AI Research is not Magic, it has to be Reproducible and Responsible: Challenges in the AI field from the Perspective of its PhD Students
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06847v1
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 12:19:02 GMT
- Title: AI Research is not Magic, it has to be Reproducible and Responsible: Challenges in the AI field from the Perspective of its PhD Students
- Authors: Andrea Hrckova, Jennifer Renoux, Rafael Tolosana Calasanz, Daniela Chuda, Martin Tamajka, Jakub Simko,
- Abstract summary: We surveyed 28 AI doctoral candidates from 13 European countries.
Challenges underscore the findability and quality of AI resources such as datasets, models, and experiments.
There is need for immediate adoption of responsible and reproducible AI research practices.
- Score: 1.1922075410173798
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: With the goal of uncovering the challenges faced by European AI students during their research endeavors, we surveyed 28 AI doctoral candidates from 13 European countries. The outcomes underscore challenges in three key areas: (1) the findability and quality of AI resources such as datasets, models, and experiments; (2) the difficulties in replicating the experiments in AI papers; (3) and the lack of trustworthiness and interdisciplinarity. From our findings, it appears that although early stage AI researchers generally tend to share their AI resources, they lack motivation or knowledge to engage more in dataset and code preparation and curation, and ethical assessments, and are not used to cooperate with well-versed experts in application domains. Furthermore, we examine existing practices in data governance and reproducibility both in computer science and in artificial intelligence. For instance, only a minority of venues actively promote reproducibility initiatives such as reproducibility evaluations. Critically, there is need for immediate adoption of responsible and reproducible AI research practices, crucial for society at large, and essential for the AI research community in particular. This paper proposes a combination of social and technical recommendations to overcome the identified challenges. Socially, we propose the general adoption of reproducibility initiatives in AI conferences and journals, as well as improved interdisciplinary collaboration, especially in data governance practices. On the technical front, we call for enhanced tools to better support versioning control of datasets and code, and a computing infrastructure that facilitates the sharing and discovery of AI resources, as well as the sharing, execution, and verification of experiments.
Related papers
- AI4Research: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence for Scientific Research [55.5452803680643]
We present a comprehensive survey on AI for Research (AI4Research)<n>We first introduce a systematic taxonomy to classify five mainstream tasks in AI4Research.<n>We identify key research gaps and highlight promising future directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-02T17:19:20Z) - Social Scientists on the Role of AI in Research [2.2665233748698355]
We present a community-centric study drawing on 284 survey responses and 15 semi-structured interviews with social scientists.<n>We find that the use of AI in research settings has increased significantly among social scientists in step with the widespread popularity of generative AI (genAI)<n>Ethical concerns, particularly around automation bias, deskilling, research misconduct, complex interpretability, and representational harm, are raised in relation to genAI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-12T19:55:36Z) - The AI Imperative: Scaling High-Quality Peer Review in Machine Learning [49.87236114682497]
We argue that AI-assisted peer review must become an urgent research and infrastructure priority.<n>We propose specific roles for AI in enhancing factual verification, guiding reviewer performance, assisting authors in quality improvement, and supporting ACs in decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-09T18:37:14Z) - Open and Sustainable AI: challenges, opportunities and the road ahead in the life sciences [50.9036832382286]
We review the increased erosion of trust in AI research outputs, driven by the issues of poor reusability.<n>We discuss the fragmented components of the AI ecosystem and lack of guiding pathways to best support Open and Sustainable AI.<n>Our work connects researchers with relevant AI resources, facilitating the implementation of sustainable, reusable and transparent AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-22T12:52:34Z) - Position: We Need Responsible, Application-Driven (RAD) AI Research [5.472297350890938]
This position paper argues that achieving meaningful scientific and societal advances with artificial intelligence (AI) requires a responsible, application-driven approach (RAD) to AI research.<n>We present a vision for the future of application-driven AI research to unlock new value through technically feasible methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-07T03:43:52Z) - Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.
We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z) - Transforming Science with Large Language Models: A Survey on AI-assisted Scientific Discovery, Experimentation, Content Generation, and Evaluation [58.064940977804596]
A plethora of new AI models and tools has been proposed, promising to empower researchers and academics worldwide to conduct their research more effectively and efficiently.
