Enabling Regulatory Multi-Agent Collaboration: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09215v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 07:46:00 GMT
• Title: Enabling Regulatory Multi-Agent Collaboration: Architecture, Challenges, and Solutions
• Authors: Qinnan Hu, Yuntao Wang, Yuan Gao, Zhou Su, Linkang Du,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs)-empowered autonomous agents are transforming both digital and physical environments by enabling adaptive, multi-agent collaboration.<n>We propose a blockchain-enabled layered architecture for regulatory agent collaboration, comprising an agent layer, a blockchain data layer, and a regulatory application layer.<n>Our approach establishes a systematic foundation for trustworthy, resilient, and scalable regulatory mechanisms in large-scale agent ecosystems.
• Score: 30.046299694187855
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs)-empowered autonomous agents are transforming both digital and physical environments by enabling adaptive, multi-agent collaboration. While these agents offer significant opportunities across domains such as finance, healthcare, and smart manufacturing, their unpredictable behaviors and heterogeneous capabilities pose substantial governance and accountability challenges. In this paper, we propose a blockchain-enabled layered architecture for regulatory agent collaboration, comprising an agent layer, a blockchain data layer, and a regulatory application layer. Within this framework, we design three key modules: (i) an agent behavior tracing and arbitration module for automated accountability, (ii) a dynamic reputation evaluation module for trust assessment in collaborative scenarios, and (iii) a malicious behavior forecasting module for early detection of adversarial activities. Our approach establishes a systematic foundation for trustworthy, resilient, and scalable regulatory mechanisms in large-scale agent ecosystems. Finally, we discuss the future research directions for blockchain-enabled regulatory frameworks in multi-agent systems.

Related papers

• From Prompt-Response to Goal-Directed Systems: The Evolution of Agentic AI Software Architecture [0.0]
  Agentic AI denotes an architectural transition from stateless, prompt-driven generative models toward goal-directed systems.<n>This paper examines this transition by connecting intelligent agent theories, with contemporary LLM-centric approaches.<n>The study identifies a convergence toward standardized agent loops, registries, and auditable control mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-11T03:34:48Z)
• Autonomous Agents on Blockchains: Standards, Execution Models, and Trust Boundaries [2.28438857884398]
  Agentic AI systems and public blockchains have evolved into a programmable substrate for value transfer, access control, and verifiable state transitions.<n>Their convergence introduces a high-stakes systems challenge: designing standard, interoperable, and secure interfaces that allow agents to observe on-chain state, formulate transaction intents, and authorize execution without exposing users, protocols, or organizations to unacceptable security, governance, or economic risks.<n>This survey systematizes the emerging landscape of agent-blockchain interoperability through a systematic literature review, identifying 317 relevant works from an initial pool of over 3000 records.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T04:29:26Z)
• A Blockchain-Monitored Agentic AI Architecture for Trusted Perception-Reasoning-Action Pipelines [0.0]
  The application of agentic AI systems in autonomous decision-making is growing in the areas of healthcare, smart cities, digital forensics, and supply chain management.<n>The paper suggests a single architecture model comprising of LangChain-based multi-agent system with a permissioned blockchain to guarantee constant monitoring, policy enforcement, and immutable auditability of agentic action.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T06:20:28Z)
• The Agentic Regulator: Risks for AI in Finance and a Proposed Agent-based Framework for Governance [6.107950696680386]
  Current model-risk frameworks assume static, well-specified algorithms and one-time validations.<n>We model these technologies as decentralized ensembles whose risks propagate along multiple time-scales.<n>We propose a modular governance architecture that decomposes oversight into four layers of "regulatory blocks"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-12T05:57:32Z)
• Towards Transparent and Incentive-Compatible Collaboration in Decentralized LLM Multi-Agent Systems: A Blockchain-Driven Approach [21.498244821985562]
  We propose a blockchain-based framework that enables transparent agent registration, verifiable task allocation, and dynamic reputation tracking.<n>Our implementation integrates GPT-4 agents with Solidity contracts and demonstrates, through 50-round simulations, strong task success rates, stable utility distribution, and emergent agent specialization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-20T16:00:24Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems [53.37728204835912]
  Most existing AI systems rely on manually crafted configurations that remain static after deployment.<n>Recent research has explored agent evolution techniques that aim to automatically enhance agent systems based on interaction data and environmental feedback.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a systematic understanding of self-evolving AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T16:07:32Z)
• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• TRiSM for Agentic AI: A Review of Trust, Risk, and Security Management in LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems [2.462408812529728]
  This review presents a structured analysis of textbfTrust, Risk, and Security Management (TRiSM) in the context of LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems (AMAS)<n>We begin by examining the conceptual foundations of Agentic AI and highlight its architectural distinctions from traditional AI agents.<n>We then adapt and extend the AI TRiSM framework for Agentic AI, structured around four key pillars: Explainability, ModelOps, Security, Privacy and Governance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T16:26:11Z)
• A Novel Zero-Trust Identity Framework for Agentic AI: Decentralized Authentication and Fine-Grained Access Control [7.228060525494563]
  This paper posits the imperative for a novel Agentic AI IAM framework.<n>We propose a comprehensive framework built upon rich, verifiable Agent Identities (IDs)<n>We also explore how Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) enable privacy-preserving attribute disclosure and verifiable policy compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T20:21:55Z)
• AgentNet: Decentralized Evolutionary Coordination for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems [22.291969093748005]
  AgentNet is a decentralized, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based framework for multi-agent systems.<n>Unlike prior approaches with static roles or centralized control, AgentNet allows agents to adjust connectivity and route tasks based on local expertise and context.<n>Experiments show that AgentNet achieves higher task accuracy than both single-agent and centralized multi-agent baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T09:45:25Z)
• Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative Intelligence [79.5316642687565]
  Existing multi-agent frameworks often struggle with integrating diverse capable third-party agents. We propose the Internet of Agents (IoA), a novel framework that addresses these limitations. IoA introduces an agent integration protocol, an instant-messaging-like architecture design, and dynamic mechanisms for agent teaming and conversation flow control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T17:33:24Z)
• On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games to Partial Monitoring [105.13668993076801]
  A central problem in the theory of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is to understand what structural conditions and algorithmic principles lead to sample-efficient learning guarantees. We study this question in a general framework for interactive decision making with multiple agents. We show that characterizing the statistical complexity for multi-agent decision making is equivalent to characterizing the statistical complexity of single-agent decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T06:46:22Z)
• Multi-Agent Interactions Modeling with Correlated Policies [53.38338964628494]
  In this paper, we cast the multi-agent interactions modeling problem into a multi-agent imitation learning framework. We develop a Decentralized Adrial Imitation Learning algorithm with Correlated policies (CoDAIL) Various experiments demonstrate that CoDAIL can better regenerate complex interactions close to the demonstrators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-04T17:31:53Z)
• Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradients [47.45255170608965]
  We propose a new multi-agent actor-critic method called counterfactual multi-agent (COMA) policy gradients.<n>COMA uses a centralised critic to estimate the Q-function and decentralised actors to optimise the agents' policies.<n>We evaluate COMA in the testbed of StarCraft unit micromanagement, using a decentralised variant with significant partial observability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2017-05-24T18:52:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.