The Impact of Team Diversity in Agile Development Education
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08389v1
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:32:50 GMT
- Title: The Impact of Team Diversity in Agile Development Education
- Authors: Marco Torchiano, Riccardo Coppola, Antonio Vetro', Xhoi Musaj,
- Abstract summary: We aim to assess the impact of team diversity, focusing mainly on gender and nationality, in the context of an agile software development project-based course.<n>We analyzed 51 teams over three academic years, measuring three different Diversity indexes - regarding Gender, Nationality and their co-presence.<n>Our findings, overall, show that promoting diversity in teams does not negatively impact their performance and achievement of educational goals.
- Score: 2.963223599781967
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: Software Engineering is mostly a male-dominated sector, where gender diversity is a key feature for improving equality of opportunities, productivity, and innovation. Other diversity aspects, including but not limited to nationality and ethnicity, are often understudied.In this work we aim to assess the impact of team diversity, focusing mainly on gender and nationality, in the context of an agile software development project-based course. We analyzed 51 teams over three academic years, measuring three different Diversity indexes - regarding Gender, Nationality and their co-presence - to examine how different aspects of diversity impact the quality of team project outcomes.Statistical analysis revealed a moderate, statistically significant correlation between gender diversity and project success, aligning with existing literature. Diversity in nationality showed a negative but negligible effect on project results, indicating that promoting these aspects does not harm students' performance. Analyzing their co-presence within a team, gender and nationality combined had a negative impact, likely due to increased communication barriers and differing cultural norms.This study underscores the importance of considering multiple diversity dimensions and their interactions in educational settings. Our findings, overall, show that promoting diversity in teams does not negatively impact their performance and achievement of educational goals.
Related papers
- The Effect of Gender Diversity on Scientific Team Impact: A Team Roles Perspective [13.318002141663579]
We use multivariable regression to examine the association between gender diversity in leadership and support roles and team impact.<n>The results show that the relationship between gender diversity and team impact follows an inverted U-shape for both leadership and support groups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-29T12:49:21Z) - An Empirical Study on the Impact of Gender Diversity on Code Quality in AI Systems [2.2160604288512324]
Underrepresentation of women in software engineering raises concerns about robustness in AI development.<n>This study examines how gender diversity within AI teams influences project popularity, code quality, and individual contributions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-06T00:37:27Z) - Exploring the Role of Women in Hugging Face Organizations [46.84136061744368]
Women are highly underrepresented in both organizations and commits distribution.<n>Addressing gender disparities is essential to create more equitable, diverse, and inclusive open-source ecosystems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-21T10:06:52Z) - Saliency-Based diversity and fairness Metric and FaceKeepOriginalAugment: A Novel Approach for Enhancing Fairness and Diversity [46.74201905814679]
We introduce an extension of the KeepOriginalAugment method, termed FaceKeepOriginalAugment, which explores various debiasing aspects-geographical, gender, and stereotypical biases-in computer vision models.
By maintaining a delicate balance between data diversity and information preservation, our approach empowers models to exploit both diverse salient and non-salient regions.
We quantify dataset diversity across a range of datasets, including Flickr Faces HQ (FFHQ), WIKI, IMDB, Labelled Faces in the Wild (LFW), UTK Faces, and Diverse dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-29T13:49:23Z) - GenderCARE: A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing and Reducing Gender Bias in Large Language Models [73.23743278545321]
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in natural language generation, but have also been observed to magnify societal biases.<n>GenderCARE is a comprehensive framework that encompasses innovative Criteria, bias Assessment, Reduction techniques, and Evaluation metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T15:35:46Z) - The Factuality Tax of Diversity-Intervened Text-to-Image Generation: Benchmark and Fact-Augmented Intervention [61.80236015147771]
We quantify the trade-off between using diversity interventions and preserving demographic factuality in T2I models.
Experiments on DoFaiR reveal that diversity-oriented instructions increase the number of different gender and racial groups.
We propose Fact-Augmented Intervention (FAI) to reflect on verbalized or retrieved factual information about gender and racial compositions of generation subjects in history.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-29T09:09:42Z) - Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Competence in Large Language Models [53.626808086522985]
We focus on extrinsic evaluation of cultural competence in two text generation tasks.
We evaluate model outputs when an explicit cue of culture, specifically nationality, is perturbed in the prompts.
We find weak correlations between text similarity of outputs for different countries and the cultural values of these countries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T14:03:27Z) - Assessing the Influence of Toxic and Gender Discriminatory Communication on Perceptible Diversity in OSS Projects [2.526146573337397]
The presence of toxic and gender-identity derogatory language in open-source software (OSS) communities has recently become a focal point for researchers.
This study aims to investigate how such content influences the gender, ethnicity, and tenure diversity of open-source software development teams.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-12T22:48:21Z) - Comparing Biases and the Impact of Multilingual Training across Multiple
Languages [70.84047257764405]
We present a bias analysis across Italian, Chinese, English, Hebrew, and Spanish on the downstream sentiment analysis task.
We adapt existing sentiment bias templates in English to Italian, Chinese, Hebrew, and Spanish for four attributes: race, religion, nationality, and gender.
Our results reveal similarities in bias expression such as favoritism of groups that are dominant in each language's culture.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-18T18:15:07Z) - The Double-Edged Sword of Diversity: How Diversity, Conflict, and
Psychological Safety Impact Software Teams [6.190511747986327]
Team diversity can be seen as a double-edged sword, bringing cognitive resources to teams at the risk of increased conflict.
This study views diversity through the lens of the categorization-elaboration model (CEM)
We investigated how diversity in gender, age, role, and cultural background impacts team effectiveness and conflict.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-30T14:54:44Z) - How diverse is the ACII community? Analysing gender, geographical and
business diversity of Affective Computing research [0.0]
ACII is the premier international forum for presenting the latest research on affective computing.
We measure diversity in terms of gender, geographic location and academia vs research centres vs industry, and consider three different actors: authors, keynote speakers and organizers.
Results raise awareness on the limited diversity in the field, in all studied facets, and compared to other AI conferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-12T18:30:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.