Ethical concerns regarding shortcomings of these tools and potential for misuse take a particularly prominent place in our discussion.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-07T18:26:45Z) - Navigating Ethical Challenges in Generative AI-Enhanced Research: The ETHICAL Framework for Responsible Generative AI Use [0.0]
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in research presents both opportunities and ethical challenges.
This paper develops the ETHICAL framework, which is a practical guide for responsible GenAI use in research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-11T05:49:11Z) - OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI [73.75520820608232]
We introduce OlympicArena, which includes 11,163 bilingual problems across both text-only and interleaved text-image modalities.
These challenges encompass a wide range of disciplines spanning seven fields and 62 international Olympic competitions, rigorously examined for data leakage.
Our evaluations reveal that even advanced models like GPT-4o only achieve a 39.97% overall accuracy, illustrating current AI limitations in complex reasoning and multimodal integration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-18T16:20:53Z) - Beyond principlism: Practical strategies for ethical AI use in research practices [0.0]
The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence in scientific research has outpaced the development of ethical guidelines.
Existing approaches offer little practical guidance for addressing ethical challenges of AI in scientific research practices.
I propose a user-centered, realism-inspired approach to bridge the gap between abstract principles and day-to-day research practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-27T03:53:25Z) - AI for social science and social science of AI: A Survey [47.5235291525383]
Recent advancements in artificial intelligence have sparked a rethinking of artificial general intelligence possibilities.
The increasing human-like capabilities of AI are also attracting attention in social science research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-22T10:57:09Z) - Investigating Responsible AI for Scientific Research: An Empirical Study [4.597781832707524]
The push for Responsible AI (RAI) in such institutions underscores the increasing emphasis on integrating ethical considerations within AI design and development.
This paper aims to assess the awareness and preparedness regarding the ethical risks inherent in AI design and development.
Our results have revealed certain knowledge gaps concerning ethical, responsible, and inclusive AI, with limitations in awareness of the available AI ethics frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T06:40:27Z) - On the Opportunities of Green Computing: A Survey [80.21955522431168]
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has achieved significant advancements in technology and research with the development over several decades.
The needs for high computing power brings higher carbon emission and undermines research fairness.
To tackle the challenges of computing resources and environmental impact of AI, Green Computing has become a hot research topic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-01T11:16:41Z) - The ethical ambiguity of AI data enrichment: Measuring gaps in research
ethics norms and practices [2.28438857884398]
This study explores how, and to what extent, comparable research ethics requirements and norms have developed for AI research and data enrichment.
Leading AI venues have begun to establish protocols for human data collection, but these are are inconsistently followed by authors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T16:12:55Z) - The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and
Strategies [97.5153823429076]
The benefits, challenges and drawbacks of AI in this field are reviewed.
The use of data augmentation, explainable AI, and the integration of AI with traditional experimental methods are also discussed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-08T23:23:39Z) - Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and
Stir" [76.44130385507894]
This paper aims to ground what we dub a 'participatory turn' in AI design by synthesizing existing literature on participation and through empirical analysis of its current practices.
Based on our literature synthesis and empirical research, this paper presents a conceptual framework for analyzing participatory approaches to AI design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T17:57:04Z) - Empowering Local Communities Using Artificial Intelligence [70.17085406202368]
It has become an important topic to explore the impact of AI on society from a people-centered perspective.
Previous works in citizen science have identified methods of using AI to engage the public in research.
This article discusses the challenges of applying AI in Community Citizen Science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-05T12:51:11Z) - A narrowing of AI research? [0.0]
We study the evolution of the thematic diversity of AI research in academia and the private sector.
We measure the influence of private companies in AI research through the citations they receive and their collaborations with other institutions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-22T08:23:56Z) - Report prepared by the Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) on
Publication Norms for Responsible AI [0.0]
Montreal AI Ethics Institute co-hosted two public consultations with the Partnership on AI in May 2020.
The meetups examined potential publication norms for responsible AI.
MAIEI provides six initial recommendations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-15T17:51:40Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.