Agentic Software Engineering: Foundational Pillars and a Research Roadmap

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06216v2
• Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 01:01:15 GMT
• Title: Agentic Software Engineering: Foundational Pillars and a Research Roadmap
• Authors: Ahmed E. Hassan, Hao Li, Dayi Lin, Bram Adams, Tse-Hsun Chen, Yutaro Kashiwa, Dong Qiu,
• Abstract summary: Agentic Software Engineering (SE 3.0) represents a new era where intelligent agents are tasked with achieving complex, goal-oriented SE objectives.<n>This paper presents the Structured Agentic Software Engineering (SASE) vision, outlining several of the foundational pillars for the future of SE.
• Score: 15.059942573311481
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Agentic Software Engineering (SE 3.0) represents a new era where intelligent agents are tasked not with simple code generation, but with achieving complex, goal-oriented SE objectives. To harness these new capabilities while ensuring trustworthiness, we must recognize a fundamental duality within the SE field in the Agentic SE era, comprising two symbiotic modalities: SE for Humans and SE for Agents. This duality demands a radical reimagining of the foundational pillars of SE (actors, processes, tools, and artifacts) which manifest differently across each modality. We propose two purpose-built workbenches to support this vision. The Agent Command Environment (ACE) serves as a command center where humans orchestrate and mentor agent teams, handling outputs such as Merge-Readiness Packs (MRPs) and Consultation Request Packs (CRPs). The Agent Execution Environment (AEE) is a digital workspace where agents perform tasks while invoking human expertise when facing ambiguity or complex trade-offs. This bi-directional partnership, which supports agent-initiated human callbacks and handovers, gives rise to new, structured engineering activities (i.e., processes) that redefine human-AI collaboration, elevating the practice from agentic coding to true agentic software engineering. This paper presents the Structured Agentic Software Engineering (SASE) vision, outlining several of the foundational pillars for the future of SE. The paper culminates in a research roadmap that identifies a few key challenges and opportunities while briefly discussing the resulting impact of this future on SE education. Our goal is not to offer a definitive solution, but to provide a conceptual scaffold with structured vocabulary to catalyze a community-wide dialogue, pushing the SE community to think beyond its classic, human-centric tenets toward a disciplined, scalable, and trustworthy agentic future.

Related papers

• Toward an Agentic Infused Software Ecosystem [0.0]
  This paper outlines the creation of an Agentic Infused Software Ecosystem (AISE)<n>To realize the vision of AISE, all three pillars must be advanced in a holistic manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T15:01:29Z)
• Towards 6G Native-AI Edge Networks: A Semantic-Aware and Agentic Intelligence Paradigm [85.7583231789615]
  6G positions intelligence as a native network capability, transforming the design of radio access networks (RANs)<n>Within this vision, Semantic-native communication and agentic intelligence are expected to play central roles.<n>Agentic intelligence endows distributed RAN entities with goal-driven autonomy, reasoning, planning, and multi-agent collaboration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-04T03:09:33Z)
• Toward Agentic Software Engineering Beyond Code: Framing Vision, Values, and Vocabulary [12.819408542293658]
  Agentic AI is poised to usher in a seismic paradigm shift in Software Engineering.<n>This paper contributes to the emerging community vision by recommending an expansion of its scope beyond code.<n>It is hoped that these ideas will encourage community collaborations and steer the SE community towards laying strong foundations of agentic SE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T15:39:58Z)
• Agentic Services Computing [51.50424046053763]
  We propose Agentic Services Computing, a paradigm that reimagines services as autonomous, adaptive, and collaborative agents.<n>We organize ASC around a four-phase lifecycle: Design, Deployment, Operation, and Evolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T07:29:18Z)
• AI Agentic Programming: A Survey of Techniques, Challenges, and Opportunities [4.678921535956218]
  AI agentic programming is an emerging paradigm in which large language models (LLMs) autonomously plan, execute, and interact with external tools.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive and timely review of AI agentic programming.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-15T00:14:31Z)
• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI [0.36868085124383626]
  Review presents a comprehensive analysis of two emerging paradigms in AI-assisted software development: vibe coding and agentic coding.<n> Vibe coding emphasizes intuitive, human-in-the-loop interaction through prompt-based, conversational interaction.<n>Agentic coding enables autonomous software development through goal-driven agents capable of planning, executing, testing, and iterating tasks with minimal human intervention.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T03:00:21Z)
• A Desideratum for Conversational Agents: Capabilities, Challenges, and Future Directions [51.96890647837277]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have propelled conversational AI from traditional dialogue systems into sophisticated agents capable of autonomous actions, contextual awareness, and multi-turn interactions with users.<n>This survey paper presents a desideratum for next-generation Conversational Agents - what has been achieved, what challenges persist, and what must be done for more scalable systems that approach human-level intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T21:01:25Z)
• AgentGym: Evolving Large Language Model-based Agents across Diverse Environments [116.97648507802926]
  Large language models (LLMs) are considered a promising foundation to build such agents. We take the first step towards building generally-capable LLM-based agents with self-evolution ability. We propose AgentGym, a new framework featuring a variety of environments and tasks for broad, real-time, uni-format, and concurrent agent exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T15:15:41Z)
• Designing for Human-Agent Alignment: Understanding what humans want from their agents [31.716736340311318]
  We ran a study about designing agents that can negotiate during a fictional yet relatable task of selling a camera online. We found that for an agent to perform the task successfully, humans/users and agents need to align over 6 dimensions. These findings expand previous work related to process and specification alignment and the need for values and safety in Human-AI interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T03:01:57Z)
• The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey [91.71061158000953]
  Large language models (LLMs) are regarded as potential sparks for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) We start by tracing the concept of agents from its philosophical origins to its development in AI, and explain why LLMs are suitable foundations for agents. We explore the extensive applications of LLM-based agents in three aspects: single-agent scenarios, multi-agent scenarios, and human-agent cooperation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T17:12:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.