Mitigating Spurious Correlations Between Question and Answer via Chain-of-Thought Correctness Perception Distillation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05602v2
• Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 07:15:51 GMT
• Title: Mitigating Spurious Correlations Between Question and Answer via Chain-of-Thought Correctness Perception Distillation
• Authors: Hongyan Xie, Yitong Yao, Yikun Ban, Zixuan Huang, Deqing Wang, Zhenhe Wu, Haoxiang Su, Chao Wang, Shuangyong Song,
• Abstract summary: Chain-of-Thought Correctness Perception Distillation (CoPeD) aims to improve the reasoning quality of the student model.<n>CoPeD encourages the student model to predict answers based on correct rationales and revise them when they are incorrect.
• Score: 25.195244084313114
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) excel at reasoning tasks but are expensive to deploy. Thus small language models (SLMs) are fine-tuned on CoT data generated by LLMs to copy LLMs' abilities. However, these CoT data may include noisy rationales that either fail to substantiate the answers or contribute no additional information to support answer prediction, which leads SLMs to capture spurious correlations between questions and answers and compromise the quality of reasoning. In this work, we propose Chain-of-Thought Correctness Perception Distillation (CoPeD), which aims to improve the reasoning quality of the student model from the perspectives of task setting and data utilization. Firstly, we introduce a correctness-aware task setting that encourages the student model to predict answers based on correct rationales and revise them when they are incorrect. This setting improves the faithfulness of reasoning and allows the model to learn from its mistakes. Then, we propose a Correctness-Aware Weighted loss, which dynamically adjusts the contribution of each training instance based on the combined loss of the rationale and the answer. This strategy encourages the model to focus more on samples where the rationale offers stronger support for the correct answer. Experiments have shown that CoPeD is effective on both in-distribution (IND) and out-of-distribution (OOD) benchmark reasoning datasets.

Related papers

• Shape of Thought: When Distribution Matters More than Correctness in Reasoning Tasks [24.55929874173401]
  We show that a language model's reasoning capabilities can be improved by training on datasets of chain-of-thought traces from more capable models.<n>Experiments show this approach can yield better performance on reasoning tasks than training on human-annotated datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T07:35:55Z)
• Decomposition-Enhanced Training for Post-Hoc Attributions In Language Models [64.49342399229529]
  We argue that post-hoc attribution can be reframed as a reasoning problem, where answers are decomposed into constituent units, each tied to specific context.<n>We introduce DecompTune, a post-training method that teaches models to produce answer decompositions as intermediate reasoning steps.<n>Across extensive experiments and ablations, DecompTune substantially improves attribution quality, outperforming prior methods and matching or exceeding state-of-the-art frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T17:58:59Z)
• From <Answer> to <Think>: Multidimensional Supervision of Reasoning Process for LLM Optimization [62.07990937720985]
  Dimension-level Reward Model (DRM) is a new supervision framework for Large Language Models.<n>DRM evaluates the quality of a reasoning process along three fundamental, complementary, and interpretable dimensions.<n> Experimental results show that DRM provides effective supervision signals, guides the optimization of LLMs and enhances their reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T14:29:15Z)
• Answer-Consistent Chain-of-thought Reinforcement Learning For Multi-modal Large Langauge Models [33.398631680508814]
  We propose Answer-Consistent Reinforcement Learning that modifies the GRPO algorithm with an auxiliary consistency check.<n>We design a consistency-verification reward that grants a high reward only if both the original and the post-shuffle answers agree and are correct.<n>We evaluate ACRE on challenging Video Reasoning benchmarks and multimodal math reasoning benchmarks, achieving an average 2.2% and 1.5% improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T08:32:52Z)
• Boosting Process-Correct CoT Reasoning by Modeling Solvability of Multiple-Choice QA [10.122669382758122]
  We show that when questions are effectively unsolvable for a model, spurious chains of thought (CoTs) are more likely to appear.<n>We adapt outcome-supervised reward models and reinforcement learning with group-relative advantage to incorporate solvability into their objectives.<n>Our results highlight solvability as a key factor for reducing hallucinations and increasing reliability in CoT reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T08:34:16Z)
• Is Chain-of-Thought Reasoning of LLMs a Mirage? A Data Distribution Lens [23.326813303795692]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has been shown to improve Large Language Model (LLM) performance on various tasks.<n>However, some initial findings suggest that CoT reasoning may be more superficial than it appears.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T04:37:28Z)
• From Answers to Rationales: Self-Aligning Multimodal Reasoning with Answer-Oriented Chain-of-Thought [43.07899102255169]
  Current methods primarily focus on positive rationales, typically relying on manual annotations or complex systems.<n>We propose a novel framework: textbfSelf-Aligning textbfMultimodal Reasoning with textbfAnswertextbfriented Chain-of-textbfThought.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T08:24:51Z)
• TACO: Think-Answer Consistency for Optimized Long-Chain Reasoning and Efficient Data Learning via Reinforcement Learning in LVLMs [50.820065021136024]
  DeepSeek R1 has significantly advanced complex reasoning for large language models (LLMs)<n>Recent methods have attempted to replicate R1's reasoning capabilities in multimodal settings.<n>We propose TACO, a novel reinforcement learning algorithm for visual reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T06:30:48Z)
• S$^2$R: Teaching LLMs to Self-verify and Self-correct via Reinforcement Learning [51.84977135926156]
  We introduce S$2$R, an efficient framework that enhances LLM reasoning by teaching models to self-verify and self-correct during inference.<n>Our results demonstrate that Qwen2.5-math-7B achieves an accuracy improvement from 51.0% to 81.6%, outperforming models trained on an equivalent amount of long-CoT distilled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T13:40:22Z)
• Improve Vision Language Model Chain-of-thought Reasoning [86.83335752119741]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in vision language models (VLMs) is crucial for improving interpretability and trustworthiness. We show that training VLM on short answers does not generalize well to reasoning tasks that require more detailed responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T17:00:06Z)
• Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification [52.095460362197336]
  Large language models (LLMs) struggle with consistent and accurate reasoning. LLMs are trained primarily on correct solutions, reducing their ability to detect and learn from errors. We propose a novel collaborative method integrating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Program-of-Thought (PoT) solutions for verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T05:21:48Z)
• SCOTT: Self-Consistent Chain-of-Thought Distillation [68.40232422158569]
  Large language models (LMs) generate free-text rationales for their predictions via chain-of-thought prompting. We propose a faithful knowledge distillation method to learn a small, self-consistent CoT model from a teacher model that is orders of magnitude larger. To ensure faithful distillation, we use the teacher-generated rationales to learn a student LM with a counterfactual reasoning objective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T03:47:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.