KubeGuard: LLM-Assisted Kubernetes Hardening via Configuration Files and Runtime Logs Analysis
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.04191v1
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 13:13:57 GMT
- Title: KubeGuard: LLM-Assisted Kubernetes Hardening via Configuration Files and Runtime Logs Analysis
- Abstract summary: KubeGuard is a novel runtime log-driven recommender framework for cluster security.<n>It is designed to harden K8s environments through two complementary tasks: Resource Creation and Resource Refinement.<n>Our evaluation demonstrates that KubeGuard effectively generates and refines K8s manifests for Roles, NetworkPolicies, and Deployments.
- Score: 21.638320707123444
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The widespread adoption of Kubernetes (K8s) for orchestrating cloud-native applications has introduced significant security challenges, such as misconfigured resources and overly permissive configurations. Failing to address these issues can result in unauthorized access, privilege escalation, and lateral movement within clusters. Most existing K8s security solutions focus on detecting misconfigurations, typically through static analysis or anomaly detection. In contrast, this paper presents KubeGuard, a novel runtime log-driven recommender framework aimed at mitigating risks by addressing overly permissive configurations. KubeGuard is designed to harden K8s environments through two complementary tasks: Resource Creation and Resource Refinement. It leverages large language models (LLMs) to analyze manifests and runtime logs reflecting actual system behavior, using modular prompt-chaining workflows. This approach enables KubeGuard to create least-privilege configurations for new resources and refine existing manifests to reduce the attack surface. KubeGuard's output manifests are presented as recommendations that users (e.g., developers and operators) can review and adopt to enhance cluster security. Our evaluation demonstrates that KubeGuard effectively generates and refines K8s manifests for Roles, NetworkPolicies, and Deployments, leveraging both proprietary and open-source LLMs. The high precision, recall, and F1-scores affirm KubeGuard's practicality as a framework that translates runtime observability into actionable, least-privilege configuration guidance.
Related papers
- HazardAuditor: From Executable Threats to Safer Computer-Use Agents [50.06351661912873]
Existing guard models target static prompts and responses.<n>Existing safety platforms produce evaluation verdicts rather than the normalized supervision a guard model needs to learn.<n>We introduce HazardAuditor, an execution-grounded framework that closes both gaps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-09-14T07:09:33Z) - KubeCap: A Framework for Capability Minimization in Kubernetes via Static Analysis and LLM-Assisted Rule Inference [11.250679084544062]
Developers rely on default settings or coarse-grained security contexts in practice, violating the principle of least privilege.<n> Existing studies either detect vulnerable patterns in manifests or infer required capabilities for standalone Linux programs.<n>We propose KubeCap, a framework for capability minimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-27T06:55:24Z) - LMSM: LLM Security Framework Inspired by Linux Security Modules [56.93644694627783]
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed with layered defenses, yet malicious prompts can still bypass them.<n>We present Language Model Security Modules (LMSM), a security framework that adapts the separation behind Linux Security Modules (LSM) to LLM serving.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-26T12:13:05Z) - Understanding and Mitigating Prompt Leaking Attacks in Real-World LLM-Based Applications [57.33208520608409]
This paper presents a systematic study of prompt leaking in large language model (LLM)-based applications.<n>We find that over 80% of deployments leak system prompts under realistic adversarial queries.<n>We propose AREA, a practical defense that re-anchors the model's attention using an optimizable soft prompt.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-06-17T04:20:00Z) - Jailbreaking Leaves a Trace: Understanding and Detecting Jailbreak Attacks from Internal Representations of Large Language Models [2.6140509675507384]
We study jailbreaking from both security and interpretability perspectives.<n>We propose a tensor-based latent representation framework that captures structure in hidden activations.<n>Our results provide evidence that jailbreak behavior is rooted in identifiable internal structures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-12T02:43:17Z) - Why Does the LLM Stop Computing: An Empirical Study of User-Reported Failures in Open-Source LLMs [50.075587392477935]
