Signals in the Noise: Decoding Unexpected Engagement Patterns on Twitter
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08128v1
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 20:10:17 GMT
- Title: Signals in the Noise: Decoding Unexpected Engagement Patterns on Twitter
- Authors: Yulin Yu, Houming Chen, Daniel Romero, Paramveer S. Dhillon,
- Abstract summary: We investigate why certain tweets receive unexpectedly high levels of one type of engagement relative to others.<n>Our analysis of over 600,000 tweets reveals distinct patterns in how content characteristics influence unexpected engagement.
- Score: 3.222797320629009
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Social media platforms offer users multiple ways to engage with content--likes, retweets, and comments--creating a complex signaling system within the attention economy. While previous research has examined factors driving overall engagement, less is known about why certain tweets receive unexpectedly high levels of one type of engagement relative to others. Drawing on Signaling Theory and Attention Economy Theory, we investigate these unexpected engagement patterns on Twitter (now known as "X"), developing an "unexpectedness quotient" to quantify deviations from predicted engagement levels. Our analysis of over 600,000 tweets reveals distinct patterns in how content characteristics influence unexpected engagement. News, politics, and business tweets receive more retweets and comments than expected, suggesting users prioritize sharing and discussing informational content. In contrast, games and sports-related topics garner unexpected likes and comments, indicating higher emotional investment in these domains. The relationship between content attributes and engagement types follows clear patterns: subjective tweets attract more likes while objective tweets receive more retweets, and longer, complex tweets with URLs unexpectedly receive more retweets. These findings demonstrate how users employ different engagement types as signals of varying strength based on content characteristics, and how certain content types more effectively compete for attention in the social media ecosystem. Our results offer valuable insights for content creators optimizing engagement strategies, platform designers facilitating meaningful interactions, and researchers studying online social behavior.
Related papers
- DISHONEST: Dissecting misInformation Spread using Homogeneous sOcial NEtworks and Semantic Topic classification [2.6356166840419717]
COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant rise in spread of misinformation on online platforms such as Twitter.<n>We use Twitter's network of retweets to study social interactions and topic modeling to study tweet content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-12T18:53:46Z) - Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph
with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics.
Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z) - ViralBERT: A User Focused BERT-Based Approach to Virality Prediction [11.992815669875924]
We propose ViralBERT, which can be used to predict the virality of tweets using content- and user-based features.
We employ a method of concatenating numerical features such as hashtags and follower numbers to tweet text, and utilise two BERT modules.
We collect a dataset of 330k tweets to train ViralBERT and validate the efficacy of our model using baselines from current studies in this field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-17T21:40:24Z) - What goes on inside rumour and non-rumour tweets and their reactions: A
Psycholinguistic Analyses [58.75684238003408]
psycho-linguistics analyses of social media text are vital for drawing meaningful conclusions to mitigate misinformation.
This research contributes by performing an in-depth psycholinguistic analysis of rumours related to various kinds of events.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-09T07:45:11Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Understanding Information Spreading Mechanisms During COVID-19 Pandemic
by Analyzing the Impact of Tweet Text and User Features for Retweet
Prediction [6.658785818853953]
COVID-19 has affected the world economy and the daily life routine of almost everyone.
Social media platforms enable users to share information with other users who can reshare this information.
We propose two CNN and RNN based models and evaluate the performance of these models on a publicly available TweetsCOV19 dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-26T15:55:58Z) - Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news.
In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities.
We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z) - Privacy-Aware Recommender Systems Challenge on Twitter's Home Timeline [47.434392695347924]
RecSys 2020 Challenge organized by ACM RecSys in partnership with Twitter using this dataset.
This paper touches on the key challenges faced by researchers and professionals striving to predict user engagements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-28T23:54:33Z) - That Message Went Viral?! Exploratory Analytics and Sentiment Analysis
into the Propagation of Tweets [0.0]
We conducted an exploratory analysis on a dataset of over a million Tweets.
We identified the most popular messages, and analyzed the tweets on multiple endogenous dimensions.
We found some interesting patterns and uncovered new insights to help researchers and practitioners better understand the behavior of popular viral tweets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T02:38:53Z) - Echo Chambers on Social Media: A comparative analysis [64.2256216637683]
We introduce an operational definition of echo chambers and perform a massive comparative analysis on 1B pieces of contents produced by 1M users on four social media platforms.
We infer the leaning of users about controversial topics and reconstruct their interaction networks by analyzing different features.
We find support for the hypothesis that platforms implementing news feed algorithms like Facebook may elicit the emergence of echo-chambers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-20T20:00:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.