Unlearning That Lasts: Utility-Preserving, Robust, and Almost Irreversible Forgetting in LLMs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02820v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2025 20:38:53 GMT
• Title: Unlearning That Lasts: Utility-Preserving, Robust, and Almost Irreversible Forgetting in LLMs
• Authors: Naman Deep Singh, Maximilian Müller, Francesco Croce, Matthias Hein,
• Abstract summary: Unlearning in large language models (LLMs) involves precisely removing specific information from a pre-trained model.<n>This is crucial to ensure safety of LLMs by deleting private data or harmful knowledge acquired during pre-training.<n>We introduce JensUn, where we leverage the Jensen-Shannon Divergence as the training objective for both forget and retain sets.<n>In extensive experiments, JensUn achieves better forget-utility trade-off than competing methods, and even demonstrates strong resilience to benign relearning.
• Score: 31.768387661474904
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Unlearning in large language models (LLMs) involves precisely removing specific information from a pre-trained model. This is crucial to ensure safety of LLMs by deleting private data or harmful knowledge acquired during pre-training. However, existing unlearning methods often fall short when subjected to thorough evaluation. To overcome this, we introduce JensUn, where we leverage the Jensen-Shannon Divergence as the training objective for both forget and retain sets for more stable and effective unlearning dynamics compared to commonly used loss functions. In extensive experiments, JensUn achieves better forget-utility trade-off than competing methods, and even demonstrates strong resilience to benign relearning. Additionally, for a precise unlearning evaluation, we introduce LKF, a curated dataset of lesser-known facts that provides a realistic unlearning scenario. Finally, to comprehensively test unlearning methods, we propose (i) employing an LLM as semantic judge instead of the standard ROUGE score, and (ii) using worst-case unlearning evaluation over various paraphrases and input formats. Our improved evaluation framework reveals that many existing methods are less effective than previously thought.

Related papers

• LLM Unlearning on Noisy Forget Sets: A Study of Incomplete, Rewritten, and Watermarked Data [69.5099112089508]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable generative capabilities but raise ethical and security concerns by memorizing sensitive data.<n>This work presents the first study of unlearning under perturbed or low-fidelity forget data, referred to as noisy forget sets.<n>We find that unlearning remains surprisingly robust to perturbations, provided that core semantic signals are preserved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T05:10:49Z)
• PULSE: Practical Evaluation Scenarios for Large Multimodal Model Unlearning [31.156889683949803]
  We introduce PULSE protocol for realistic unlearning scenarios for LMMs.<n>We then evaluate existing unlearning methods along these dimensions.<n>Our results reveal that, although some techniques can successfully unlearn knowledge acquired through fine-tuning, they struggle to eliminate information learned during pre-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T01:13:08Z)
• OpenUnlearning: Accelerating LLM Unlearning via Unified Benchmarking of Methods and Metrics [82.0813150432867]
  We introduce OpenUnlearning, a standardized framework for benchmarking large language models (LLMs) unlearning methods and metrics.<n>OpenUnlearning integrates 13 unlearning algorithms and 16 diverse evaluations across 3 leading benchmarks.<n>We also benchmark diverse unlearning methods and provide a comparative analysis against an extensive evaluation suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T20:16:37Z)
• BLUR: A Benchmark for LLM Unlearning Robust to Forget-Retain Overlap [18.68387394444096]
  Machine unlearning has the potential to improve the safety of large language models (LLMs) by removing sensitive or harmful information post hoc.<n>A key challenge in unlearning involves balancing between forget quality (effectively unlearning undesirable information) and retain quality (maintaining good performance on other, general tasks)<n>We present $textttBLUR$: a benchmark for LLM unlearning that provides more realistic scenarios of forget-retain overlap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T22:09:04Z)
• UniErase: Towards Balanced and Precise Unlearning in Language Models [69.04923022755547]
  Large language models (LLMs) require iterative updates to address the outdated information problem.<n>UniErase is a novel unlearning framework that demonstrates precision and balanced performances between knowledge unlearning and ability retaining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-21T15:53:28Z)
• Erasing Without Remembering: Implicit Knowledge Forgetting in Large Language Models [70.78205685001168]
  We investigate knowledge forgetting in large language models with a focus on its generalisation.<n> UGBench is the first benchmark specifically designed to assess the unlearning of in-scope implicit knowledge.<n>We propose PerMU, a novel probability-based unlearning paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T11:03:33Z)
• ReLearn: Unlearning via Learning for Large Language Models [64.2802606302194]
  We propose ReLearn, a data augmentation and fine-tuning pipeline for effective unlearning.<n>This framework introduces Knowledge Forgetting Rate (KFR) and Knowledge Retention Rate (KRR) to measure knowledge-level preservation.<n>Our experiments show that ReLearn successfully achieves targeted forgetting while preserving high-quality output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T16:31:00Z)
• Does Unlearning Truly Unlearn? A Black Box Evaluation of LLM Unlearning Methods [1.9799527196428242]
  Large language model unlearning aims to remove harmful information that LLMs have learnt to prevent their use for malicious purposes.<n>We show that unlearning has a notable impact on general model capabilities.<n>We show that doing 5-shot prompting or rephrasing the question in simple ways can lead to an over ten-fold increase in accuracy on unlearning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T22:31:17Z)
• Position: LLM Unlearning Benchmarks are Weak Measures of Progress [31.957968729934745]
  We find that existing benchmarks provide an overly optimistic and potentially misleading view on the effectiveness of candidate unlearning methods.<n>We identify that existing benchmarks are particularly vulnerable to modifications that introduce even loose dependencies between the forget and retain information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T18:07:25Z)
• Learn while Unlearn: An Iterative Unlearning Framework for Generative Language Models [52.40798352740857]
  We introduce the Iterative Contrastive Unlearning (ICU) framework, which consists of three core components.<n>A Knowledge Unlearning Induction module targets specific knowledge for removal using an unlearning loss.<n>A Contrastive Learning Enhancement module preserves the model's expressive capabilities against the pure unlearning goal.<n>An Iterative Unlearning Refinement module dynamically adjusts the unlearning process through ongoing evaluation and updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T07:09:35Z)
• Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning Methods [97.2995389188179]
  This paper seeks to refine the evaluation of machine unlearning for large language models.<n>It addresses two key challenges -- the robustness of evaluation metrics and the trade-offs between competing goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.