We conduct the first large-scale empirical study of 705 real-world failures from the open-source DeepSeek, Llama, and Qwen ecosystems.<n>Our analysis reveals a paradigm shift: white-box orchestration relocates the reliability bottleneck from model algorithmic defects to the systemic fragility of the deployment stack.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-20T06:42:56Z) - ReasAlign: Reasoning Enhanced Safety Alignment against Prompt Injection Attack [52.17935054046577]
We present ReasAlign, a model-level solution to improve safety alignment against indirect prompt injection attacks.<n>ReasAlign incorporates structured reasoning steps to analyze user queries, detect conflicting instructions, and preserve the continuity of the user's intended tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-15T08:23:38Z) - CaMeLs Can Use Computers Too: System-level Security for Computer Use Agents [60.98294016925157]
AI agents are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, where malicious content hijacks agent behavior to steal credentials or cause financial loss.<n>We introduce Single-Shot Planning for CUAs, where a trusted planner generates a complete execution graph with conditional branches before any observation of potentially malicious content.<n>Although this architectural isolation successfully prevents instruction injections, we show that additional measures are needed to prevent Branch Steering attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-14T23:06:35Z) - The Trojan Knowledge: Bypassing Commercial LLM Guardrails via Harmless Prompt Weaving and Adaptive Tree Search [58.8834056209347]
Large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass safety guardrails to elicit harmful outputs.<n>We introduce the Correlated Knowledge Attack Agent (CKA-Agent), a dynamic framework that reframes jailbreaking as an adaptive, tree-structured exploration of the target model's knowledge base.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-01T07:05:23Z) - FHE-Agent: Automating CKKS Configuration for Practical Encrypted Inference via an LLM-Guided Agentic Framework [23.668677510478446]
We present FHE-Agent, an agentic framework that automates the expert reasoning process.<n>It decomposes the search into global parameter selection and layer-wise bottleneck repair.<n>It consistently achieves better precision and lower latency than nave search strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-23T23:26:21Z) - DiffuGuard: How Intrinsic Safety is Lost and Found in Diffusion Large Language Models [50.21378052667732]
We conduct an in-depth analysis of dLLM vulnerabilities to jailbreak attacks across two distinct dimensions: intra-step and inter-step dynamics.<n>We propose DiffuGuard, a training-free defense framework that addresses vulnerabilities through a dual-stage approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-29T05:17:10Z) - AdaptiveGuard: Towards Adaptive Runtime Safety for LLM-Powered Software [11.606665113249298]
Guardrails are critical for the safe deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs)-powered software.<n>We propose AdaptiveGuard, an adaptive guardrail that detects novel jailbreak attacks as out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs.<n>We show that AdaptiveGuard achieves 96% OOD detection accuracy, adapts to new attacks in just two update steps, and retains over 85% F1-score on in-distribution data post-adaptation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-21T01:22:42Z) - DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM Agents [52.92354372596197]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly central to agentic systems due to their strong reasoning and planning capabilities.<n>This interaction also introduces the risk of prompt injection attacks, where malicious inputs from external sources can mislead the agent's behavior.<n>We propose a Dynamic Rule-based Isolation Framework for Trustworthy agentic systems, which enforces both control and data-level constraints.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-13T05:01:09Z) - Exploiting Inaccurate Branch History in Side-Channel Attacks [54.218160467764086]
This paper examines how resource sharing and contention affect two widely implemented but underdocumented features: Bias-Free Branch Prediction and Branch History Speculation.<n>We show that these features can inadvertently modify the Branch History Buffer (BHB) update behavior and create new primitives that trigger malicious mis-speculations.<n>We present three novel attack primitives: two Spectre attacks, namely Spectre-BSE and Spectre-BHS, and a cross-privilege control flow side-channel attack called BiasScope.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-08T19:46:43Z) - CoP: Agentic Red-teaming for Large Language Models using Composition of Principles [61.404771120828244]
