1458853556386799]
  This study tests whether prompt based large language models can reduce data needs.<n>We benchmark several models and prompting styles across multiple tasks on two English datasets, PROMISE and SecReq.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T09:58:26Z)
• Towards Efficient Multi-LLM Inference: Characterization and Analysis of LLM Routing and Hierarchical Techniques [14.892995952768352]
  Language Models (LMs) have excelled at tasks like text generation, summarization, and question answering.<n>Their inference remains computationally expensive and energy intensive in settings with limited hardware, power, or bandwidth.<n>Recent approaches have introduced multi LLM intelligent model selection strategies that dynamically allocate computational resources based on query complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T23:13:08Z)
• New Dataset and Methods for Fine-Grained Compositional Referring Expression Comprehension via Specialist-MLLM Collaboration [49.180693704510006]
  Referring Expression (REC) is a cross-modal task that evaluates the interplay of language understanding, image comprehension, and language-to-image grounding.<n>It serves as an essential testing ground for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T13:58:44Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• LLM-Select: Feature Selection with Large Language Models [64.5099482021597]
  Large language models (LLMs) are capable of selecting the most predictive features, with performance rivaling the standard tools of data science.<n>Our findings suggest that LLMs may be useful not only for selecting the best features for training but also for deciding which features to collect in the first place.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T22:23:40Z)
• Entity Matching using Large Language Models [3.7277730514654555]
  This paper investigates using generative large language models (LLMs) as a less task-specific training data-dependent alternative to PLM-based matchers. We show that GPT4 can generate structured explanations for matching decisions and can automatically identify potential causes of matching errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T13:12:32Z)
• MLLM-DataEngine: An Iterative Refinement Approach for MLLM [62.30753425449056]
  We propose a novel closed-loop system that bridges data generation, model training, and evaluation. Within each loop, the MLLM-DataEngine first analyze the weakness of the model based on the evaluation results. For targeting, we propose an Adaptive Bad-case Sampling module, which adjusts the ratio of different types of data. For quality, we resort to GPT-4 to generate high-quality data with each given data type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T01:41:04Z)
• LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models [65.02607075556742]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in language understanding and generation. We tackle the compression of LLMs within the bound of two constraints: being task-agnostic and minimizing the reliance on the original training dataset. Our method, named LLM-Pruner, adopts structural pruning that selectively removes non-critical coupled structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T12:10:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.