Vis-CoT: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Interactive Visualization and Intervention in LLM Chain-of-Thought Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01412v1
• Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2025 12:09:43 GMT
• Title: Vis-CoT: A Human-in-the-Loop Framework for Interactive Visualization and Intervention in LLM Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
• Abstract summary: We present Vis-CoT, a human-in-the-loop framework that converts linear chain-of-thought text into an interactive reasoning graph.<n>Users can visualize the logical flow, identify flawed steps, and intervene by pruning incorrect paths and grafting new, user-defined premises.<n> Vis-CoT improves final-answer accuracy by up to 24 percentage points over non-interactive baselines.
• Score: 0.13192560874022083
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) show strong reasoning via chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting, but the process is opaque, which makes verification, debugging, and control difficult in high-stakes settings. We present Vis-CoT, a human-in-the-loop framework that converts linear CoT text into an interactive reasoning graph. Users can visualize the logical flow, identify flawed steps, and intervene by pruning incorrect paths and grafting new, user-defined premises. This shifts interaction from passive observation to active collaboration, steering models toward more accurate and trustworthy conclusions. Across GSM8K and StrategyQA, Vis-CoT improves final-answer accuracy by up to 24 percentage points over non-interactive baselines. A user study also shows large gains in perceived usability and trust. Vis-CoT points to a practical path for more reliable, understandable, and collaborative reasoning by combining LLMs with targeted human oversight.

Related papers

• Balancing Efficiency and Efficacy: Training-Free Attention-Guided Switching Between Explicit and Latent Thoughts for MLLMs [44.74237674161132]
  Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) requires both fine-grained visual perception and rigorous logical deduction.<n>Explicit text-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is computationally expensive and prone to visual hallucinations.<n>Existing latent reasoning methods typically require costly training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-04T10:46:10Z)
• Faithfulness as Information Flow: Evaluating and Training Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [10.87972575497941]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning is useful for monitoring language models.<n>Models can rely on prompt-to-answer shortcuts that bypass the CoT.<n>We study CoT faithfulness through a structural information-flow perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-22T23:37:29Z)
• PDCR: Perception-Decomposed Confidence Reward for Vision-Language Reasoning [80.94559742826083]
  Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) traditionally relies on a sparse, outcome-based signal.<n>Recent work shows that providing a fine-grained, model-intrinsic signal effectively improves language reasoning training by providing step-level guidance without costly external models.<n>While effective for unimodal text, we find that naively applying this global reward to vision-language (V-L) reasoning is a suboptimal strategy.<n>We propose Perception-Decomposed Confidence Reward (PDCR), a framework that solves this by aligning the reward structure with the task's heterogeneous nature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T12:55:18Z)
• Compliance versus Sensibility: On the Reasoning Controllability in Large Language Models [46.26628756478016]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to acquire reasoning capabilities through shared inference patterns in pre-training data.<n>We show that reasoning conflicts are internally detectable, as confidence scores significantly drop during conflicting episodes.<n>Our findings establish that while LLM reasoning is anchored to concrete instances, active mechanistic interventions can effectively decouple logical schemata from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-29T22:55:40Z)
• VG-CoT: Towards Trustworthy Visual Reasoning via Grounded Chain-of-Thought [16.361394107862502]
  We propose the Visual Grounding Chain-of-Thought dataset, which explicitly links each reasoning step to real visual evidence within the image.<n>The pipeline generates step-by-step grounded reasoning with GPT-4o and refines the grounding through a rationale-driven open-set detection process.<n> Experiments with representative LVLMs, including LLaVA-1.5 and Qwen2-VL, demonstrate consistent improvements on most evaluation metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-23T08:04:07Z)
• PromptCD: Test-Time Behavior Enhancement via Polarity-Prompt Contrastive Decoding [85.22047087898311]
  We introduce Polarity-Prompt Contrastive Decoding (PromptCD), a test-time behavior control method that generalizes contrastive decoding to broader enhancement settings.<n>PromptCD constructs paired positive and negative guiding prompts for a target behavior and contrasts model responses to reinforce desirable outcomes.<n>Experiments on the "3H" alignment objectives demonstrate consistent and substantial improvements, indicating that post-trained models can achieve meaningful self-enhancement purely at test time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T08:56:52Z)
• Balancing Faithfulness and Performance in Reasoning via Multi-Listener Soft Execution [79.98699884805636]
  Reasoning Execution by Multiple Listeners (REMUL) is a multi-party reinforcement learning approach.<n>REMUL builds on the hypothesis that reasoning traces which other parties can follow will be more faithful.<n>Speakers are rewarded for producing reasoning that is clear to listeners.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-18T02:55:55Z)
• Guided Verifier: Collaborative Multimodal Reasoning via Dynamic Process Supervision [11.159231524113764]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a pivotal mechanism for enhancing the complex reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>In this paper, we propose the textbfGuided Verifier framework to address these structural limitations.<n>We develop a specialized data synthesis pipeline targeting multimodal hallucinations, constructing textbfCoRe dataset of process-level negatives and textbfCorrect-guide textbfReasoning trajectories to train the guided verifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T07:38:42Z)