This paper proposes an agentic workflow to automate and scale the red-teaming process of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Human users provide a set of red-teaming principles as instructions to an AI agent to automatically orchestrate effective red-teaming strategies and generate jailbreak prompts.<n>When tested against leading LLMs, CoP reveals unprecedented safety risks by finding novel jailbreak prompts and improving the best-known single-turn attack success rate by up to 19.0 times.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-01T02:18:41Z) - CoTGuard: Using Chain-of-Thought Triggering for Copyright Protection in Multi-Agent LLM Systems [55.57181090183713]
We introduce CoTGuard, a novel framework for copyright protection that leverages trigger-based detection within Chain-of-Thought reasoning.<n>Specifically, we can activate specific CoT segments and monitor intermediate reasoning steps for unauthorized content reproduction by embedding specific trigger queries into agent prompts.<n>This approach enables fine-grained, interpretable detection of copyright violations in collaborative agent scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T01:42:37Z) - KubeFence: Security Hardening of the Kubernetes Attack Surface [3.67004863266419]
K8s is widely used to orchestrate containerized applications, including critical services in domains such as finance, healthcare, and government.<n>Its extensive and feature-rich API interface exposes a broad attack surface, making K8s vulnerable to exploits of software vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.<n>This paper proposes a novel solution, KubeFence, which implements finer-grain API filtering tailored to specific client workloads.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-15T12:15:34Z) - STShield: Single-Token Sentinel for Real-Time Jailbreak Detection in Large Language Models [31.35788474507371]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become increasingly vulnerable to jailbreak attacks.<n>We present STShield, a lightweight framework for real-time jailbroken judgement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-23T04:23:07Z) - Comparative Analysis of Lightweight Kubernetes Distributions for Edge Computing: Security, Resilience and Maintainability [0.0]
This study compares and analyzes the lightweight distributions k3s, k0s, KubeEdge, and OpenYurt.<n>Results indicate that while k3s and k0s offer superior ease of development due to their simplicity, they have lower security compliance compared to, KubeEdge, and OpenYurt.<n>Findings highlight trade-offs between performance, security, resiliency, and maintainability, offering insights for practitioners deploying in edge environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T20:05:40Z) - LLMSecConfig: An LLM-Based Approach for Fixing Software Container Misconfigurations [0.716879432974126]
Security misconfigurations in Container Orchestrators pose serious threats to software systems.<n>The industry currently lacks automated solutions capable of fixing these misconfigurations.<n>This study introduces LLMSecConfig, an innovative framework that bridges this gap by combining SATs with LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-04T04:56:34Z) - LeakAgent: RL-based Red-teaming Agent for LLM Privacy Leakage [78.33839735526769]
LeakAgent is a novel black-box red-teaming framework for privacy leakage.<n>Our framework trains an open-source LLM through reinforcement learning as the attack agent to generate adversarial prompts.<n>We show that LeakAgent significantly outperforms existing rule-based approaches in training data extraction and automated methods in system prompt leakage.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-07T20:09:01Z) - Centralized Defense: Logging and Mitigation of Kubernetes Misconfigurations with Open Source Tools [9.377368885342241]
This paper presents a detailed analysis of misconfigurations in environments and their significant impact on system reliability and security.
A centralized logging solution was developed to detect such misconfigurations, detailing the integration process with a cluster and the implementation of role-based access control.
The effectiveness of the solution was evaluated using specific metrics, such as the total cycle time for running the central logging solution against the individual open source tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-07T12:02:13Z) - Jailbreaking as a Reward Misspecification Problem [80.52431374743998]
We propose a novel perspective that attributes this vulnerability to reward misspecification during the alignment process.<n>We introduce a metric ReGap to quantify the extent of reward misspecification and demonstrate its effectiveness.<n>We present ReMiss, a system for automated red teaming that generates adversarial prompts in a reward-misspecified space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T15:12:27Z) - Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities.<n>Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content.<n>We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.