STORI: A Benchmark and Taxonomy for Stochastic Environments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.01793v2
- Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2025 06:53:07 GMT
- Title: STORI: A Benchmark and Taxonomy for Stochastic Environments
- Authors: Aryan Amit Barsainyan, Jing Yu Lim, Dianbo Liu,
- Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning (RL) techniques have achieved impressive performance on simulated benchmarks such as Atari100k.<n>A central obstacle is environmentality, as real systems involve noisy observations, unpredictable dynamics, and non-stationary conditions.<n>We propose a comprehensive five-type taxonomy of environmentality and demonstrate systematic vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art model-based RL algorithms.
- Score: 2.8825582215429186
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) techniques have achieved impressive performance on simulated benchmarks such as Atari100k, yet recent advances remain largely confined to simulation and show limited transfer to real-world domains. A central obstacle is environmental stochasticity, as real systems involve noisy observations, unpredictable dynamics, and non-stationary conditions that undermine the stability of current methods. Existing benchmarks rarely capture these uncertainties and favor simplified settings where algorithms can be tuned to succeed. The absence of a well-defined taxonomy of stochasticity further complicates evaluation, as robustness to one type of stochastic perturbation, such as sticky actions, does not guarantee robustness to other forms of uncertainty. To address this critical gap, we introduce STORI (STOchastic-ataRI), a benchmark that systematically incorporates diverse stochastic effects and enables rigorous evaluation of RL techniques under different forms of uncertainty. We propose a comprehensive five-type taxonomy of environmental stochasticity and demonstrate systematic vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art model-based RL algorithms through targeted evaluation of DreamerV3 and STORM. Our findings reveal that world models dramatically underestimate environmental variance, struggle with action corruption, and exhibit unreliable dynamics under partial observability. We release the code and benchmark publicly at https://github.com/ARY2260/stori, providing a unified framework for developing more robust RL systems.
Related papers
- GTS: Inference-Time Scaling of Latent Reasoning with a Learnable Gaussian Thought Sampler [54.10960908347221]
We model latent thought exploration as conditional sampling from learnable densities and instantiate this idea as a Gaussian Thought Sampler (GTS)<n>GTS predicts context-dependent perturbation distributions over continuous reasoning states and is trained with GRPO-style policy optimization while keeping the backbone frozen.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-15T09:57:47Z) - AgentNoiseBench: Benchmarking Robustness of Tool-Using LLM Agents Under Noisy Condition [72.24180896265192]
We introduce AgentNoiseBench, a framework for evaluating robustness of agentic models under noisy environments.<n>We first conduct an in-depth analysis of biases and uncertainties in real-world scenarios.<n>We then categorize environmental noise into two primary types: user-noise and tool-noise.<n>Building on this analysis, we develop an automated pipeline that injects controllable noise into existing agent-centric benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-11T20:33:10Z) - Not All Preferences Are Created Equal: Stability-Aware and Gradient-Efficient Alignment for Reasoning Models [52.48582333951919]
We propose a dynamic framework designed to enhance alignment reliability by maximizing the Signal-to-Noise Ratio of policy updates.<n>SAGE (Stability-Aware Gradient Efficiency) integrates a coarse-grained curriculum mechanism that refreshes candidate pools based on model competence.<n> Experiments on multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that SAGE significantly accelerates convergence and outperforms static baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-01T12:56:10Z) - Balance Equation-based Distributionally Robust Offline Imitation Learning [8.607736795429638]
Imitation Learning (IL) has proven highly effective for robotic and control tasks where manually designing reward functions or explicit controllers is infeasible.<n>Standard IL methods implicitly assume that the environment dynamics remain fixed between training and deployment.<n>We address this challenge through Balance Equation-based Distributionally Robust Offline Learning.<n>We formulate the problem as a distributionally robust optimization over an uncertainty set of transition models, seeking a policy that minimizes the imitation loss under the worst-case transition distribution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-11T07:48:09Z) - Uncalibrated Reasoning: GRPO Induces Overconfidence for Stochastic Outcomes [55.2480439325792]
Reinforcement learning (RL) has proven remarkably effective at improving the accuracy of language models in verifiable and deterministic domains like mathematics.<n>Here, we examine if current RL methods are also effective at optimizing language models in verifiable domains with outcomes, like scientific experiments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-15T20:50:53Z) - Online Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning under Model Uncertainties [10.054572105379425]
Well-trained multi-agent systems can fail when deployed in real-world environments.<n>DRMGs enhance system resilience by optimizing for worst-case performance over a defined set of environmental uncertainties.<n>This paper pioneers the study of online learning in DRMGs, where agents learn directly from environmental interactions without prior data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-04T23:14:32Z) - RoHOI: Robustness Benchmark for Human-Object Interaction Detection [84.78366452133514]
Human-Object Interaction (HOI) detection is crucial for robot-human assistance, enabling context-aware support.<n>We introduce the first benchmark for HOI detection, evaluating model resilience under diverse challenges.<n>Our benchmark, RoHOI, includes 20 corruption types based on the HICO-DET and V-COCO datasets and a new robustness-focused metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-12T01:58:04Z) - Testing Generalizability in Causal Inference [3.547529079746247]
No formal procedure exists for statistically evaluating generalizability in machine learning algorithms.<n>We propose a systematic framework for statistically evaluating the generalizability of high-dimensional causal inference models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-05T11:44:00Z) - Model-Based Reward Shaping for Adversarial Inverse Reinforcement Learning in Stochastic Environments [11.088387316161064]
We tackle the limitation of the Adrial Inverse Reinforcement Learning (AIRL) method in environments where theoretical results cannot hold and performance is degraded.
