On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games to Partial Monitoring

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00684v1
• Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 06:46:22 GMT
• Title: On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games to Partial Monitoring
• Authors: Dylan J. Foster and Dean P. Foster and Noah Golowich and Alexander Rakhlin
• Abstract summary: A central problem in the theory of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is to understand what structural conditions and algorithmic principles lead to sample-efficient learning guarantees. We study this question in a general framework for interactive decision making with multiple agents. We show that characterizing the statistical complexity for multi-agent decision making is equivalent to characterizing the statistical complexity of single-agent decision making.
• Score: 105.13668993076801
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A central problem in the theory of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is to understand what structural conditions and algorithmic principles lead to sample-efficient learning guarantees, and how these considerations change as we move from few to many agents. We study this question in a general framework for interactive decision making with multiple agents, encompassing Markov games with function approximation and normal-form games with bandit feedback. We focus on equilibrium computation, in which a centralized learning algorithm aims to compute an equilibrium by controlling multiple agents that interact with an unknown environment. Our main contributions are: - We provide upper and lower bounds on the optimal sample complexity for multi-agent decision making based on a multi-agent generalization of the Decision-Estimation Coefficient, a complexity measure introduced by Foster et al. (2021) in the single-agent counterpart to our setting. Compared to the best results for the single-agent setting, our bounds have additional gaps. We show that no "reasonable" complexity measure can close these gaps, highlighting a striking separation between single and multiple agents. - We show that characterizing the statistical complexity for multi-agent decision making is equivalent to characterizing the statistical complexity of single-agent decision making, but with hidden (unobserved) rewards, a framework that subsumes variants of the partial monitoring problem. As a consequence, we characterize the statistical complexity for hidden-reward interactive decision making to the best extent possible. Building on this development, we provide several new structural results, including 1) conditions under which the statistical complexity of multi-agent decision making can be reduced to that of single-agent, and 2) conditions under which the so-called curse of multiple agents can be avoided.

Related papers

• Learning Emergence of Interaction Patterns across Independent RL Agents in Multi-Agent Environments [3.0284592792243794]
  Bottom Up Network (BUN) treats the collective of multi-agents as a unified entity. Our empirical evaluations across a variety of cooperative multi-agent scenarios, including tasks such as cooperative navigation and traffic control, consistently demonstrate BUN's superiority over baseline methods with substantially reduced computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T14:25:02Z)
• Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation [49.27250832754313]
  We present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework. At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence. We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T02:20:06Z)
• Scalable Decentralized Algorithms for Online Personalized Mean Estimation [12.002609934938224]
  This study focuses on a simplified version of the overarching problem, where each agent collects samples from a real-valued distribution over time to estimate its mean. We introduce two collaborative mean estimation algorithms: one draws inspiration from belief propagation, while the other employs a consensus-based approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T08:30:46Z)
• Pure Exploration under Mediators' Feedback [63.56002444692792]
  Multi-armed bandits are a sequential-decision-making framework, where, at each interaction step, the learner selects an arm and observes a reward. We consider the scenario in which the learner has access to a set of mediators, each of which selects the arms on the agent's behalf according to a and possibly unknown policy. We propose a sequential decision-making strategy for discovering the best arm under the assumption that the mediators' policies are known to the learner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T18:18:21Z)
• Partially Observable Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Information Sharing [33.145861021414184]
  We study provable multi-agent reinforcement learning (RL) in the general framework of partially observable games (POSGs) We advocate leveraging the potential emph information-sharing among agents, a common practice in empirical multi-agent RL, and a standard model for multi-agent control systems with communications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T23:42:03Z)
• Distributed Consensus Algorithm for Decision-Making in Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandit [7.708904950194129]
  We study a structured multi-agent multi-armed bandit (MAMAB) problem in a dynamic environment. A graph reflects the information-sharing structure among agents, and the arms' reward distributions are piecewise-stationary with several unknown change points. The goal is to develop a decision-making policy for the agents that minimizes the regret, which is the expected total loss of not playing the optimal arm at each time step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T16:10:26Z)
• Factorization of Multi-Agent Sampling-Based Motion Planning [72.42734061131569]
  Modern robotics often involves multiple embodied agents operating within a shared environment. Standard sampling-based algorithms can be used to search for solutions in the robots' joint space. We integrate the concept of factorization into sampling-based algorithms, which requires only minimal modifications to existing methods. We present a general implementation of a factorized SBA, derive an analytical gain in terms of sample complexity for PRM*, and showcase empirical results for RRG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-01T15:50:18Z)
• Randomized Entity-wise Factorization for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [59.62721526353915]
  Multi-agent settings in the real world often involve tasks with varying types and quantities of agents and non-agent entities. Our method aims to leverage these commonalities by asking the question: What is the expected utility of each agent when only considering a randomly selected sub-group of its observed entities?''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T18:28:41Z)
• F2A2: Flexible Fully-decentralized Approximate Actor-critic for Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning [110.35516334788687]
  Decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning algorithms are sometimes unpractical in complicated applications. We propose a flexible fully decentralized actor-critic MARL framework, which can handle large-scale general cooperative multi-agent setting. Our framework can achieve scalability and stability for large-scale environment and reduce information transmission.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-17T14:56:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.