AI for Scientific Discovery is a Social Problem

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06580v3
• Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 10:57:09 GMT
• Title: AI for Scientific Discovery is a Social Problem
• Abstract summary: We argue that the primary barriers are social and institutional.<n>We highlight four interconnected challenges: community dysfunction, research priorities with misaligned upstream needs, data fragmentation, and infrastructure inequities.
• Score: 6.165263713559601
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence promises to accelerate scientific discovery, yet its benefits remain unevenly distributed. While technical obstacles such as scarce data, fragmented standards, and unequal access to computation are significant, we argue that the primary barriers are social and institutional. Narratives that defer progress to speculative "AI scientists," the undervaluing of data and infrastructure contributions, misaligned incentives, and gaps between domain experts and machine learning researchers all constrain impact. We highlight four interconnected challenges: community dysfunction, research priorities misaligned with upstream needs, data fragmentation, and infrastructure inequities. We argue that their roots lie in cultural and organizational practices. Addressing them requires not only technical innovation but also intentional community-building, cross-disciplinary education, shared benchmarks, and accessible infrastructure. We call for reframing AI for science as a collective social project, where sustainable collaboration and equitable participation are treated as prerequisites for technical progress.

Related papers

• Hardware is an AI Ethics Problem: Expert Visions for a Sustainable and Equitable Semiconductor Industry [41.55195951929528]
  We conducted a participatory futuring workshop with experts from academia, industry, and policy.<n>Participants envisioned interconnected socio-technical pathways linking present frictions to normative goals.<n>We argue that AI ethics must extend beyond models and data to encompass the hardware infrastructures on which they depend.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-08T00:18:39Z)
• Sustainability and Artificial Intelligence: Necessary, Challenging, and Promising Intersections [1.462436185133865]
  Article aims to map out the necessary, challenging, and promising intersections by providing an overview of the state of art research.<n>Based on 541 data collected from the Web of Science (WoS) database, the findings reveal the increasingly central body of work on green and sustainable science and technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-08T04:09:01Z)
• Open Problems in Mechanistic Interpretability [61.44773053835185]
  Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the computational mechanisms underlying neural networks' capabilities.<n>Despite recent progress toward these goals, there are many open problems in the field that require solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-27T20:57:18Z)
• A Systematic Literature Review on Equity and Technology in HCI and Fairness: Navigating the Complexities and Nuances of Equity Research [14.683980035075754]
  The research community, especially the human-computer interaction (HCI) and Fairness community, has endeavored to integrate equity into technology design.<n>We conducted a systematic literature review on equity and technology, collecting and analyzing 202 papers published in HCI and Fairness-focused venues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-24T19:19:07Z)
• AI Research is not Magic, it has to be Reproducible and Responsible: Challenges in the AI field from the Perspective of its PhD Students [1.1922075410173798]
  We surveyed 28 AI doctoral candidates from 13 European countries. Challenges underscore the findability and quality of AI resources such as datasets, models, and experiments. There is need for immediate adoption of responsible and reproducible AI research practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T12:19:02Z)
• AI Competitions and Benchmarks: The life cycle of challenges and benchmarks [0.49478969093606673]
  We argue for the need to creatively leverage the scientific research and algorithm development community as an axis of robust innovation. Coordinated community engagement in the analysis of highly complex and massive data has emerged as one approach to find robust methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T18:44:10Z)
• Data Science for Social Good [2.8621556092850065]
  We present a framework for "data science for social good" (DSSG) research. We perform an analysis of the literature to empirically demonstrate the paucity of work on DSSG in information systems. We hope that this article and the special issue will spur future DSSG research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T15:40:20Z)
• Artificial Intelligence for Science in Quantum, Atomistic, and Continuum Systems [268.585904751315]
  New area of research known as AI for science (AI4Science)<n>Areas aim at understanding the physical world from subatomic (wavefunctions and electron density), atomic (molecules, proteins, materials, and interactions), to macro (fluids, climate, and subsurface) scales.<n>Key common challenge is how to capture physics first principles, especially symmetries, in natural systems by deep learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-17T12:14:14Z)
• The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence [67.70415658080121]
  Recent advances in machine learning and AI are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-09T21:16:56Z)
• Coordinated Science Laboratory 70th Anniversary Symposium: The Future of Computing [80.72844751804166]
  In 2021, the Coordinated Science Laboratory CSL hosted the Future of Computing Symposium to celebrate its 70th anniversary. We summarize the major technological points, insights, and directions that speakers brought forward during the symposium. Participants discussed topics related to new computing paradigms, technologies, algorithms, behaviors, and research challenges to be expected in the future.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T17:32:27Z)
• Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
  It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective. Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research. This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z)
• Axes for Sociotechnical Inquiry in AI Research [3.0215443986383734]
  We propose four directions for inquiry into new and evolving areas of technological development. The paper provides a lexicon for sociotechnical inquiry and illustrates it through the example of consumer drone technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T16:49:04Z)
• Learnings from Frontier Development Lab and SpaceML -- AI Accelerators for NASA and ESA [57.06643156253045]
  Research with AI and ML technologies lives in a variety of settings with often asynchronous goals and timelines. We perform a case study of the Frontier Development Lab (FDL), an AI accelerator under a public-private partnership from NASA and ESA. FDL research follows principled practices that are grounded in responsible development, conduct, and dissemination of AI research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T21:23:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.