Social Dynamics of DAOs: Power, Onboarding, and Inclusivity
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06163v1
- Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2025 18:19:40 GMT
- Title: Social Dynamics of DAOs: Power, Onboarding, and Inclusivity
- Authors: Victoria Kozlova, Ben Biedermann,
- Abstract summary: This report explores the often-overlooked cultural and social dynamics shaping participation and power in the ecosystem.<n>It shows how factors such as financial privilege, informal gatekeeping, bias and structures create barriers to meaningful inclusion.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: This report explores the often-overlooked cultural and social dynamics shaping participation and power in DAOs. Drawing on qualitative interviews and ethnographic observations, it shows how factors such as financial privilege, informal gatekeeping, visibility bias, and onboarding structures create barriers to meaningful inclusion. While DAOs are frequently framed as permissionless and egalitarian, the lived experiences of contributors reveal a more complex reality, one in which soft power and implicit norms determine people's position within DAOs. Instead of offering solutionist prescriptions, this report argues for a deeper cultural reflection within the DAO ecosystem. It highlights that decentralisation is not solely a protocol-level feature, but an ongoing social process that requires intentional cultivation of trust, belonging, and epistemic plurality. With this report, we want to sharpen the collective awareness of structural blind spots and call for building more inclusive and culturally conscious decentralised systems.
Related papers
- From Bias Mitigation to Bias Negotiation: Governing Identity and Sociocultural Reasoning in Generative AI [0.0]
LLMs act in the social world by drawing upon shared cultural patterns to make social situations understandable and actionable.<n>Identity is often part of the inferential substrate of competent judgment.<n> dominant governance regime for identity-related harm remains bias mitigation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-05T21:20:10Z) - Infrastructuring Contestability: A Framework for Community-Defined AI Value Pluralism [0.0]
The proliferation of AI-driven systems presents a challenge to Human-Computer Interaction and Computer-Supported Cooperative Work.<n>Current approaches to value alignment, which rely on centralized, top-down definitions, lack the mechanisms for meaningful contestability.<n>This paper introduces Community-Defined AI Value Pluralism, a socio-technical framework that addresses this gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T16:45:50Z) - Governance and Technological Challenge in Digital Solidarity Economies: A Case Study of a Collaborative Transportation Platform in South Korea [1.9567015559455132]
South Korea's City P illustrates how lofty goals of digital solidarity can falter when challenged by local governance realities.<n>Findings reveal a marked disconnect between the initiative's stated emphasis on community co-ownership and the actual power dynamics that largely favored government agencies and external firms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-05T21:23:33Z) - Fair Deepfake Detectors Can Generalize [51.21167546843708]
We show that controlling for confounders (data distribution and model capacity) enables improved generalization via fairness interventions.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose Demographic Attribute-insensitive Intervention Detection (DAID), a plug-and-play framework composed of: i) Demographic-aware data rebalancing, which employs inverse-propensity weighting and subgroup-wise feature normalization to neutralize distributional biases; and ii) Demographic-agnostic feature aggregation, which uses a novel alignment loss to suppress sensitive-attribute signals.<n>DAID consistently achieves superior performance in both fairness and generalization compared to several state-of-the-art
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-03T14:10:02Z) - OpenReview Should be Protected and Leveraged as a Community Asset for Research in the Era of Large Language Models [55.21589313404023]
OpenReview is a continually evolving repository of research papers, peer reviews, author rebuttals, meta-reviews, and decision outcomes.<n>We highlight three promising areas in which OpenReview can uniquely contribute: enhancing the quality, scalability, and accountability of peer review processes; enabling meaningful, open-ended benchmarks rooted in genuine expert deliberation; and supporting alignment research through real-world interactions reflecting expert assessment, intentions, and scientific values.<n>We suggest the community collaboratively explore standardized benchmarks and usage guidelines around OpenReview, inviting broader dialogue on responsible data use, ethical considerations, and collective stewardship.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-24T09:07:13Z) - Are We There Yet? A Study of Decentralized Identity Applications [0.2840208039211775]
Decentralized Identities (DI) and Self-Sovereign Identities (SSI) have seen significant growth in recent years.<n>No existing surveys have thoroughly analyzed real-world deployments to understand the barriers to the widespread adoption of decentralized identity models.<n>This paper addresses the gap by exploring both academic and grey literature and examining commercial and governmental initiatives.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-20T09:05:16Z) - DAOs of Collective Intelligence? Unraveling the Complexity of Blockchain Governance in Decentralized Autonomous Organizations [0.7499722271664144]
Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) have transformed organizational structures by shifting from traditional control to decentralized approaches.<n>Despite managing significant funds and building global networks, hierarchicals face challenges like declining participation, increasing centralization, and inabilities to adapt to changing environments.<n>This paper explores complex systems and applies complexity science to explain their inefficiencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-03T12:06:15Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - Social Diversity Reduces the Complexity and Cost of Fostering Fairness [63.70639083665108]
We investigate the effects of interference mechanisms which assume incomplete information and flexible standards of fairness.
We quantify the role of diversity and show how it reduces the need for information gathering.
Our results indicate that diversity changes and opens up novel mechanisms available to institutions wishing to promote fairness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-18T21:58:35Z) - Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings.
The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms.
Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z) - Investigating Participation Mechanisms in EU Code Week [68.8204255655161]
Digital competence (DC) is a broad set of skills, attitudes, and knowledge for confident, critical and use of digital technologies.
The aim of the manuscript is to offer a detailed and comprehensive statistical description of Code Week's participation in the EU Member States.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-29T19:16:03Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.