Measuring and Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.04461v2
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:48:59 GMT
- Title: Measuring and Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- Authors: Yangyi Chen, Karan Sikka, Michael Cogswell, Heng Ji, Ajay Divakaran,
- Abstract summary: Vision-language models (VLMs) have recently demonstrated strong efficacy as visual assistants that can generate human-like outputs.
We evaluate existing state-of-the-art VLMs and find that even the best-performing model is unable to demonstrate strong visual reasoning capabilities and consistency.
We propose a two-stage training framework aimed at improving both the reasoning performance and consistency of VLMs.
- Score: 61.28463542324576
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have recently demonstrated strong efficacy as visual assistants that can parse natural queries about the visual content and generate human-like outputs. In this work, we explore the ability of these models to demonstrate human-like reasoning based on the perceived information. To address a crucial concern regarding the extent to which their reasoning capabilities are fully consistent and grounded, we also measure the reasoning consistency of these models. We achieve this by proposing a chain-of-thought (CoT) based consistency measure. However, such an evaluation requires a benchmark that encompasses both high-level inference and detailed reasoning chains, which is costly. We tackle this challenge by proposing a LLM-Human-in-the-Loop pipeline, which notably reduces cost while simultaneously ensuring the generation of a high-quality dataset. Based on this pipeline and the existing coarse-grained annotated dataset, we build the CURE benchmark to measure both the zero-shot reasoning performance and consistency of VLMs. We evaluate existing state-of-the-art VLMs, and find that even the best-performing model is unable to demonstrate strong visual reasoning capabilities and consistency, indicating that substantial efforts are required to enable VLMs to perform visual reasoning as systematically and consistently as humans. As an early step, we propose a two-stage training framework aimed at improving both the reasoning performance and consistency of VLMs. The first stage involves employing supervised fine-tuning of VLMs using step-by-step reasoning samples automatically generated by LLMs. In the second stage, we further augment the training process by incorporating feedback provided by LLMs to produce reasoning chains that are highly consistent and grounded. We empirically highlight the effectiveness of our framework in both reasoning performance and consistency.
Related papers
- Insight-V: Exploring Long-Chain Visual Reasoning with Multimodal Large Language Models [64.1799100754406]
Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate enhanced capabilities and reliability by reasoning more.
Despite various efforts to improve LLM reasoning, high-quality long-chain reasoning data and optimized training pipelines still remain inadequately explored in vision-language tasks.
We present Insight-V, an early effort to 1) scalably produce long and robust reasoning data for complex multi-modal tasks, and 2) an effective training pipeline to enhance the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T18:59:55Z) - FVEval: Understanding Language Model Capabilities in Formal Verification of Digital Hardware [4.480157114854711]
We present FVEval, the first comprehensive benchmark for characterizing large language models (LLMs) performance in tasks pertaining to formal verification (FV)
The benchmark consists of three sub-tasks that measure LLM capabilities at different levels.
We present both collections of expert-written verification collateral and methodologies to scalably generate synthetic examples aligned with FV.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T21:48:57Z) - Deconfounded Causality-aware Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Problem-Solving Improvement of LLMs [12.48241058167222]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in tackling various tasks based on human instructions.
But studies reveal that they often struggle with tasks requiring reasoning, such as math or physics limitation.
This raises questions about whether LLMs truly comprehend embedded knowledge or merely learn to replicate the token distribution without a true understanding of the content.
We propose Decon Causal Adaptation (DCA), a novel parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) method to enhance the model's reasoning capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-04T13:17:09Z) - Critic-CoT: Boosting the reasoning abilities of large language model via Chain-of-thoughts Critic [48.94340387130627]
Critic-CoT is a framework that pushes LLMs toward System-2-like critic capability.
CoT reasoning paradigm and the automatic construction of distant-supervision data without human annotation.
Experiments on GSM8K and MATH demonstrate that our enhanced model significantly boosts task-solving performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-29T08:02:09Z) - Improving Retrieval Augmented Language Model with Self-Reasoning [20.715106330314605]
We propose a novel self-reasoning framework aimed at improving the reliability and traceability of RALMs.
The framework involves constructing self-reason trajectories with three processes: a relevance-aware process, an evidence-aware selective process, and a trajectory analysis process.
We have evaluated our framework across four public datasets to demonstrate the superiority of our method.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T09:05:10Z) - Prism: A Framework for Decoupling and Assessing the Capabilities of VLMs [83.24033574914425]
We present Prism, an innovative framework designed to disentangle the perception and reasoning processes involved in visual question solving.
Prism comprises two distinct stages: a perception stage that utilizes a VLM to extract and articulate visual information in textual form, and a reasoning stage that formulates responses based on the extracted visual information.
Our analytical framework provides several valuable insights, underscoring Prism's potential as a cost-effective solution for vision-language tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T17:54:03Z) - Fine-Tuning Large Vision-Language Models as Decision-Making Agents via Reinforcement Learning [79.38140606606126]
We propose an algorithmic framework that fine-tunes vision-language models (VLMs) with reinforcement learning (RL)
Our framework provides a task description and then prompts the VLM to generate chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning.
We demonstrate that our proposed framework enhances the decision-making capabilities of VLM agents across various tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-16T17:50:19Z) - Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A
Study on Demonstration Uncertainty [52.72790059506241]
Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text.
Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-07T01:35:24Z) - Post Hoc Explanations of Language Models Can Improve Language Models [43.2109029463221]
We present a novel framework, Amplifying Model Performance by Leveraging In-Context Learning with Post Hoc Explanations (AMPLIFY)
We leverage post hoc explanation methods which output attribution scores (explanations) capturing the influence of each of the input features on model predictions.
Our framework, AMPLIFY, leads to prediction accuracy improvements of about 10-25% over a wide range of tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-19T04:46:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.