Distinguishing Startle from Surprise Events Based on Physiological Signals

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09799v1
• Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 19:02:13 GMT
• Title: Distinguishing Startle from Surprise Events Based on Physiological Signals
• Authors: Mansi Sharma, Alexandre Duchevet, Florian Daiber, Jean-Paul Imbert, Maurice Rekrut,
• Abstract summary: We identify startle and surprise events based on physiological signals using machine learning and multi-modal fusion strategies.<n>Our results demonstrate that these events can be reliably predicted, achieving a highest mean accuracy of 85.7% with SVM and Late Fusion.<n>To further validate the robustness of our model, we extended the evaluation to include a baseline condition, successfully differentiating between Startle, Surprise, and Baseline states with a highest mean accuracy of 74.9% with XGBoost and Late Fusion.
• Score: 44.17042547618593
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Unexpected events can impair attention and delay decision-making, posing serious safety risks in high-risk environments such as aviation. In particular, reactions like startle and surprise can impact pilot performance in different ways, yet are often hard to distinguish in practice. Existing research has largely studied these reactions separately, with limited focus on their combined effects or how to differentiate them using physiological data. In this work, we address this gap by distinguishing between startle and surprise events based on physiological signals using machine learning and multi-modal fusion strategies. Our results demonstrate that these events can be reliably predicted, achieving a highest mean accuracy of 85.7% with SVM and Late Fusion. To further validate the robustness of our model, we extended the evaluation to include a baseline condition, successfully differentiating between Startle, Surprise, and Baseline states with a highest mean accuracy of 74.9% with XGBoost and Late Fusion.

Related papers

• Data Fusion for Partial Identification of Causal Effects [62.56890808004615]
  We propose a novel partial identification framework that enables researchers to answer key questions.<n>Is the causal effect positive or negative? and How severe must assumption violations be to overturn this conclusion?<n>We apply our framework to the Project STAR study, which investigates the effect of classroom size on students' third-grade standardized test performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T07:13:01Z)
• Statistical Learning for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: Pretraining, Prognosis, and Prediction [40.96453902709292]
  We propose pretraining strategies that leverage a phenomenon in real-world applications.<n>In medicine, components of the same biological signaling pathways frequently influence both baseline risk and treatment response.<n>We use this structure to incorporate side information and develop models that can exploit synergies between risk prediction and causal effect estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-01T05:12:14Z)
• Explainable LightGBM Approach for Predicting Myocardial Infarction Mortality [0.0]
  Myocardial Infarction is a main cause of mortality globally, and accurate risk prediction is crucial for improving patient outcomes. In this article, we investigate the impact of the data preprocessing task and compare three ensembles boosted tree methods to predict the risk of mortality. Our approach achieved a superior performance when compared to other existing machine learning approaches, with an F1-score of 91,2% and an accuracy of 91,8% for LightGBM without data preprocessing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T13:35:22Z)
• Seeing is not Believing: Robust Reinforcement Learning against Spurious Correlation [57.351098530477124]
  We consider one critical type of robustness against spurious correlation, where different portions of the state do not have correlations induced by unobserved confounders. A model that learns such useless or even harmful correlation could catastrophically fail when the confounder in the test case deviates from the training one. Existing robust algorithms that assume simple and unstructured uncertainty sets are therefore inadequate to address this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-15T23:53:37Z)
• Toward Robust Uncertainty Estimation with Random Activation Functions [3.0586855806896045]
  We propose a novel approach for uncertainty quantification via ensembles, called Random Activation Functions (RAFs) Ensemble. RAFs Ensemble outperforms state-of-the-art ensemble uncertainty quantification methods on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T13:17:56Z)
• Robustness Evaluation of Regression Tasks with Skewed Domain Preferences [3.42658286826597]
  We deal with two encapsulated problems simultaneously. First, assessing the performance of regression models when non-uniform preferences apply. Second, assessing the robustness of models when dealing with uncertainty regarding the actual underlying distribution of values relevant for such problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-15T00:37:41Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
  This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model. We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data. Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.