The Effect of Gender Diversity on Scientific Team Impact: A Team Roles Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23429v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 12:49:21 GMT
• Title: The Effect of Gender Diversity on Scientific Team Impact: A Team Roles Perspective
• Authors: Yi Zhao, Yongjun Zhu, Donghun Kim, Yuzhuo Wang, Heng Zhang, Chao Lu, Chengzhi Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We use multivariable regression to examine the association between gender diversity in leadership and support roles and team impact.<n>The results show that the relationship between gender diversity and team impact follows an inverted U-shape for both leadership and support groups.
• Score: 13.318002141663579
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The influence of gender diversity on the success of scientific teams is of great interest to academia. However, prior findings remain inconsistent, and most studies operationalize diversity in aggregate terms, overlooking internal role differentiation. This limitation obscures a more nuanced understanding of how gender diversity shapes team impact. In particular, the effect of gender diversity across different team roles remains poorly understood. To this end, we define a scientific team as all coauthors of a paper and measure team impact through five-year citation counts. Using author contribution statements, we classified members into leadership and support roles. Drawing on more than 130,000 papers from PLOS journals, most of which are in biomedical-related disciplines, we employed multivariable regression to examine the association between gender diversity in these roles and team impact. Furthermore, we apply a threshold regression model to investigate how team size moderates this relationship. The results show that (1) the relationship between gender diversity and team impact follows an inverted U-shape for both leadership and support groups; (2) teams with an all-female leadership group and an all-male support group achieve higher impact than other team types. Interestingly, (3) the effect of leadership-group gender diversity is significantly negative for small teams but becomes positive and statistically insignificant in large teams. In contrast, the estimates for support-group gender diversity remain significant and positive, regardless of team size.

Related papers

• The Impact of Team Diversity in Agile Development Education [2.963223599781967]
  We aim to assess the impact of team diversity, focusing mainly on gender and nationality, in the context of an agile software development project-based course.<n>We analyzed 51 teams over three academic years, measuring three different Diversity indexes - regarding Gender, Nationality and their co-presence.<n>Our findings, overall, show that promoting diversity in teams does not negatively impact their performance and achievement of educational goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T08:32:50Z)
• Diverse, but Divisive: LLMs Can Exaggerate Gender Differences in Opinion Related to Harms of Misinformation [8.066880413153187]
  This paper examines whether a large language model (LLM) can reflect the views of various groups when assessing the harms of misinformation. We present the TopicMisinfo dataset, containing 160 fact-checked claims from diverse topics. We find that GPT 3.5-Turbo reflects empirically observed gender differences in opinion but amplifies the extent of these differences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T20:50:28Z)
• About latent roles in forecasting players in team sports [47.066729480128856]
  Team sports contain a significant social component that influences interactions between teammates and opponents. We create RolFor, a novel end-to-end model for Role-based Forecasting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T13:33:23Z)
• The Double-Edged Sword of Diversity: How Diversity, Conflict, and Psychological Safety Impact Software Teams [6.190511747986327]
  Team diversity can be seen as a double-edged sword, bringing cognitive resources to teams at the risk of increased conflict. This study views diversity through the lens of the categorization-elaboration model (CEM) We investigated how diversity in gender, age, role, and cultural background impacts team effectiveness and conflict.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T14:54:44Z)
• Informational Diversity and Affinity Bias in Team Growth Dynamics [6.729250803621849]
  We show that the benefits of informational diversity are in tension with affinity bias. Our results formalize a fundamental limitation of utility-based motivations to drive informational diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T05:02:40Z)
• Towards Understanding Gender-Seniority Compound Bias in Natural Language Generation [64.65911758042914]
  We investigate how seniority impacts the degree of gender bias exhibited in pretrained neural generation models. Our results show that GPT-2 amplifies bias by considering women as junior and men as senior more often than the ground truth in both domains. These results suggest that NLP applications built using GPT-2 may harm women in professional capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-19T20:05:02Z)
• Flat Teams Drive Scientific Innovation [43.65818554474622]
  We show how individual activities cohere into broad roles of leadership through the direction and presentation of research. The hidden hierarchy of a scientific team is characterized by its lead (or L)-ratio of members playing leadership roles to total team size. We find that relative to flat, egalitarian teams, tall, hierarchical teams produce less novelty and more often develop existing ideas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-18T04:07:49Z)
• Pick Your Battles: Interaction Graphs as Population-Level Objectives for Strategic Diversity [49.68758494467258]
  We study how to construct diverse populations of agents by carefully structuring how individuals within a population interact. Our approach is based on interaction graphs, which control the flow of information between agents during training. We provide evidence for the importance of diversity in multi-agent training and analyse the effect of applying different interaction graphs on the training trajectories, diversity and performance of populations in a range of games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-08T11:29:52Z)
• How True is GPT-2? An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases [50.591267188664666]
  Downstream applications are at risk of inheriting biases contained in natural language models. We analyze the occupational biases of a popular generative language model, GPT-2. For a given job, GPT-2 reflects the societal skew of gender and ethnicity in the US, and in some cases, pulls the distribution towards gender parity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T11:10:27Z)
• Gender bias in magazines oriented to men and women: a computational approach [58.720142291102135]
  We compare the content of a women-oriented magazine with that of a men-oriented one, both produced by the same editorial group over a decade. With Topic Modelling techniques we identify the main themes discussed in the magazines and quantify how much the presence of these topics differs between magazines over time. Our results show that the frequency of appearance of the topics Family, Business and Women as sex objects, present an initial bias that tends to disappear over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T14:02:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.