Renewable Energy Sources Selection Analysis with the Maximizing Deviation Method

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.07011v1
• Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2025 11:17:58 GMT
• Title: Renewable Energy Sources Selection Analysis with the Maximizing Deviation Method
• Authors: Kirisci Murat,
• Abstract summary: Fuzzy logic and fuzzy set theory are utilized with multi-criteria decision-making methods.<n>The proposed method was applied to the problem of selecting renewable energy sources.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-criteria decision-making methods provide decision-makers with appropriate tools to make better decisions in uncertain, complex, and conflicting situations. Fuzzy set theory primarily deals with the uncertainty inherent in human thoughts and perceptions and attempts to quantify this uncertainty. Fuzzy logic and fuzzy set theory are utilized with multi-criteria decision-making methods because they effectively handle uncertainty and fuzziness in decision-makers' judgments, allowing for verbal judgments of the problem. This study utilizes the Fermatean fuzzy environment, a generalization of fuzzy sets. An optimization model based on the deviation maximization method is proposed to determine partially known feature weights. This method is combined with interval-valued Fermatean fuzzy sets. The proposed method was applied to the problem of selecting renewable energy sources. The reason for choosing renewable energy sources is that meeting energy needs from renewable sources, balancing carbon emissions, and mitigating the effects of global climate change are among the most critical issues of the recent period. Even though selecting renewable energy sources is a technical issue, the managerial and political implications of this issue are also important, and are discussed in this study.

Related papers

• A Principled Approach to Randomized Selection under Uncertainty: Applications to Peer Review and Grant Funding [68.43987626137512]
  We propose a principled framework for randomized decision-making based on interval estimates of the quality of each item.<n>We introduce MERIT, an optimization-based method that maximizes the worst-case expected number of top candidates selected.<n>We prove that MERIT satisfies desirable axiomatic properties not guaranteed by existing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T19:59:30Z)
• Differentiable Distributionally Robust Optimization Layers [10.667165962654996]
  We develop differentiable DRO layers for generic mixed-integer DRO problems with parameterized second-order conic ambiguity sets. We propose a novel dual-view methodology by handling continuous and discrete parts of decisions via different principles. Specifically, we construct a differentiable energy-based surrogate to implement the dual-view methodology and use importance sampling to estimate its gradient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T12:09:19Z)
• Benchmarking PtO and PnO Methods in the Predictive Combinatorial Optimization Regime [59.27851754647913]
  Predictive optimization is the precise modeling of many real-world applications, including energy cost-aware scheduling and budget allocation on advertising. We develop a modular framework to benchmark 11 existing PtO/PnO methods on 8 problems, including a new industrial dataset for advertising. Our study shows that PnO approaches are better than PtO on 7 out of 8 benchmarks, but there is no silver bullet found for the specific design choices of PnO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T13:19:34Z)
• Streamlining Energy Transition Scenarios to Key Policy Decisions [3.737361598712633]
  We derive interpretable storylines from stakeholder discussions using decision trees. Our results show that choosing a high deployment of renewables makes global decarbonization scenarios robust against uncertainties in climate sensitivity and demand. Our transferrable approach translates vast energy model results into a small set of critical decisions, guiding decision-makers in prioritizing the key factors that will shape the energy transition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-11T18:10:32Z)
• The Importance of Time in Causal Algorithmic Recourse [0.0]
  The application of Algorithmic Recourse in decision-making is a promising field that offers practical solutions to reverse unfavorable decisions. Recent advancements have incorporated knowledge of causal dependencies, thereby enhancing the quality of the recommended recourse actions. We motivate the need to integrate the temporal dimension into causal algorithmic methods to enhance recommendations' plausibility and reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T10:20:08Z)
• On solving decision and risk management problems subject to uncertainty [91.3755431537592]
  Uncertainty is a pervasive challenge in decision and risk management. This paper develops a systematic understanding of such strategies, determine their range of application, and develop a framework to better employ them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-18T19:16:23Z)
• Active Inference for Autonomous Decision-Making with Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits [1.3670071336891754]
  In autonomous robotic decision-making under uncertainty, the tradeoff between exploitation and exploration of available options must be considered. In this study, we apply active inference, which has been actively studied in the field of neuroscience in recent years, as an alternative action selection strategy for CMABs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-19T17:11:21Z)
• Off-Policy Evaluation with Policy-Dependent Optimization Response [90.28758112893054]
  We develop a new framework for off-policy evaluation with a textitpolicy-dependent linear optimization response. We construct unbiased estimators for the policy-dependent estimand by a perturbation method. We provide a general algorithm for optimizing causal interventions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T20:25:37Z)
• Inverse Active Sensing: Modeling and Understanding Timely Decision-Making [111.07204912245841]
  We develop a framework for the general setting of evidence-based decision-making under endogenous, context-dependent time pressure. We demonstrate how it enables modeling intuitive notions of surprise, suspense, and optimality in decision strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T02:30:45Z)
• The Two Kinds of Free Energy and the Bayesian Revolution [0.0]
  We argue that there are essentially two different notions of free energy in current models of intelligent agency. One appears when trading off accuracy and uncertainty based on a general maximum entropy principle. The other formulates action selection in terms of minimizing an error measure that quantifies deviations of beliefs and policies from given reference models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-24T14:09:28Z)
• Risk-Aware Energy Scheduling for Edge Computing with Microgrid: A Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach [82.6692222294594]
  We study a risk-aware energy scheduling problem for a microgrid-powered MEC network. We derive the solution by applying a multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MADRL)-based advantage actor-critic (A3C) algorithm with shared neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T02:14:38Z)
• Targeted free energy estimation via learned mappings [66.20146549150475]
  Free energy perturbation (FEP) was proposed by Zwanzig more than six decades ago as a method to estimate free energy differences. FEP suffers from a severe limitation: the requirement of sufficient overlap between distributions. One strategy to mitigate this problem, called Targeted Free Energy Perturbation, uses a high-dimensional mapping in configuration space to increase overlap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-12T11:10:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.