Interpretability as Alignment: Making Internal Understanding a Design Principle

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.08592v1
• Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 13:45:59 GMT
• Title: Interpretability as Alignment: Making Internal Understanding a Design Principle
• Abstract summary: Interpretability provides a route to internal transparency by revealing the computations that drive outputs.<n>We argue that interpretability especially mechanistic approaches should be treated as a design principle for alignment, not an auxiliary diagnostic tool.
• Score: 3.6704226968275253
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large neural models are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings, raising concerns about whether their behavior reliably aligns with human values. Interpretability provides a route to internal transparency by revealing the computations that drive outputs. We argue that interpretability especially mechanistic approaches should be treated as a design principle for alignment, not an auxiliary diagnostic tool. Post-hoc methods such as LIME or SHAP offer intuitive but correlational explanations, while mechanistic techniques like circuit tracing or activation patching yield causal insight into internal failures, including deceptive or misaligned reasoning that behavioral methods like RLHF, red teaming, or Constitutional AI may overlook. Despite these advantages, interpretability faces challenges of scalability, epistemic uncertainty, and mismatches between learned representations and human concepts. Our position is that progress on safe and trustworthy AI will depend on making interpretability a first-class objective of AI research and development, ensuring that systems are not only effective but also auditable, transparent, and aligned with human intent.

Related papers

• From Knowing to Acting: Benchmarking Self-Awareness Capability of LLM Agents [69.07911499189129]
  We introduce KAPRO, a framework that evaluates cognitive-behavioral alignment by decoupling an agent's metacognitive judgment (Knowing) from its spontaneous execution (Acting)<n>Experiments show that self-awareness capability is strongly correlated with task success but degrades sharply in internal-capability settings.<n> proprietary and reasoning-oriented models demonstrate more reliable cognitive gating.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-09T17:17:08Z)
• Towards Trustworthy and Explainable AI for Perception Models: From Concept to Prototype Vehicle Deployment [0.9786690381850356]
  Deep Neural Networks have become the dominant solution for Autonomous Driving perception, but their opacity conflicts with emerging Trustworthy AI guidelines.<n>We propose a Trustworthy AI perception module that is remarkably robust, integrates faithful explainability, and uncertainty estimates.<n>Experiments show faithful saliency behavior, improved robustness, and well-calibrated uncertainty estimates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-15T15:47:01Z)
• Explainable Human Activity Recognition: A Unified Review of Concepts and Mechanisms [2.9396318146965332]
  Human activity recognition (HAR) has become a key component of intelligent systems for healthcare monitoring, assistive living, smart environments, and human-computer interaction.<n>Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has emerged as a critical direction for making HAR systems more transparent and human-centered.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive review of explainable HAR methods across wearable, ambient, physiological, and multimodal sensing settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T18:20:47Z)
• Mechanistic Interpretability for Large Language Model Alignment: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions [16.821238326410324]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable capabilities across diverse tasks, yet their internal decision-making processes remain largely opaque.<n>Mechanistic interpretability has emerged as a critical research direction for understanding and aligning these models.<n>We analyze how interpretability insights have informed alignment strategies including reinforcement learning from human feedback, constitutional AI, and scalable oversight.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T11:43:57Z)
• The AI Cognitive Trojan Horse: How Large Language Models May Bypass Human Epistemic Vigilance [0.0]
  Large language model (LLM)-based conversational AI systems present a challenge to human cognition.<n>This paper proposes that a significant epistemic risk from conversational AI may lie not in inaccuracy or intentional deception, but in something more fundamental.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-11T22:28:56Z)
• When the Coffee Feature Activates on Coffins: An Analysis of Feature Extraction and Steering for Mechanistic Interpretability [0.0]
  Recent work by Anthropic on Mechanistic interpretability claims to understand and control Large Language Models.<n>We conduct an initial stress-test of these claims by replicating their main results with open-source SAEs for Llama 3.1.<n>We find that feature steering exhibits substantial fragility, with sensitivity to layer selection, steering magnitude, and context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T14:29:51Z)
• Fantastic Reasoning Behaviors and Where to Find Them: Unsupervised Discovery of the Reasoning Process [66.38541693477181]
  We propose an unsupervised framework for discovering reasoning vectors, which we define as directions in the activation space that encode distinct reasoning behaviors.<n>By segmenting chain-of-thought traces into sentence-level'steps', we uncover disentangled features corresponding to interpretable behaviors such as reflection and backtracking.<n>We demonstrate the ability to control response confidence by identifying confidence-related vectors in the SAE decoder space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-30T05:09:11Z)
• Is Trust Correlated With Explainability in AI? A Meta-Analysis [0.0]
  We conduct a comprehensive examination of the existing literature to explore the relationship between AI explainability and trust.<n>Our analysis, incorporating data from 90 studies, reveals a statistically significant but moderate positive correlation between the explainability of AI systems and the trust they engender.<n>This research highlights its broader socio-technical implications, particularly in promoting accountability and fostering user trust in critical domains such as healthcare and justice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T23:30:55Z)
• Meta-Representational Predictive Coding: Biomimetic Self-Supervised Learning [51.22185316175418]
  We present a new form of predictive coding that we call meta-representational predictive coding (MPC)<n>MPC sidesteps the need for learning a generative model of sensory input by learning to predict representations of sensory input across parallel streams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-22T22:13:14Z)
• Interpretable Concept-Based Memory Reasoning [12.562474638728194]
  Concept-based Memory Reasoner (CMR) is a novel CBM designed to provide a human-understandable and provably-verifiable task prediction process. CMR achieves better accuracy-interpretability trade-offs to state-of-the-art CBMs, discovers logic rules consistent with ground truths, allows for rule interventions, and allows pre-deployment verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T10:32:48Z)
• Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Review [28.427951836334188]
  This review explores mechanistic interpretability. Mechanistic interpretability could help prevent catastrophic outcomes as AI systems become more powerful and inscrutable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T11:01:51Z)
• Tuning-Free Accountable Intervention for LLM Deployment -- A Metacognitive Approach [55.613461060997004]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have catalyzed transformative advances across a spectrum of natural language processing tasks. We propose an innovative textitmetacognitive approach, dubbed textbfCLEAR, to equip LLMs with capabilities for self-aware error identification and correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T19:18:53Z)
• Mathematical Algorithm Design for Deep Learning under Societal and Judicial Constraints: The Algorithmic Transparency Requirement [65.26723285209853]
  We derive a framework to analyze whether a transparent implementation in a computing model is feasible. Based on previous results, we find that Blum-Shub-Smale Machines have the potential to establish trustworthy solvers for inverse problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T15:32:38Z)
• Interpretable Self-Aware Neural Networks for Robust Trajectory Prediction [50.79827516897913]
  We introduce an interpretable paradigm for trajectory prediction that distributes the uncertainty among semantic concepts. We validate our approach on real-world autonomous driving data, demonstrating superior performance over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T06:28:20Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space [62.997667081978825]
  Counterfactual explanations aim to provide to end users a set of features that need to be changed in order to achieve a desired outcome. Current approaches rarely take into account the feasibility of actions needed to achieve the proposed explanations. We present Counterfactual Explanations as Interventions in Latent Space (CEILS), a methodology to generate counterfactual explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T20:48:48Z)
• Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertainty [66.17147341354577]
  We argue for considering a complementary form of transparency by estimating and communicating the uncertainty associated with model predictions. We describe how uncertainty can be used to mitigate model unfairness, augment decision-making, and build trustworthy systems. This work constitutes an interdisciplinary review drawn from literature spanning machine learning, visualization/HCI, design, decision-making, and fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T17:26:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.