• \ extsc{NaVIDA}: Vision-Language Navigation with Inverse Dynamics Augmentation [50.027425808733994]
  textscNaVIDA is a unified VLN framework that couples policy learning with action-grounded visual dynamics and adaptive execution.<n>textscNaVIDA augments training with chunk-based inverse-dynamics supervision to learn causal relationship between visual changes and corresponding actions.<n>Experiments show that textscNaVIDA achieves superior navigation performance compared to state-of-the-art methods with fewer parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T06:16:17Z)
• See, Think, Act: Online Shopper Behavior Simulation with VLM Agents [58.92444959954643]
  This paper investigates the integration of visual information, specifically webpage screenshots, into behavior simulation via VLMs.<n>We employ SFT for joint action prediction and rationale generation, conditioning on the full interaction context.<n>To further enhance reasoning capabilities, we integrate RL with a hierarchical reward structure, scaled by a difficulty-aware factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T05:07:14Z)
• CIR-CoT: Towards Interpretable Composed Image Retrieval via End-to-End Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [93.05917922306196]
  Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) aims to find a target image from a reference image and a modification text.<n>CIR-CoT is the first end-to-end retrieval-oriented MLLM designed to integrate explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T09:41:45Z)
• DeepVIS: Bridging Natural Language and Data Visualization Through Step-wise Reasoning [6.901863663424825]
  We propose integrating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning into the Natural Language to Visualization (NL2VIS) pipeline.<n>First, we design a comprehensive CoT reasoning process for NL2VIS and develop an automatic pipeline to equip existing datasets with structured reasoning steps.<n>Second, we introduce nvBench-CoT, a specialized dataset capturing detailed step-by-step reasoning from ambiguous natural language descriptions to finalized visualizations.<n>Third, we develop DeepVIS, an interactive visual interface that tightly integrates with the CoT reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-03T10:04:17Z)
• Interactive Reasoning: Visualizing and Controlling Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models [54.85405423240165]
  We introduce Interactive Reasoning, an interaction design that visualizes chain-of-thought outputs as a hierarchy of topics.<n>We implement interactive reasoning in Hippo, a prototype for AI-assisted decision making in the face of uncertain trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T10:00:43Z)
• CrossWordBench: Evaluating the Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs and LVLMs with Controllable Puzzle Generation [53.452699232071495]
  We introduce CrossWordBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) through the medium of crossword puzzles.<n>Our evaluation reveals that reasoning LLMs substantially outperform non-reasoning models by effectively leveraging crossing-letter constraints.<n>Our findings highlight limitations of the reasoning capabilities of current LLMs and LVLMs, and provide an effective approach for creating multimodal constrained tasks for future evaluations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T20:03:36Z)
• Derailer-Rerailer: Adaptive Verification for Efficient and Reliable Language Model Reasoning [11.765298236504155]
  Derailer-Rerailer is a novel framework that balances reasoning accuracy and computational efficiency.<n>Our framework achieves significant accuracy improvements (8-11% across various reasoning tasks) while maintaining 2-3 times better efficiency than existing verification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T21:20:17Z)
• Towards Robust Recommendation via Decision Boundary-aware Graph Contrastive Learning [25.514007761856632]
  graph contrastive learning (GCL) has received increasing attention in recommender systems due to its effectiveness in reducing bias caused by data sparsity. We argue that these methods struggle to balance between semantic invariance and view hardness across the dynamic training process. We propose a novel GCL-based recommendation framework RGCL, which effectively maintains the semantic invariance of contrastive pairs and dynamically adapts as the model capability evolves.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T13:03:35Z)
• Cantor: Inspiring Multimodal Chain-of-Thought of MLLM [83.6663322930814]
  We argue that converging visual context acquisition and logical reasoning is pivotal for tackling visual reasoning tasks. We propose an innovative multimodal CoT framework, termed Cantor, characterized by a perception-decision architecture. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed framework, showing significant improvements in multimodal CoT performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T17:59:48Z)
• Vision-and-Language Navigation via Causal Learning [13.221880074458227]
  Cross-modal causal transformer (GOAT) is a pioneering solution rooted in the paradigm of causal inference. BACL and FACL modules promote unbiased learning by comprehensively mitigating potential spurious correlations. To capture global confounder features, we propose a cross-modal feature pooling module supervised by contrastive learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T02:40:35Z)
• Measuring and Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [61.28463542324576]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) have recently demonstrated strong efficacy as visual assistants that can generate human-like outputs. We evaluate existing state-of-the-art VLMs and find that even the best-performing model is unable to demonstrate strong visual reasoning capabilities and consistency. We propose a two-stage training framework aimed at improving both the reasoning performance and consistency of VLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-08T17:49:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.