Stack Overflow Is Not Dead Yet: Crowd Answers Still Matter

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05879v1
• Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2025 00:43:38 GMT
• Title: Stack Overflow Is Not Dead Yet: Crowd Answers Still Matter
• Authors: Denis Helic, Tiago Santos,
• Abstract summary: ChatGPT was introduced on Stack Overflow in November 2022.<n>This paper estimates the effect of ChatGPT on the length and difficulty of user questions and code examples.<n>Our results suggest that ChatGPT has effectively raised the bar for questions on Stack Overflow.
• Score: 0.9990687944474739
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Millions of users visit Stack Overflow regularly to ask community for answers to their programming questions. However, like many other platforms, Stack Overflow consistently struggles with low user retention and declining levels of user contributions to the platform. With the introduction of ChatGPT in November 2022, these ongoing difficulties on Stack Overflow were further magnified, as many users moved toward ChatGPT for programming help. In this paper, we build upon recent research on this phenomenon by analyzing the transformation of user-generated content on Stack Overflow during the post-ChatGPT period. Specifically, we analyze two years of Stack Overflow data and fit multiple causal regression models to estimate the effect of ChatGPT on the length and difficulty of user questions and code examples. We confirm an acceleration of decline in user contributions but find that ChatGPT had a significant positive effect on question and answer length, code length, and question difficulty on Stack Overflow across programming languages. Our results suggest that ChatGPT has effectively raised the bar for questions on Stack Overflow, as users increasingly turn to crowdsourced platforms for help with more complex and challenging problems. With our work we contribute to the ongoing discussion on the impact of tools such as ChatGPT on help-seeking in programming and, more broadly, on collaborative knowledge creation. Our results provide actionable insights for platform operators to support information management and user retention in the aftermath of ChatGPT's launch.

Related papers

• SOGPTSpotter: Detecting ChatGPT-Generated Answers on Stack Overflow [11.522654103273242]
  Stack Overflow is a popular Q&A platform where users ask technical questions and receive answers from a community of experts.<n>There has been a significant increase in the number of answers generated by ChatGPT, which can lead to incorrect and unreliable information being posted on the site.<n>We introduce a novel approach, SOGPTSpotter, that employs Siamese Neural Networks, leveraging the BigBird model and the Triplet loss to detect ChatGPT-generated answers on Stack Overflow.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T03:47:36Z)
• An exploratory analysis of Community-based Question-Answering Platforms and GPT-3-driven Generative AI: Is it the end of online community-based learning? [0.6749750044497732]
  ChatGPT offers software engineers an interactive alternative to community question-answering platforms like Stack Overflow. We analyze 2564 Python and JavaScript questions from StackOverflow that were asked between January 2022 and December 2022. Our analysis indicates that ChatGPT's responses are 66% shorter and share 35% more words with the questions, showing a 25% increase in positive sentiment compared to human responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T02:17:30Z)
• Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Management [56.4403395100589]
  We explore ChatGPT's capabilities on 6 tasks involving the complete vulnerability management process with a large-scale dataset containing 70,346 samples. One notable example is ChatGPT's proficiency in tasks like generating titles for software bug reports. Our findings reveal the difficulties encountered by ChatGPT and shed light on promising future directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-11T11:01:13Z)
• Primacy Effect of ChatGPT [69.49920102917598]
  We study the primacy effect of ChatGPT: the tendency of selecting the labels at earlier positions as the answer. We hope that our experiments and analyses provide additional insights into building more reliable ChatGPT-based solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T00:37:28Z)
• Which is a better programming assistant? A comparative study between chatgpt and stack overflow [10.861651344753591]
  We compare the performance of Stack Overflow and ChatGPT in enhancing programmer productivity. Concerning code quality, ChatGPT outperforms Stack Overflow significantly in helping complete algorithmic and library-related tasks. We identify the reasons behind the two platforms' divergent performances in programming assistance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-26T11:25:18Z)
• Is Stack Overflow Obsolete? An Empirical Study of the Characteristics of ChatGPT Answers to Stack Overflow Questions [7.065853028825656]
  We conducted the first in-depth analysis of ChatGPT answers to programming questions on Stack Overflow. We examined the correctness, consistency, comprehensiveness, and conciseness of ChatGPT answers. Our analysis shows that 52% of ChatGPT answers contain incorrect information and 77% are verbose.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T13:23:20Z)
• Evaluating Privacy Questions From Stack Overflow: Can ChatGPT Compete? [1.231476564107544]
  ChatGPT has been used as an alternative to generate code or produce responses to developers' questions. Our results show that most privacy-related questions are related to choice/consent, aggregation, and identification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-19T21:33:04Z)
• ChatLog: Carefully Evaluating the Evolution of ChatGPT Across Time [54.18651663847874]
  ChatGPT has achieved great success and can be considered to have acquired an infrastructural status. Existing benchmarks encounter two challenges: (1) Disregard for periodical evaluation and (2) Lack of fine-grained features. We construct ChatLog, an ever-updating dataset with large-scale records of diverse long-form ChatGPT responses for 21 NLP benchmarks from March, 2023 to now.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T11:33:48Z)
• One Small Step for Generative AI, One Giant Leap for AGI: A Complete Survey on ChatGPT in AIGC Era [95.2284704286191]
  GPT-4 (a.k.a. ChatGPT plus) is one small step for generative AI (GAI) but one giant leap for artificial general intelligence (AGI) Since its official release in November 2022, ChatGPT has quickly attracted numerous users with extensive media coverage. This work is the first to survey ChatGPT with a comprehensive review of its underlying technology, applications, and challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T06:22:09Z)
• ChatGPT is a Knowledgeable but Inexperienced Solver: An Investigation of Commonsense Problem in Large Language Models [49.52083248451775]
  Large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in NLP. We specifically focus on ChatGPT, a widely used and easily accessible LLM. We conduct a series of experiments on 11 datasets to evaluate ChatGPT's commonsense abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T03:05:43Z)
• Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? [113.22611481694825]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to perform a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks zero-shot. Recently, the debut of ChatGPT has drawn a great deal of attention from the natural language processing (NLP) community. It is not yet known whether ChatGPT can serve as a generalist model that can perform many NLP tasks zero-shot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T09:44:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.