We propose a novel method which infuses the dynamics information into the reward shaping with the theoretical guarantee for the induced optimal policy in the environments.
We present a novel Model-Enhanced AIRL framework, which integrates transition model estimation directly into reward shaping.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T18:27:37Z) - SAMBO-RL: Shifts-aware Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning [9.88109749688605]
Model-based offline reinforcement learning trains policies using pre-collected datasets and learned environment models.<n>This paper offers a comprehensive analysis that disentangles the problem into two fundamental components: model bias and policy shift.<n>We introduce Shifts-aware Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning (SAMBO-RL), a practical framework that efficiently trains classifiers to approximate SAR for policy optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-23T04:25:09Z) - Time-Constrained Robust MDPs [28.641743425443]
We introduce a new time-constrained robust MDP (TC-RMDP) formulation that considers multifactorial, correlated, and time-dependent disturbances.
This study revisits the prevailing assumptions in robust RL and opens new avenues for developing more practical and realistic RL applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-12T16:45:09Z) - SURE: SUrvey REcipes for building reliable and robust deep networks [12.268921703825258]
In this paper, we revisit techniques for uncertainty estimation within deep neural networks and consolidate a suite of techniques to enhance their reliability.
We rigorously evaluate SURE against the benchmark of failure prediction, a critical testbed for uncertainty estimation efficacy.
When applied to real-world challenges, such as data corruption, label noise, and long-tailed class distribution, SURE exhibits remarkable robustness, delivering results that are superior or on par with current state-of-the-art specialized methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-01T13:58:19Z) - When Demonstrations Meet Generative World Models: A Maximum Likelihood
Framework for Offline Inverse Reinforcement Learning [62.00672284480755]
This paper aims to recover the structure of rewards and environment dynamics that underlie observed actions in a fixed, finite set of demonstrations from an expert agent.
Accurate models of expertise in executing a task has applications in safety-sensitive applications such as clinical decision making and autonomous driving.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-15T04:14:20Z) - Single-Trajectory Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning [21.955807398493334]
We propose Distributionally Robust RL (DRRL) to enhance performance across a range of environments.
Existing DRRL algorithms are either model-based or fail to learn from a single sample trajectory.
We design a first fully model-free DRRL algorithm, called distributionally robust Q-learning with single trajectory (DRQ)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-27T14:08:09Z) - Statistical Safety and Robustness Guarantees for Feedback Motion
Planning of Unknown Underactuated Stochastic Systems [1.0323063834827415]
We propose a sampling-based planner that uses the mean dynamics model and simultaneously bounds the closed-loop tracking error via a learned disturbance bound.
We validate that our guarantees translate to empirical safety in simulation on a 10D quadrotor, and in the real world on a physical CrazyFlie quadrotor and Clearpath Jackal robot.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-13T19:38:39Z) - Posterior Coreset Construction with Kernelized Stein Discrepancy for
Model-Based Reinforcement Learning [78.30395044401321]
We develop a novel model-based approach to reinforcement learning (MBRL)
It relaxes the assumptions on the target transition model to belong to a generic family of mixture models.
It can achieve up-to 50 percent reduction in wall clock time in some continuous control environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-02T17:27:49Z) - Efficient Model-based Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Optimistic
Equilibrium Computation [93.52573037053449]
H-MARL (Hallucinated Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning) learns successful equilibrium policies after a few interactions with the environment.
We demonstrate our approach experimentally on an autonomous driving simulation benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T17:24:03Z) - Probabilistic robust linear quadratic regulators with Gaussian processes [73.0364959221845]
Probabilistic models such as Gaussian processes (GPs) are powerful tools to learn unknown dynamical systems from data for subsequent use in control design.
We present a novel controller synthesis for linearized GP dynamics that yields robust controllers with respect to a probabilistic stability margin.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-17T08:36:18Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.